You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to issues@spark.apache.org by "Patrick Wendell (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/09/16 01:13:49 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (SPARK-1379) Calling .cache() on a SchemaRDD should do something more efficient than caching the individual row objects.

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1379?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Patrick Wendell updated SPARK-1379:
-----------------------------------
    Fix Version/s:     (was: 1.1.0)
                   1.2.0

> Calling .cache() on a SchemaRDD should do something more efficient than caching the individual row objects.
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SPARK-1379
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-1379
>             Project: Spark
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SQL
>            Reporter: Michael Armbrust
>             Fix For: 1.2.0
>
>
> Since rows aren't black boxes we could use InMemoryColumnarTableScan.  This would significantly reduce GC pressure on the workers.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: issues-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: issues-help@spark.apache.org