You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@myfaces.apache.org by David Steinkopff <da...@googlemail.com> on 2007/05/30 09:48:55 UTC
What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
Hello,
I ´m reading interested in this mailing list and I see that JSF
1.2implementation from MyFaces is coming soon.
Now I ask me the question, what changes must I attend if I immigrate a JSF
1.1 application with own PropertyResolver and PhaseListener?
regards
David
Re: What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
Posted by David Steinkopff <da...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Alexander,
OK, and setValue, getValue and getTyp are required for run-time, sure?
If that case, I only modified my PropertyResolver in some linies and it
works.
regards
David
2007/5/31, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121) <al...@credit-suisse.com>:
>
> Hi David
>
> - list: Sure, you can add as mny as you want. The first one that can
> satisfy the request marks it and thechain ends...
> Nice, cause every Resolver does one task (separation of concerns)
> That is also why you found so many ELResolvers floating around...
>
> regards
> Alexander
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* David Steinkopff [mailto:david.steinkopff@googlemail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 31, 2007 10:19 AM
> *To:* MyFaces Discussion
> *Subject:* Re: What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
>
> Hi Alexander,
>
> I prefer more to decorat, becauce I need only some PropertyResolver
> methods. ELResolver works like PropertyResolver and VariableResolver
> together and to implement both is more as I needed in my case.
> What do you mean with list? It is possible to add more than one resolver?
>
> regards
> David
>
> 2007/5/31, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121) < alexander.jesse@credit-suisse.com
> >:
> >
> > As Adam I recommend to rewrite to the ELResolvers, if you do not
> > absolutely need the backward compatibility.
> >
> > As for writing or decorating...
> > With the ELResolver the handling is very easy when you start from
> > scratch (== not decorating). And then you just add your
> > ELResolver to the list...
> >
> > regards
> > Alexander
> >
> > ------------------------------
> > *From:* David Steinkopff [mailto:david.steinkopff@googlemail.com]
> > *Sent:* Thursday, May 31, 2007 9:00 AM
> > *To:* MyFaces Discussion
> > *Subject:* Re: What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I dont need all features of ELResolvers, for me only important is
> > setValue, getValue and maybe isReadonly to connect a custom data system. In
> > this way was PropertyResolver more than enough for me.
> > JSF 1.1 have only one implementation of PropertyResolver and JSF 1.2have with ELResolver more than one. Which implementation I can use for a
> > decorator or what implementation is common standard in JSF 1.2?
> >
> > Regards
> > David
> >
> >
> > 2007/5/30, Adam Winer < awiner@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > FYI, I strongly recommend that developers who are moving up
> > > to JSF 1.2 rewrite PropertyResolvers and VariableResolvers
> > > as ELResolvers.
> > >
> > > Backwards compatibility for registered (programatic or via
> > > faces-config.xml ) VariableResolver and PropertyResolvers has
> > > been a major nightmare for the reference implementation,
> > > and I'd be amazed if MyFaces 1.2 didn't have some bugs
> > > here. And, even if it's perfect, there's a slight performance
> > > hit associated with using legacy EL APIs.
> > >
> > > -- Adam
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On 5/30/07, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121)
> > > < alexander.jesse@credit-suisse.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > The PropertyResolver is ONLY DEPRECATED. It still can be accessed,
> > > although
> > > > a compiler might throw warnings....
> > > >
> > > > regards
> > > > Alexander
> > > >
> > > > ________________________________
> > > > From: David Steinkopff [mailto:david.steinkopff@googlemail.com]
> > > > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 11:04 AM
> > > > To: MyFaces Discussion
> > > > Subject: Re: What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Hi Martin,
> > > >
> > > > current is my PropertyResolver a decorator of the
> > > PropertyResolverImpl from
> > > > MyFaces. Would it neccessary to wright a new decorator for the
> > > ELResolver
> > > > implementation? Or I can use the PropertyResolver in JSF 1.2 in face
> > > of
> > > > deprecated?
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > > David
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > 2007/5/30, Martin Marinschek < martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > > It _should_ work out of the box - everything else would be a bug.
> > > Also
> > > > > the property-resolver should work, it would be integrated into the
> > > > > el-resolver-chain...
