You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Robert Muir (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/01/04 19:24:45 UTC
[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-2836) FieldCache rewrite method for
MultiTermQueries
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2836?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-2836.
---------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
Assignee: Robert Muir
Committed revision 1055130.
> FieldCache rewrite method for MultiTermQueries
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-2836
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-2836
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: New Feature
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Assignee: Robert Muir
> Fix For: 4.0
>
> Attachments: LUCENE-2836.patch, LUCENE-2836.patch
>
>
> For some MultiTermQueries, like RangeQuery we have a FieldCacheRangeFilter etc (in this case its particularly optimized).
> But in the general case, since LUCENE-2784 we can now have a rewrite method to rewrite any MultiTermQuery
> using the FieldCache, because MultiTermQuery's getEnum no longer takes IndexReader but Terms, and all the
> FilteredTermsEnums are now just real TermsEnum decorators.
> In cases like low frequency queries this is actually slower (I think this has been shown for numeric ranges before too),
> but for the really high-frequency cases like especially ugly wildcards, regexes, fuzzies, etc, this can be several times faster
> using the FieldCache instead, since all the terms are in RAM and automaton can blast through them quicker.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org