You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@xerces.apache.org by "Cruceta, Sergio (Sergio)" <sc...@lucent.com> on 2000/02/28 17:36:30 UTC
Getting binaries for Solaris 2.6 and CC 5.0
Hi everybody,
I would like to know if someone can send me the binaries of Xerces for
Solaris 2.6 and CC 5.0. (version 1.0.1 it's right and 1.1.0 perfect)
I followed the script published by Eric Yankowitz in the mailing-list, and
finallly I got my binaries (It sounds great, isn't it?),
but when I tried to compile the samples, the compiler didn't find some
instantiated templates (if you really need more details I can send you
them).
I suppose It's a problem of my binaries and, of course, it's easier to get
other properly generated.
Could someone help me?
Thanks in advance.
> Best regards,
>
> Sergio Cruceta Gómez
> Lucent Technologies O
> m I c r o e l e c t r o n I c s g r o u p
>
Pol. Ind. Tres Cantos Zona Oeste, s/n
28760 Tres Cantos (Madrid)
* +34 91 807 1272
* +34 91 807 1126
* mailto:scg@lucent.com
RE: Sun CC 5.0 support in xerces C
Posted by Linda Derezinski <li...@interfacecontrol.com>.
The complete instructions are at: http://xml.apache.org/cvs.html
Put yourself in the directory you want the xml-xerces directory created
then:
cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@xml.apache.org:/home/cvspublic login
password: anoncvs
cvs -d :pserver:anoncvs@xml.apache.org:/home/cvspublic
checkout xml-xerces
_______________________________________________________________
Linda Derezinski
Interface & Control Systems
-----Original Message-----
From: David A. Lee [mailto:dave@calldei.com]
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2000 2:34 PM
To: xerces-dev@xml.apache.org
Subject: Re: Sun CC 5.0 support in xerces C
Could you give me a pointer on finding how I can use cvs remotely to get
this tree.
I can get cvs but have no idea how to use it remotely to extract source
from the main repository.
Any idea when this might make it into a release gzip on the FTP server?
Thanks
--------------------------------------------------
David A. Lee
Dal Enterprises Inc.
http://www.calldei.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Arundhati Bhowmick <ar...@hyperreal.org>
To: <xe...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 5:51 PM
Subject: Sun CC 5.0 support in xerces C
> I've now incorporated changes necessary for Sun CC5.0 in xerces C code
base.
> Users compiling the source code may ignore the linker warning. I've tried
it on
> Solaris 2.7 Sun CC 5.0 and Solaris 2.6 CC4.2. The same code base now works
> perfectly on both OS and can be extracted from cvs.
>
> Arundhati
>
>
>
Re: Sun CC 5.0 support in xerces C
Posted by "David A. Lee" <da...@calldei.com>.
Could you give me a pointer on finding how I can use cvs remotely to get
this tree.
I can get cvs but have no idea how to use it remotely to extract source
from the main repository.
Any idea when this might make it into a release gzip on the FTP server?
Thanks
--------------------------------------------------
David A. Lee
Dal Enterprises Inc.
http://www.calldei.com
----- Original Message -----
From: Arundhati Bhowmick <ar...@hyperreal.org>
To: <xe...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Wednesday, March 01, 2000 5:51 PM
Subject: Sun CC 5.0 support in xerces C
> I've now incorporated changes necessary for Sun CC5.0 in xerces C code
base.
> Users compiling the source code may ignore the linker warning. I've tried
it on
> Solaris 2.7 Sun CC 5.0 and Solaris 2.6 CC4.2. The same code base now works
> perfectly on both OS and can be extracted from cvs.
>
> Arundhati
>
>
>
Sun CC 5.0 support in xerces C
Posted by Arundhati Bhowmick <ar...@hyperreal.org>.
I've now incorporated changes necessary for Sun CC5.0 in xerces C code base.
Users compiling the source code may ignore the linker warning. I've tried it on
Solaris 2.7 Sun CC 5.0 and Solaris 2.6 CC4.2. The same code base now works
perfectly on both OS and can be extracted from cvs.
Arundhati
Re: Getting binaries for Solaris 2.6 and CC 5.0
Posted by "David A. Lee" <da...@calldei.com>.
Thanks !!!
I'd be willing to help on this also. I cannot really endorse XERCES
in our product (as I really want to do)
unless we can have a clean build with each new release without
resorting to unsupported patches of the sort below ....
Anything I can do to help get this in 'officially' ?
I have a Solaris 7 (2.7) with CC5.0 (SunWorkshop)
and can provide an rlogin if necessary, and/or run builds and email results.
> A while ago Eric did successfully compile this on solaris 5.0 and gave his
> patch. Unfortunately its still not tested /integrated at our end due to
some
> political reasons here for the new release.
> I'm pasting the Eric's mail here regarding the changes he introduced to
get it
> compiled. Hope this information helps you too. Thanks Eric for your
effort.
>
> Arundhati
> --------------------------
> Below is a script I wrote that patches in support for the Sun WorkShop
> 5.0 compiler
> on the Xerces-C 1.1.0 source tree.
>
> This script does the following:
> Removes NO_NATIVE_BOOL. (Sun WorkShop 5.0 now has native bool
> support.)
> Makes various changes to support the external template instance
> placement and linkage method.
> Removes -lC parameter to the linker. Explicitly specifying it
> confuses WorkShop.
> Adds -mt as a parameter to the compiler and linker when
> compiling the samples. This is already set up correctly
> in the src directory.
>
> In order to support the external template instance method, Makefile.incl
> had to be changed.
> Make now directs the compiler to output its object files to
> $XERCESCROOT/obj
> rather than creating them in the current directory followed by a copy to
> $XERCESCROOT/obj.
> This is needed to ensure that the template repository is created
> properly.
>
> Note: Because object files are directly compiled into $XERCESCROOT you
> will see
> the following sorts of error messages during the make:
> cp: cannot access BinFileInputStream.o
> cp: cannot access BinInputStream.o
> cp: cannot access BinMemInputStream.o
> .
> .
> .
> They can be safely ignored.
>
> I would be willing to be spend some more time to get Xerces-C compiling
> out of the box
> under the Sun WorkShop 5.0 compiler.
>
>
> Any questions,
> -Eric Yankowitz
> eric@swiftdesign.com
>
> To run the script modify the "export SRCROOT=....." and "export
> PACKAGE=......"
> lines WITHIN the script and ensure that your path points to gnu make,
> gnu autoconf,
> and gnu m4 ahead of any other versions.
>
>
> #! /bin/ksh
>
> export SRCROOT=/home/statemnt/libs/xerces
> export PACKAGE=/home/statemnt/pack/cpp/xml/xerces-csrc_1_1_0_d05.tar.gz
>
> export XERCESCROOT=$SRCROOT/xerces-csrc_1_1_0_d05
> cd $SRCROOT
>
> echo "Attempting to remove any previous installations @ $XERCESCROOT"
> echo
>
> rm -rf $XERCESCROOT
>
> echo "Unpacking $PACKAGE"
> echo
> gzip -dc $PACKAGE | tar xvf -
>
> cd $XERCESCROOT/src
> echo "Running: autoconf"
> echo
> autoconf
>
> echo "Configuring the source tree"
> echo
> ./runConfigure -psolaris -ccc -xCC -d -nfileonly -rpthread
>
> echo "Patching up files for WorkShop Compilers 5.0 98/12/15 C++ 5.0"
> echo
>
> echo "Sun WorkShop 5.0 Compiler supports native bools."
> echo "Removing NO_NATIVE_BOOL define."
> echo
> mv util/Compilers/SunCCDefs.hpp util/Compilers/SunCCDefs.hpp.orig
> sed -e "s/^#define NO_NATIVE_BOOL$//" util/Compilers/SunCCDefs.hpp.orig
> >
> util/Compilers/SunCCDefs.hpp
>
> echo "External template instance placement and linkage is prefered, so I
> am"
> echo "defining XML4C_TMPLSINC."
> echo
> echo "#define XML4C_TMPLSINC" >> util/Compilers/SunCCDefs.hpp
>
>
> echo "Patching Makefile.incl for external template instance support."
> echo "To ensure creating a correct template repository, Object files"
> echo "will now be directly outputed to $XERCESCROOT/obj."
> echo "Also, The -lC option is redundant and causes problems, so I am
> removing it."