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 5/30/07, David Steinkopff < david.steinkopff@googlemail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > > > > > Hello,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I ´m reading interested in this mailing list and I see that JSF
> > > 1.2
> > > > > > implementation from MyFaces is coming soon.
> > > > > > Now I ask me the question, what changes must I attend if I
> > > immigrate a
> > > > JSF
> > > > > > 1.1 application with own PropertyResolver and PhaseListener?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards
> > > > > > David
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
RE: What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
Posted by "Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121)" <al...@credit-suisse.com>.
Hi David
- list: Sure, you can add as mny as you want. The first one that can satisfy the request marks it and thechain ends...
Nice, cause every Resolver does one task (separation of concerns)
That is also why you found so many ELResolvers floating around...
regards
Alexander
________________________________
From: David Steinkopff [mailto:david.steinkopff@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 10:19 AM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
Hi Alexander,
I prefer more to decorat, becauce I need only some PropertyResolver methods. ELResolver works like PropertyResolver and VariableResolver together and to implement both is more as I needed in my case.
What do you mean with list? It is possible to add more than one resolver?
regards
David
2007/5/31, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121) < alexander.jesse@credit-suisse.com <ma...@credit-suisse.com> >:
As Adam I recommend to rewrite to the ELResolvers, if you do not absolutely need the backward compatibility.
As for writing or decorating...
With the ELResolver the handling is very easy when you start from scratch (== not decorating). And then you just add your
ELResolver to the list...
regards
Alexander
________________________________
From: David Steinkopff [mailto:david.steinkopff@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 9:00 AM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
Hi,
I dont need all features of ELResolvers, for me only important is setValue, getValue and maybe isReadonly to connect a custom data system. In this way was PropertyResolver more than enough for me.
JSF 1.1 have only one implementation of PropertyResolver and JSF 1.2 have with ELResolver more than one. Which implementation I can use for a decorator or what implementation is common standard in JSF 1.2?
Regards
David
2007/5/30, Adam Winer < awiner@gmail.com>:
FYI, I strongly recommend that developers who are moving up
to JSF 1.2 rewrite PropertyResolvers and VariableResolvers
as ELResolvers.
Backwards compatibility for registered (programatic or via
faces-config.xml ) VariableResolver and PropertyResolvers has
been a major nightmare for the reference implementation,
and I'd be amazed if MyFaces 1.2 didn't have some bugs
here. And, even if it's perfect, there's a slight performance
hit associated with using legacy EL APIs.
-- Adam
On 5/30/07, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121)
< alexander.jesse@credit-suisse.com <ma...@credit-suisse.com> > wrote:
>
>
> The PropertyResolver is ONLY DEPRECATED. It still can be accessed, although
> a compiler might throw warnings....
>
> regards
> Alexander
>
> ________________________________
> From: David Steinkopff [mailto:david.steinkopff@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 11:04 AM
> To: MyFaces Discussion
> Subject: Re: What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
>
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> current is my PropertyResolver a decorator of the PropertyResolverImpl from
> MyFaces. Would it neccessary to wright a new decorator for the ELResolver
> implementation? Or I can use the PropertyResolver in JSF 1.2 in face of
> deprecated?
>
> Regards
> David
>
>
> 2007/5/30, Martin Marinschek < martin.marinschek@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> >:
> > It _should_ work out of the box - everything else would be a bug. Also
> > the property-resolver should work, it would be integrated into the
> > el-resolver-chain...
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 5/30/07, David Steinkopff < david.steinkopff@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I ´m reading interested in this mailing list and I see that JSF 1.2
> > > implementation from MyFaces is coming soon.
> > > Now I ask me the question, what changes must I attend if I immigrate a
> JSF
> > > 1.1 application with own PropertyResolver and PhaseListener?
> > >
> > > regards
> > > David
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
>
Re: What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
Posted by David Steinkopff <da...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Alexander,
I prefer more to decorat, becauce I need only some PropertyResolver methods.
ELResolver works like PropertyResolver and VariableResolver together and to
implement both is more as I needed in my case.
What do you mean with list? It is possible to add more than one resolver?
regards
David
2007/5/31, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121) <al...@credit-suisse.com>:
>
> As Adam I recommend to rewrite to the ELResolvers, if you do not
> absolutely need the backward compatibility.
