You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to oak-issues@jackrabbit.apache.org by "Mohit Kataria (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2020/06/29 06:51:00 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (OAK-9122) Bring IndexDefinitionBuilder's
implementation in oak-search at par with the one in oak-lucene and remove
the oak-lucene implementation
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9122?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=17147583#comment-17147583 ]
Mohit Kataria commented on OAK-9122:
------------------------------------
Issue resolved:
[http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1879319]
> Bring IndexDefinitionBuilder's implementation in oak-search at par with the one in oak-lucene and remove the oak-lucene implementation
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OAK-9122
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OAK-9122
> Project: Jackrabbit Oak
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Reporter: Mohit Kataria
> Assignee: Mohit Kataria
> Priority: Major
>
> Currently oak have two IndexDefinitionBuilder implementation one in oak-search and other in oak-lucene.
> We want one implementation of IndexDefinitionBuilder so that it can be extended to have multiple implementations .e.g. lucene and elastic.
--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)