> echo
> mv Makefile.incl Makefile.incl.orig
> sed -e "186s/-lC -lc//" -e "189s/-lC -lc//" \
> -e "180s/-instances=static//" \
> -e "424s/\\$.@./$\(ALL_OBJECTS_DIR\)\/$\(@F\)/" \
> -e "430s/\\$.@./$\(ALL_OBJECTS_DIR\)\/$\(@F\)/" \
> -e "432s/\\$.@./$\(ALL_OBJECTS_DIR\)\/$\(@F\)/" \
> Makefile.incl.orig > Makefile.incl
>
> make
>
> cd ../samples
> echo "Removing -lC from the samples/runConfigure"
> echo
> mv ./runConfigure ./runConfigure.orig
> sed -e"247d" ./runConfigure.orig > ./runConfigure
> chmod +x ./runConfigure
>
> echo "Setting/Removing the following in samples/Makefile.incl:"
> echo " Removing -lC"
> echo " Setting external template instances"
> echo " Setting multi-threading"
> echo
> mv Makefile.incl Makefile.incl.orig
> sed -e "129s/-lC -lc//" \
> -e "126s/-instances=static//" \
> -e "126,127s/$/ -mt/" \
> Makefile.incl.orig > Makefile.incl
>
> ./runConfigure -psolaris -ccc -xCC -d
>
> make
>
>
>
> -----------------------------
> "David A. Lee" wrote:
>
> > Unfortunately, SUN documents the -ptr flag as pretty much obsolete ....
> > ('may not always work') and discourages it.
> > Also interesting is I found from experiment that -instances=static
> > produces *massively smaller* code then using the default
template-database
> > options.
> > (this is entirely counter-intuitive as -instances=static replicates all
> > template bodies in each .o file,
> > while the tempate database shares code ).
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Michael Krivoruchko <mi...@sun.com>
> > To: <xe...@xml.apache.org>
> > Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 11:43 AM
> > Subject: Re: Getting binaries for Solaris 2.6 and CC 5.0
> >
> > > Hi All,
> > >
> > > I am not 100% sure, but it sounds to me that you should try
> > > "-ptr" option while you compile the examples.
> > >
> > > -------------------- AB2 SunWS C++ 5.0 User's Guide -----------------
> > > -ptrdatabase-path
> > >
> > > Specifies the directory of the template repository.
> > >
> > > The template repository is contained within the SunWS_config or
> > > SunWS_cache subdirectory of the given directory. The template
> > > repository cache files are stored in directory/SunWS_cache. The
> > > template repository configuration files are stored in
> > > directory/SunWS_config.
> > >
> > > You cannot use multiple -ptr options.
> > > -------------------- AB2 SunWS C++ 5.0 User's Guide -----------------
> > >
> > > Misha
> > >
> > > "David A. Lee" wrote:
> > > >
> > > > I get this same problem with Solaris 2.7 - have yet to get a CC5.0
> > > > based XERCES to compile, link, and run the basic tests.
> > > >
> > > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > > From: Cruceta, Sergio (Sergio) <sc...@lucent.com>
> > > > To: <xe...@xml.apache.org>
> > > > Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 8:36 AM
> > > > Subject: Getting binaries for Solaris 2.6 and CC 5.0
> > > >
> > > > > Hi everybody,
> > > > >
> > > > > I would like to know if someone can send me the binaries of Xerces
for
> > > > > Solaris 2.6 and CC 5.0. (version 1.0.1 it's right and 1.1.0
perfect)
> > > > > I followed the script published by Eric Yankowitz in the
mailing-list,
> > and
> > > > > finallly I got my binaries (It sounds great, isn't it?),
> > > > > but when I tried to compile the samples, the compiler didn't find
some
> > > > > instantiated templates (if you really need more details I can send
you
> > > > > them).
> > >
> > > --
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > > Michael Krivoruchko CDE Group, Sun Microsystems
> > > Bool House, East Point Business Park, Dublin 3, Ireland
> > > Ph: +353 1 819 9272 E-mail: misha@sun.com
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
>
>
Re: Getting binaries for Solaris 2.6 and CC 5.0
Posted by Arundhati Bhowmick <ar...@hyperreal.org>.
A while ago Eric did successfully compile this on solaris 5.0 and gave his
patch. Unfortunately its still not tested /integrated at our end due to some
political reasons here for the new release.
I'm pasting the Eric's mail here regarding the changes he introduced to get it
compiled. Hope this information helps you too. Thanks Eric for your effort.
Arundhati
--------------------------
Below is a script I wrote that patches in support for the Sun WorkShop
5.0 compiler
on the Xerces-C 1.1.0 source tree.
