Empty pages/portlets in the console

[Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>]

Is now the time to remove the empty pages/portlets in the console? 
There are 4 pages that I'm aware of that are not yet implemented:
- EJB Server
- J2EE Connections
- CORBA/IIOP
- UDDI Server

Are there some of these that we really need to get implemented before we 
deliver v1?

While it's good to show the user what we have planned, it also looks a 
bit unprofessional to have these dead links consuming space in the task 
list.  If we still want to communicate what we plan to deliver can we do 
it somewhere else, like in the documentation?

I'd like to submit a patch to remove these before we deliver v1 if there 
are no strong objections.

Joe


-- 
Joe Bohn
joe.bohn@earthlink.net

"He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot 
lose."   -- Jim Elliot

Re: Empty pages/portlets in the console

[Aaron Mulder <am...@alumni.princeton.edu>]

I'd rather do this once we cut the 1.0 branch so the stuff doesn't
disappear in HEAD.  Not that I really have any plans for what to do
with the JUDDI portlet, but hey.

Thanks,
    Aaron

On 11/30/05, Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Is now the time to remove the empty pages/portlets in the console?
> There are 4 pages that I'm aware of that are not yet implemented:
> - EJB Server
> - J2EE Connections
> - CORBA/IIOP
> - UDDI Server
>
> Are there some of these that we really need to get implemented before we
> deliver v1?
>
> While it's good to show the user what we have planned, it also looks a
> bit unprofessional to have these dead links consuming space in the task
> list.  If we still want to communicate what we plan to deliver can we do
> it somewhere else, like in the documentation?
>
> I'd like to submit a patch to remove these before we deliver v1 if there
> are no strong objections.
>
> Joe
>
>
> --
> Joe Bohn
> joe.bohn@earthlink.net
>
> "He is no fool who gives what he cannot keep, to gain what he cannot
> lose."   -- Jim Elliot
>