>
> As for writing or decorating...
> With the ELResolver the handling is very easy when you start from scratch
> (== not decorating). And then you just add your
> ELResolver to the list...
>
> regards
> Alexander
>
> ------------------------------
> *From:* David Steinkopff [mailto:david.steinkopff@googlemail.com]
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 31, 2007 9:00 AM
> *To:* MyFaces Discussion
> *Subject:* Re: What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
>
> Hi,
>
> I dont need all features of ELResolvers, for me only important is
> setValue, getValue and maybe isReadonly to connect a custom data system. In
> this way was PropertyResolver more than enough for me.
> JSF 1.1 have only one implementation of PropertyResolver and JSF 1.2 have
> with ELResolver more than one. Which implementation I can use for a
> decorator or what implementation is common standard in JSF 1.2?
>
> Regards
> David
>
>
> 2007/5/30, Adam Winer < awiner@gmail.com>:
> >
> > FYI, I strongly recommend that developers who are moving up
> > to JSF 1.2 rewrite PropertyResolvers and VariableResolvers
> > as ELResolvers.
> >
> > Backwards compatibility for registered (programatic or via
> > faces-config.xml ) VariableResolver and PropertyResolvers has
> > been a major nightmare for the reference implementation,
> > and I'd be amazed if MyFaces 1.2 didn't have some bugs
> > here. And, even if it's perfect, there's a slight performance
> > hit associated with using legacy EL APIs.
> >
> > -- Adam
> >
> >
> >
> > On 5/30/07, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121)
> > < alexander.jesse@credit-suisse.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > The PropertyResolver is ONLY DEPRECATED. It still can be accessed,
> > although
> > > a compiler might throw warnings....
> > >
> > > regards
> > > Alexander
> > >
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: David Steinkopff [mailto:david.steinkopff@googlemail.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 11:04 AM
> > > To: MyFaces Discussion
> > > Subject: Re: What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
> > >
> > >
> > > Hi Martin,
> > >
> > > current is my PropertyResolver a decorator of the PropertyResolverImpl
> > from
> > > MyFaces. Would it neccessary to wright a new decorator for the
> > ELResolver
> > > implementation? Or I can use the PropertyResolver in JSF 1.2 in face
> > of
> > > deprecated?
> > >
> > > Regards
> > > David
> > >
> > >
> > > 2007/5/30, Martin Marinschek < martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > > It _should_ work out of the box - everything else would be a bug.
> > Also
> > > > the property-resolver should work, it would be integrated into the
> > > > el-resolver-chain...
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 5/30/07, David Steinkopff < david.steinkopff@googlemail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > Hello,
> > > > >
> > > > > I ´m reading interested in this mailing list and I see that JSF
> > 1.2
> > > > > implementation from MyFaces is coming soon.
> > > > > Now I ask me the question, what changes must I attend if I
> > immigrate a
> > > JSF
> > > > > 1.1 application with own PropertyResolver and PhaseListener?
> > > > >
> > > > > regards
> > > > > David
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
RE: What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
Posted by "Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121)" <al...@credit-suisse.com>.
As Adam I recommend to rewrite to the ELResolvers, if you do not absolutely need the backward compatibility.
As for writing or decorating...
With the ELResolver the handling is very easy when you start from scratch (== not decorating). And then you just add your
ELResolver to the list...
regards
Alexander
________________________________
From: David Steinkopff [mailto:david.steinkopff@googlemail.com]
Sent: Thursday, May 31, 2007 9:00 AM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
Hi,
I dont need all features of ELResolvers, for me only important is setValue, getValue and maybe isReadonly to connect a custom data system. In this way was PropertyResolver more than enough for me.
JSF 1.1 have only one implementation of PropertyResolver and JSF 1.2 have with ELResolver more than one. Which implementation I can use for a decorator or what implementation is common standard in JSF 1.2?
Regards
David
2007/5/30, Adam Winer < awiner@gmail.com>:
FYI, I strongly recommend that developers who are moving up
to JSF 1.2 rewrite PropertyResolvers and VariableResolvers
as ELResolvers.