This script does the following:
Removes NO_NATIVE_BOOL. (Sun WorkShop 5.0 now has native bool
support.)
Makes various changes to support the external template instance
placement and linkage method.
Removes -lC parameter to the linker. Explicitly specifying it
confuses WorkShop.
Adds -mt as a parameter to the compiler and linker when
compiling the samples. This is already set up correctly
in the src directory.
In order to support the external template instance method, Makefile.incl
had to be changed.
Make now directs the compiler to output its object files to
$XERCESCROOT/obj
rather than creating them in the current directory followed by a copy to
$XERCESCROOT/obj.
This is needed to ensure that the template repository is created
properly.
Note: Because object files are directly compiled into $XERCESCROOT you
will see
the following sorts of error messages during the make:
cp: cannot access BinFileInputStream.o
cp: cannot access BinInputStream.o
cp: cannot access BinMemInputStream.o
.
.
.
They can be safely ignored.
I would be willing to be spend some more time to get Xerces-C compiling
out of the box
under the Sun WorkShop 5.0 compiler.
Any questions,
-Eric Yankowitz
eric@swiftdesign.com
To run the script modify the "export SRCROOT=....." and "export
PACKAGE=......"
lines WITHIN the script and ensure that your path points to gnu make,
gnu autoconf,
and gnu m4 ahead of any other versions.
#! /bin/ksh
export SRCROOT=/home/statemnt/libs/xerces
export PACKAGE=/home/statemnt/pack/cpp/xml/xerces-csrc_1_1_0_d05.tar.gz
export XERCESCROOT=$SRCROOT/xerces-csrc_1_1_0_d05
cd $SRCROOT
echo "Attempting to remove any previous installations @ $XERCESCROOT"
echo
rm -rf $XERCESCROOT
echo "Unpacking $PACKAGE"
echo
gzip -dc $PACKAGE | tar xvf -
cd $XERCESCROOT/src
echo "Running: autoconf"
echo
autoconf
echo "Configuring the source tree"
echo
./runConfigure -psolaris -ccc -xCC -d -nfileonly -rpthread
echo "Patching up files for WorkShop Compilers 5.0 98/12/15 C++ 5.0"
echo
echo "Sun WorkShop 5.0 Compiler supports native bools."
echo "Removing NO_NATIVE_BOOL define."
echo
mv util/Compilers/SunCCDefs.hpp util/Compilers/SunCCDefs.hpp.orig
sed -e "s/^#define NO_NATIVE_BOOL$//" util/Compilers/SunCCDefs.hpp.orig
>
util/Compilers/SunCCDefs.hpp
echo "External template instance placement and linkage is prefered, so I
am"
echo "defining XML4C_TMPLSINC."
echo
echo "#define XML4C_TMPLSINC" >> util/Compilers/SunCCDefs.hpp
echo "Patching Makefile.incl for external template instance support."
echo "To ensure creating a correct template repository, Object files"
echo "will now be directly outputed to $XERCESCROOT/obj."
echo "Also, The -lC option is redundant and causes problems, so I am
removing it."
echo
mv Makefile.incl Makefile.incl.orig
sed -e "186s/-lC -lc//" -e "189s/-lC -lc//" \
-e "180s/-instances=static//" \
-e "424s/\\$.@./$\(ALL_OBJECTS_DIR\)\/$\(@F\)/" \
-e "430s/\\$.@./$\(ALL_OBJECTS_DIR\)\/$\(@F\)/" \
-e "432s/\\$.@./$\(ALL_OBJECTS_DIR\)\/$\(@F\)/" \
Makefile.incl.orig > Makefile.incl
make
cd ../samples
echo "Removing -lC from the samples/runConfigure"
echo
mv ./runConfigure ./runConfigure.orig
sed -e"247d" ./runConfigure.orig > ./runConfigure
chmod +x ./runConfigure
echo "Setting/Removing the following in samples/Makefile.incl:"
echo " Removing -lC"
echo " Setting external template instances"
echo " Setting multi-threading"
echo
mv Makefile.incl Makefile.incl.orig
sed -e "129s/-lC -lc//" \
-e "126s/-instances=static//" \
-e "126,127s/$/ -mt/" \
Makefile.incl.orig > Makefile.incl
./runConfigure -psolaris -ccc -xCC -d
make
-----------------------------
"David A. Lee" wrote:
> Unfortunately, SUN documents the -ptr flag as pretty much obsolete ....
