You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to derby-dev@db.apache.org by "Knut Anders Hatlen (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/05/11 13:28:41 UTC

[jira] Updated: (DERBY-4650) Predicates in HAVING clause should be pushed down to restricted VTIs

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4650?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Knut Anders Hatlen updated DERBY-4650:
--------------------------------------

    Attachment: test.diff

The attached patch adds a test case to RestrictedVTITest that shows that the predicate is not pushed in the following query:

    select s_r, count(*) from table(integerList()) t group by s_r having s_r > 1

Only the rows with s_r > 1 have to be returned by the table function integerList, so pushing the predicate could be useful.

Committed the new test case to trunk with revision 943088.

> Predicates in HAVING clause should be pushed down to restricted VTIs
> --------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: DERBY-4650
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DERBY-4650
>             Project: Derby
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: SQL
>    Affects Versions: 10.6.1.0
>            Reporter: Knut Anders Hatlen
>            Priority: Minor
>         Attachments: test.diff
>
>
> If you perform a query with an aggregate function against a restricted table function, the predicates in the HAVING clause are not pushed down to the table function.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.