Backwards compatibility for registered (programatic or via
faces-config.xml ) VariableResolver and PropertyResolvers has
been a major nightmare for the reference implementation,
and I'd be amazed if MyFaces 1.2 didn't have some bugs
here. And, even if it's perfect, there's a slight performance
hit associated with using legacy EL APIs.
-- Adam
On 5/30/07, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121)
< alexander.jesse@credit-suisse.com <ma...@credit-suisse.com> > wrote:
>
>
> The PropertyResolver is ONLY DEPRECATED. It still can be accessed, although
> a compiler might throw warnings....
>
> regards
> Alexander
>
> ________________________________
> From: David Steinkopff [mailto:david.steinkopff@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 11:04 AM
> To: MyFaces Discussion
> Subject: Re: What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
>
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> current is my PropertyResolver a decorator of the PropertyResolverImpl from
> MyFaces. Would it neccessary to wright a new decorator for the ELResolver
> implementation? Or I can use the PropertyResolver in JSF 1.2 in face of
> deprecated?
>
> Regards
> David
>
>
> 2007/5/30, Martin Marinschek < martin.marinschek@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com> >:
> > It _should_ work out of the box - everything else would be a bug. Also
> > the property-resolver should work, it would be integrated into the
> > el-resolver-chain...
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 5/30/07, David Steinkopff < david.steinkopff@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I ´m reading interested in this mailing list and I see that JSF 1.2
> > > implementation from MyFaces is coming soon.
> > > Now I ask me the question, what changes must I attend if I immigrate a
> JSF
> > > 1.1 application with own PropertyResolver and PhaseListener?
> > >
> > > regards
> > > David
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
>
Re: What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
Posted by David Steinkopff <da...@googlemail.com>.
Hi,
I dont need all features of ELResolvers, for me only important is setValue,
getValue and maybe isReadonly to connect a custom data system. In this way
was PropertyResolver more than enough for me.
JSF 1.1 have only one implementation of PropertyResolver and JSF 1.2 have
with ELResolver more than one. Which implementation I can use for a
decorator or what implementation is common standard in JSF 1.2?
Regards
David
2007/5/30, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>:
>
> FYI, I strongly recommend that developers who are moving up
> to JSF 1.2 rewrite PropertyResolvers and VariableResolvers
> as ELResolvers.
>
> Backwards compatibility for registered (programatic or via
> faces-config.xml ) VariableResolver and PropertyResolvers has
> been a major nightmare for the reference implementation,
> and I'd be amazed if MyFaces 1.2 didn't have some bugs
> here. And, even if it's perfect, there's a slight performance
> hit associated with using legacy EL APIs.
>
> -- Adam
>
>
>
> On 5/30/07, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121)
> <al...@credit-suisse.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > The PropertyResolver is ONLY DEPRECATED. It still can be accessed,
> although
> > a compiler might throw warnings....
> >
> > regards
> > Alexander
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: David Steinkopff [mailto:david.steinkopff@googlemail.com]
> > Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 11:04 AM
> > To: MyFaces Discussion
> > Subject: Re: What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
> >
> >
> > Hi Martin,
> >
> > current is my PropertyResolver a decorator of the PropertyResolverImpl
> from
> > MyFaces. Would it neccessary to wright a new decorator for the
> ELResolver
> > implementation? Or I can use the PropertyResolver in JSF 1.2 in face of
> > deprecated?
> >
> > Regards
> > David
> >
> >
> > 2007/5/30, Martin Marinschek < martin.marinschek@gmail.com>:
> > > It _should_ work out of the box - everything else would be a bug. Also
> > > the property-resolver should work, it would be integrated into the
> > > el-resolver-chain...
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 5/30/07, David Steinkopff < david.steinkopff@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I ´m reading interested in this mailing list and I see that JSF 1.2
> > > > implementation from MyFaces is coming soon.
> > > > Now I ask me the question, what changes must I attend if I immigrate
> a
> > JSF
> > > > 1.1 application with own PropertyResolver and PhaseListener?
> > > >
> > > > regards
> > > > David
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
Posted by Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>.
FYI, I strongly recommend that developers who are moving up
to JSF 1.2 rewrite PropertyResolvers and VariableResolvers
as ELResolvers.