> ('may not always work') and discourages it.
> Also interesting is I found from experiment that -instances=static
> produces *massively smaller* code then using the default template-database
> options.
> (this is entirely counter-intuitive as -instances=static replicates all
> template bodies in each .o file,
> while the tempate database shares code ).
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Michael Krivoruchko <mi...@sun.com>
> To: <xe...@xml.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 11:43 AM
> Subject: Re: Getting binaries for Solaris 2.6 and CC 5.0
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > I am not 100% sure, but it sounds to me that you should try
> > "-ptr" option while you compile the examples.
> >
> > -------------------- AB2 SunWS C++ 5.0 User's Guide -----------------
> > -ptrdatabase-path
> >
> > Specifies the directory of the template repository.
> >
> > The template repository is contained within the SunWS_config or
> > SunWS_cache subdirectory of the given directory. The template
> > repository cache files are stored in directory/SunWS_cache. The
> > template repository configuration files are stored in
> > directory/SunWS_config.
> >
> > You cannot use multiple -ptr options.
> > -------------------- AB2 SunWS C++ 5.0 User's Guide -----------------
> >
> > Misha
> >
> > "David A. Lee" wrote:
> > >
> > > I get this same problem with Solaris 2.7 - have yet to get a CC5.0
> > > based XERCES to compile, link, and run the basic tests.
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: Cruceta, Sergio (Sergio) <sc...@lucent.com>
> > > To: <xe...@xml.apache.org>
> > > Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 8:36 AM
> > > Subject: Getting binaries for Solaris 2.6 and CC 5.0
> > >
> > > > Hi everybody,
> > > >
> > > > I would like to know if someone can send me the binaries of Xerces for
> > > > Solaris 2.6 and CC 5.0. (version 1.0.1 it's right and 1.1.0 perfect)
> > > > I followed the script published by Eric Yankowitz in the mailing-list,
> and
> > > > finallly I got my binaries (It sounds great, isn't it?),
> > > > but when I tried to compile the samples, the compiler didn't find some
> > > > instantiated templates (if you really need more details I can send you
> > > > them).
> >
> > --
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> > Michael Krivoruchko CDE Group, Sun Microsystems
> > Bool House, East Point Business Park, Dublin 3, Ireland
> > Ph: +353 1 819 9272 E-mail: misha@sun.com
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
Re: Getting binaries for Solaris 2.6 and CC 5.0
Posted by Michael Krivoruchko <mi...@sun.com>.
"David A. Lee" wrote:
>
> Unfortunately, SUN documents the -ptr flag as pretty much obsolete ....
> ('may not always work') and discourages it.
Just one more thought... If the problem reported by the linker...
Do you have patch 107311-09 installed? If not - better you install it
and recompile the library.
Misha
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Krivoruchko CDE Group, Sun Microsystems
Bool House, East Point Business Park, Dublin 3, Ireland
Ph: +353 1 819 9272 E-mail: misha@sun.com
---------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Getting binaries for Solaris 2.6 and CC 5.0
Posted by "David A. Lee" <da...@calldei.com>.
Unfortunately, SUN documents the -ptr flag as pretty much obsolete ....
('may not always work') and discourages it.
Also interesting is I found from experiment that -instances=static
produces *massively smaller* code then using the default template-database
options.
(this is entirely counter-intuitive as -instances=static replicates all
template bodies in each .o file,
while the tempate database shares code ).
----- Original Message -----
From: Michael Krivoruchko <mi...@sun.com>
To: <xe...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 11:43 AM
Subject: Re: Getting binaries for Solaris 2.6 and CC 5.0
> Hi All,
>
> I am not 100% sure, but it sounds to me that you should try
> "-ptr" option while you compile the examples.
>
> -------------------- AB2 SunWS C++ 5.0 User's Guide -----------------
> -ptrdatabase-path
>
> Specifies the directory of the template repository.
>
> The template repository is contained within the SunWS_config or
> SunWS_cache subdirectory of the given directory. The template
> repository cache files are stored in directory/SunWS_cache. The
> template repository configuration files are stored in
> directory/SunWS_config.
>
> You cannot use multiple -ptr options.
> -------------------- AB2 SunWS C++ 5.0 User's Guide -----------------
>
> Misha
>
> "David A. Lee" wrote:
> >
> > I get this same problem with Solaris 2.7 - have yet to get a CC5.0
> > based XERCES to compile, link, and run the basic tests.
