You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Julian Reschke (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2018/02/15 13:08:00 UTC
[jira] [Updated] (OAK-4859) Warn if lease update is invoked with
large delay
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4859?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Julian Reschke updated OAK-4859:
--------------------------------
Attachment: OAK-4859-for-1.0.diff
> Warn if lease update is invoked with large delay
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-4859
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-4859
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: documentmk
> Affects Versions: 1.5.10
> Reporter: Stefan Egli
> Assignee: Stefan Egli
> Priority: Major
> Labels: candidate_oak_1_0
> Fix For: 1.4.15, 1.5.13, 1.6.0, 1.2.26
>
> Attachments: OAK-4859-for-1.0.diff
>
>
> DocumentMk's lease mechanism is built on the assumption that the lease is periodically updated by each instance. If the update doesn't happen within a certain time - and the instance hasn't crashed - there's the risk of the own lease to fail. It is therefore important that the lease update happens without (large) delay according to the configured period.
> One pattern where this doesn't happen is when the VM is under heavy load due to JVM-Full-GC cycles. It seems likely that a memory problem doesn't normally happen instantly, but slowly builds up. Based on this assumption we could introduce a check that compares the actual time since last lease update with the desired period. If these two diverge _a lot_ then we can at least issue a log.warn. This might help to easier identify this type of lease failures and perhaps find root causes earlier/easier.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v7.6.3#76005)