Backwards compatibility for registered (programatic or via
faces-config.xml) VariableResolver and PropertyResolvers has
been a major nightmare for the reference implementation,
and I'd be amazed if MyFaces 1.2 didn't have some bugs
here. And, even if it's perfect, there's a slight performance
hit associated with using legacy EL APIs.
-- Adam
On 5/30/07, Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121)
<al...@credit-suisse.com> wrote:
>
>
> The PropertyResolver is ONLY DEPRECATED. It still can be accessed, although
> a compiler might throw warnings....
>
> regards
> Alexander
>
> ________________________________
> From: David Steinkopff [mailto:david.steinkopff@googlemail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 11:04 AM
> To: MyFaces Discussion
> Subject: Re: What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
>
>
> Hi Martin,
>
> current is my PropertyResolver a decorator of the PropertyResolverImpl from
> MyFaces. Would it neccessary to wright a new decorator for the ELResolver
> implementation? Or I can use the PropertyResolver in JSF 1.2 in face of
> deprecated?
>
> Regards
> David
>
>
> 2007/5/30, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
> > It _should_ work out of the box - everything else would be a bug. Also
> > the property-resolver should work, it would be integrated into the
> > el-resolver-chain...
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 5/30/07, David Steinkopff < david.steinkopff@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > > Hello,
> > >
> > > I ´m reading interested in this mailing list and I see that JSF 1.2
> > > implementation from MyFaces is coming soon.
> > > Now I ask me the question, what changes must I attend if I immigrate a
> JSF
> > > 1.1 application with own PropertyResolver and PhaseListener?
> > >
> > > regards
> > > David
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
>
>
RE: What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
Posted by "Jesse Alexander (KSFD 121)" <al...@credit-suisse.com>.
The PropertyResolver is ONLY DEPRECATED. It still can be accessed, although a compiler might throw warnings....
regards
Alexander
________________________________
From: David Steinkopff [mailto:david.steinkopff@googlemail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2007 11:04 AM
To: MyFaces Discussion
Subject: Re: What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
Hi Martin,
current is my PropertyResolver a decorator of the PropertyResolverImpl from MyFaces. Would it neccessary to wright a new decorator for the ELResolver implementation? Or I can use the PropertyResolver in JSF 1.2 in face of deprecated?
Regards
David
2007/5/30, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
It _should_ work out of the box - everything else would be a bug. Also
the property-resolver should work, it would be integrated into the
el-resolver-chain...
regards,
Martin
On 5/30/07, David Steinkopff < david.steinkopff@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I ´m reading interested in this mailing list and I see that JSF 1.2
> implementation from MyFaces is coming soon.
> Now I ask me the question, what changes must I attend if I immigrate a JSF
> 1.1 application with own PropertyResolver and PhaseListener?
>
> regards
> David
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
Re: What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
Posted by David Steinkopff <da...@googlemail.com>.
Hi Martin,
current is my PropertyResolver a decorator of the PropertyResolverImpl from
MyFaces. Would it neccessary to wright a new decorator for the ELResolver
implementation? Or I can use the PropertyResolver in JSF 1.2 in face of
deprecated?
Regards
David
2007/5/30, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>:
>
> It _should_ work out of the box - everything else would be a bug. Also
> the property-resolver should work, it would be integrated into the
> el-resolver-chain...
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 5/30/07, David Steinkopff <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I ´m reading interested in this mailing list and I see that JSF 1.2
> > implementation from MyFaces is coming soon.
> > Now I ask me the question, what changes must I attend if I immigrate a
> JSF
> > 1.1 application with own PropertyResolver and PhaseListener?
> >
> > regards
> > David
> >
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
Re: What change with JSF 1.1 to JSF 1.2?
Posted by Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com>.
It _should_ work out of the box - everything else would be a bug. Also
the property-resolver should work, it would be integrated into the
el-resolver-chain...
regards,
Martin
On 5/30/07, David Steinkopff <da...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I ´m reading interested in this mailing list and I see that JSF 1.2
> implementation from MyFaces is coming soon.
> Now I ask me the question, what changes must I attend if I immigrate a JSF
> 1.1 application with own PropertyResolver and PhaseListener?
>
> regards
> David
>
--
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces