You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hive.apache.org by "Sergey Shelukhin (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/02/14 05:35:19 UTC
[jira] [Created] (HIVE-6430) HIVE-6429 - MapJoin hash table has
large memory overhead
Sergey Shelukhin created HIVE-6430:
--------------------------------------
Summary: HIVE-6429 - MapJoin hash table has large memory overhead
Key: HIVE-6430
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HIVE-6430
Project: Hive
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Sergey Shelukhin
Right now, in some queries, I see that storing e.g. 4 ints (2 for key and 2 for row) can take several hundred bytes, which is ridiculous. I am reducing the size of MJKey and MJRowContainer in other jiras, but in general we don't need to have java hash table there. We can either use primitive-friendly hashtable like the one from HPPC (Apache-licenced), or some variation, to map primitive keys to single row storage structure without an object per row (similar to vectorization).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.1.5#6160)