You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@oozie.apache.org by "Harsh J (Created) (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2012/04/10 05:49:26 UTC
[jira] [Created] (OOZIE-807) Docs can be explicit about multiple
sub-worklfow definitions being possible
Docs can be explicit about multiple sub-worklfow definitions being possible
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: OOZIE-807
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-807
Project: Oozie
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: docs
Affects Versions: 3.2.0
Reporter: Harsh J
Assignee: Harsh J
Priority: Trivial
With the feature that sub-workflows offer, a FAQ may be "Does Oozie allow multiple sub-workflow definitions in the same workflow?". I think the doc page about Sub-workflows should carry a line that makes it clear this is possible just in the same way as other action types.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-807) Docs can be explicit about multiple
sub-workflow definitions being possible
Posted by "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13414171#comment-13414171 ]
Alejandro Abdelnur commented on OOZIE-807:
------------------------------------------
+1 How about rephrasing it to 'There can be several sub-workflow actions defined in a workflow'.
> Docs can be explicit about multiple sub-workflow definitions being possible
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-807
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-807
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: docs
> Affects Versions: 3.2.0
> Reporter: Harsh J
> Assignee: Harsh J
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: OOZIE-807.patch
>
>
> With the feature that sub-workflows offer, a FAQ may be "Does Oozie allow multiple sub-workflow definitions in the same workflow?". I think the doc page about Sub-workflows should carry a line that makes it clear this is possible just in the same way as other action types.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-807) Docs can be explicit about multiple
sub-workflow definitions being possible
Posted by "Hadoop QA (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13439763#comment-13439763 ]
Hadoop QA commented on OOZIE-807:
---------------------------------
Cleaning local svn workspace
Testing JIRA OOZIE-807
{code}
----------------------------
Patch failed to apply to head of branch
----------------------------
{code}
> Docs can be explicit about multiple sub-workflow definitions being possible
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-807
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-807
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: docs
> Affects Versions: 3.2.0
> Reporter: Harsh J
> Assignee: Harsh J
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: OOZIE-807.patch, OOZIE-807.patch
>
>
> With the feature that sub-workflows offer, a FAQ may be "Does Oozie allow multiple sub-workflow definitions in the same workflow?". I think the doc page about Sub-workflows should carry a line that makes it clear this is possible just in the same way as other action types.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (OOZIE-807) Docs can be explicit about multiple
sub-workflow definitions being possible
Posted by "Harsh J (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Harsh J updated OOZIE-807:
--------------------------
Summary: Docs can be explicit about multiple sub-workflow definitions being possible (was: Docs can be explicit about multiple sub-worklfow definitions being possible)
> Docs can be explicit about multiple sub-workflow definitions being possible
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-807
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-807
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: docs
> Affects Versions: 3.2.0
> Reporter: Harsh J
> Assignee: Harsh J
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: OOZIE-807.patch
>
>
> With the feature that sub-workflows offer, a FAQ may be "Does Oozie allow multiple sub-workflow definitions in the same workflow?". I think the doc page about Sub-workflows should carry a line that makes it clear this is possible just in the same way as other action types.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (OOZIE-807) Docs can be explicit about multiple
sub-workflow definitions being possible
Posted by "Harsh J (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Harsh J updated OOZIE-807:
--------------------------
Attachment: OOZIE-807.patch
Patch that adds the doc note to the sub-wf section of twiki docs.
> Docs can be explicit about multiple sub-workflow definitions being possible
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-807
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-807
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: docs
> Affects Versions: 3.2.0
> Reporter: Harsh J
> Assignee: Harsh J
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: OOZIE-807.patch
>
>
> With the feature that sub-workflows offer, a FAQ may be "Does Oozie allow multiple sub-workflow definitions in the same workflow?". I think the doc page about Sub-workflows should carry a line that makes it clear this is possible just in the same way as other action types.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-807) Docs can be explicit about multiple
sub-workflow definitions being possible
Posted by "Alejandro Abdelnur (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13422678#comment-13422678 ]
Alejandro Abdelnur commented on OOZIE-807:
------------------------------------------
+1
> Docs can be explicit about multiple sub-workflow definitions being possible
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-807
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-807
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: docs
> Affects Versions: 3.2.0
> Reporter: Harsh J
> Assignee: Harsh J
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: OOZIE-807.patch, OOZIE-807.patch
>
>
> With the feature that sub-workflows offer, a FAQ may be "Does Oozie allow multiple sub-workflow definitions in the same workflow?". I think the doc page about Sub-workflows should carry a line that makes it clear this is possible just in the same way as other action types.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira
[jira] [Updated] (OOZIE-807) Docs can be explicit about multiple
sub-workflow definitions being possible
Posted by "Harsh J (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-807?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Harsh J updated OOZIE-807:
--------------------------
Attachment: OOZIE-807.patch
Thanks for the review! Yes that would sound better, here's a rephrased patch.
> Docs can be explicit about multiple sub-workflow definitions being possible
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-807
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-807
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: docs
> Affects Versions: 3.2.0
> Reporter: Harsh J
> Assignee: Harsh J
> Priority: Trivial
> Attachments: OOZIE-807.patch, OOZIE-807.patch
>
>
> With the feature that sub-workflows offer, a FAQ may be "Does Oozie allow multiple sub-workflow definitions in the same workflow?". I think the doc page about Sub-workflows should carry a line that makes it clear this is possible just in the same way as other action types.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
If you think it was sent incorrectly, please contact your JIRA administrators: https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ContactAdministrators!default.jspa
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira