You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@flink.apache.org by "Gyula Fora (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/05/09 12:22:00 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (FLINK-27551) Consider implementing our own status update logic

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-27551?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Gyula Fora reassigned FLINK-27551:
----------------------------------

    Assignee: Gyula Fora

> Consider implementing our own status update logic
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FLINK-27551
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FLINK-27551
>             Project: Flink
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Kubernetes Operator
>            Reporter: Gyula Fora
>            Assignee: Gyula Fora
>            Priority: Critical
>
> If a custom resource version is applied while in the middle of a reconcile loop (for the same resource but previous version) the status update will throw an error and re-trigger reconciliation.
> In our case this might be problematic as it would mean we would retry operations that are not necessarily retriable and might require manual user intervention.
> Please see: [https://github.com/java-operator-sdk/java-operator-sdk/issues/1198]
> I think we should consider implementing our own status update logic that is independent of the current resource version to make the flow more robust.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.7#820007)