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Cruceta, Sergio (Sergio) <sc...@lucent.com>
> > To: <xe...@xml.apache.org>
> > Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 8:36 AM
> > Subject: Getting binaries for Solaris 2.6 and CC 5.0
> >
> > > Hi everybody,
> > >
> > > I would like to know if someone can send me the binaries of Xerces for
> > > Solaris 2.6 and CC 5.0. (version 1.0.1 it's right and 1.1.0 perfect)
> > > I followed the script published by Eric Yankowitz in the mailing-list,
and
> > > finallly I got my binaries (It sounds great, isn't it?),
> > > but when I tried to compile the samples, the compiler didn't find some
> > > instantiated templates (if you really need more details I can send you
> > > them).
>
> --
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
> Michael Krivoruchko CDE Group, Sun Microsystems
> Bool House, East Point Business Park, Dublin 3, Ireland
> Ph: +353 1 819 9272 E-mail: misha@sun.com
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
Re: Getting binaries for Solaris 2.6 and CC 5.0
Posted by Michael Krivoruchko <mi...@sun.com>.
Hi All,
I am not 100% sure, but it sounds to me that you should try
"-ptr" option while you compile the examples.
-------------------- AB2 SunWS C++ 5.0 User's Guide -----------------
-ptrdatabase-path
Specifies the directory of the template repository.
The template repository is contained within the SunWS_config or
SunWS_cache subdirectory of the given directory. The template
repository cache files are stored in directory/SunWS_cache. The
template repository configuration files are stored in
directory/SunWS_config.
You cannot use multiple -ptr options.
-------------------- AB2 SunWS C++ 5.0 User's Guide -----------------
Misha
"David A. Lee" wrote:
>
> I get this same problem with Solaris 2.7 - have yet to get a CC5.0
> based XERCES to compile, link, and run the basic tests.
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Cruceta, Sergio (Sergio) <sc...@lucent.com>
> To: <xe...@xml.apache.org>
> Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 8:36 AM
> Subject: Getting binaries for Solaris 2.6 and CC 5.0
>
> > Hi everybody,
> >
> > I would like to know if someone can send me the binaries of Xerces for
> > Solaris 2.6 and CC 5.0. (version 1.0.1 it's right and 1.1.0 perfect)
> > I followed the script published by Eric Yankowitz in the mailing-list, and
> > finallly I got my binaries (It sounds great, isn't it?),
> > but when I tried to compile the samples, the compiler didn't find some
> > instantiated templates (if you really need more details I can send you
> > them).
--
---------------------------------------------------------------
Michael Krivoruchko CDE Group, Sun Microsystems
Bool House, East Point Business Park, Dublin 3, Ireland
Ph: +353 1 819 9272 E-mail: misha@sun.com
---------------------------------------------------------------
Re: Getting binaries for Solaris 2.6 and CC 5.0
Posted by "David A. Lee" <da...@calldei.com>.
I get this same problem with Solaris 2.7 - have yet to get a CC5.0
based XERCES to compile, link, and run the basic tests.
----- Original Message -----
From: Cruceta, Sergio (Sergio) <sc...@lucent.com>
To: <xe...@xml.apache.org>
Sent: Monday, February 28, 2000 8:36 AM
Subject: Getting binaries for Solaris 2.6 and CC 5.0
> Hi everybody,
>
> I would like to know if someone can send me the binaries of Xerces for
> Solaris 2.6 and CC 5.0. (version 1.0.1 it's right and 1.1.0 perfect)
> I followed the script published by Eric Yankowitz in the mailing-list, and
> finallly I got my binaries (It sounds great, isn't it?),
> but when I tried to compile the samples, the compiler didn't find some
> instantiated templates (if you really need more details I can send you
> them).
> I suppose It's a problem of my binaries and, of course, it's easier to get
> other properly generated.
>
> Could someone help me?
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> > Best regards,
> >
> > Sergio Cruceta Gómez
> > Lucent Technologies O
> > m I c r o e l e c t r o n I c s g r o u p
> >
> Pol. Ind. Tres Cantos Zona Oeste, s/n
> 28760 Tres Cantos (Madrid)
> * +34 91 807 1272
> * +34 91 807 1126
> * mailto:scg@lucent.com
>
>
>
>