You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@airflow.apache.org by James Timmins <ja...@astronomer.io.INVALID> on 2021/03/19 23:43:14 UTC
[VOTE] AIP-39: Richer scheduler_interval
Hey team,
This email calls a vote to accept AIP-39:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-39+Richer+scheduler_interval
Discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf8eeb06493681f48dc9e82ce605a9c3a930cfee0b4ca19462a4e55b3%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
There is some on-going discussion about the best name for the classes, but
it is agreed that this can be decided (and changed) at any point up until
when this feature is released. (As we have done previously with Functional
DAGs -> TaskFlow API).
This vote will last for 4 days until 2021-03-23 23:50 UTC, and until 3
binding votes have been cast.
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=AIP-39+Voting+Deadline&iso=20210323T1650&p1=137
Consider this my +1 (binding). Reminder: committer and PMC votes are both
binding on AIP votes. All community members are encouraged to vote.
Cheers,
James Timmins and Ash Berlin-Taylor
Re: [VOTE] AIP-39: Richer scheduler_interval
Posted by James Timmins <ja...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
Hey folks,
Voting is now closed, and AIP-39 has been accepted with unanimous support of 12 (11 binding) “+1” votes!
The next step is creating a Project board in Github, where we’ll begin creating issues to coordinate the development.
There were great discussions and questions (h/t Daniel Standish) about what makes the most sense to include in this AIP versus future PRs and issues. While this AIP is just about building the initial interface, I’m especially excited about what it will enable going forward, in terms of both simplifying scheduling and making it more powerful.
There was also good debate about the best name for this new class. We’ve chosen to stick with “Timetable" as originally included in the AIP, with the knowledge that we can change this in the future if the community determines that another name (for example, “Schedule”) is better.
It’s always encouraging to see how much everyone is willing to discuss, listen, and debate, with the shared goal of making Airflow as great as it can be.
Thanks,
James
On Mar 22, 2021, 12:04 AM -0700, Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org>, wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Looks really good!
>
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 5:13 AM Vikram Koka <vi...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> > > +1 binding
> > >
> > > Really good work on this James and Ash. Looking forward to seeing you take shape.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > Vikram
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 2:43 PM Ryan Hamilton <ry...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > +1 binding
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 8:41 AM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > +1 (binding).
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > This looks awesome, good work James & Ash.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Kaxil
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 20, 2021, 11:47 Ephraim Anierobi <ep...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > +1 binding
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 20 Mar 2021, 09:44 Kevin Yang, <yr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > +1 binding
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:15 PM Daniel Imberman <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 binding. Really proud of this work, James!
> > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:50 PM, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 binding. It will make it better for a class of uses.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Xinbin Huang <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 non-binding. Looking forward to it!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:00 PM Ry Walker <ry...@rywalker.com> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > +1 binding - great work on this so far!
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:43 PM James Timmins <ja...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Hey team,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This email calls a vote to accept AIP-39:
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-39+Richer+scheduler_interval
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Discussion thread: https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf8eeb06493681f48dc9e82ce605a9c3a930cfee0b4ca19462a4e55b3%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is some on-going discussion about the best name for the classes, but it is agreed that this can be decided (and changed) at any point up until when this feature is released. (As we have done previously with Functional DAGs -> TaskFlow API).
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > This vote will last for 4 days until 2021-03-23 23:50 UTC, and until 3 binding votes have been cast.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=AIP-39+Voting+Deadline&iso=20210323T1650&p1=137
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Consider this my +1 (binding). Reminder: committer and PMC votes are both binding on AIP votes. All community members are encouraged to vote.
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Cheers,
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > James Timmins and Ash Berlin-Taylor
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Sent from Gmail Mobile
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > > > > > +48 660 796 129
Re: [VOTE] AIP-39: Richer scheduler_interval
Posted by Elad Kalif <el...@apache.org>.
+1 (binding)
Looks really good!
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 5:13 AM Vikram Koka <vi...@astronomer.io.invalid>
wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> Really good work on this James and Ash. Looking forward to seeing you take
> shape.
>
> Best regards,
> Vikram
>
>
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 2:43 PM Ryan Hamilton
> <ry...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>
>> +1 binding
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 8:41 AM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 (binding).
>>>
>>> This looks awesome, good work James & Ash.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Kaxil
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021, 11:47 Ephraim Anierobi <ep...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 binding
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, 20 Mar 2021, 09:44 Kevin Yang, <yr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 binding
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:15 PM Daniel Imberman <
>>>>> daniel.imberman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 binding. Really proud of this work, James!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:50 PM, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 binding. It will make it better for a class of uses.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Xinbin Huang <bi...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 non-binding. Looking forward to it!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:00 PM Ry Walker <ry...@rywalker.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> +1 binding - great work on this so far!
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:43 PM James Timmins
>>>>>>>> <ja...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hey team,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This email calls a vote to accept AIP-39:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-39+Richer+scheduler_interval
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Discussion thread:
>>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf8eeb06493681f48dc9e82ce605a9c3a930cfee0b4ca19462a4e55b3%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> There is some on-going discussion about the best name for the
>>>>>>>>> classes, but it is agreed that this can be decided (and changed) at any
>>>>>>>>> point up until when this feature is released. (As we have done previously
>>>>>>>>> with Functional DAGs -> TaskFlow API).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> This vote will last for 4 days until 2021-03-23 23:50 UTC, and
>>>>>>>>> until 3 binding votes have been cast.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=AIP-39+Voting+Deadline&iso=20210323T1650&p1=137
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Consider this my +1 (binding). Reminder: committer and PMC votes
>>>>>>>>> are both binding on AIP votes. All community members are encouraged to vote.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>> James Timmins and Ash Berlin-Taylor
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] AIP-39: Richer scheduler_interval
Posted by Vikram Koka <vi...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
+1 binding
Really good work on this James and Ash. Looking forward to seeing you take
shape.
Best regards,
Vikram
On Sun, Mar 21, 2021 at 2:43 PM Ryan Hamilton
<ry...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 8:41 AM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 (binding).
>>
>> This looks awesome, good work James & Ash.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Kaxil
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021, 11:47 Ephraim Anierobi <ep...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 binding
>>>
>>> On Sat, 20 Mar 2021, 09:44 Kevin Yang, <yr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 binding
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:15 PM Daniel Imberman <
>>>> daniel.imberman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 binding. Really proud of this work, James!
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:50 PM, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 binding. It will make it better for a class of uses.
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Xinbin Huang <bi...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 non-binding. Looking forward to it!
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:00 PM Ry Walker <ry...@rywalker.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> +1 binding - great work on this so far!
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:43 PM James Timmins
>>>>>>> <ja...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hey team,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This email calls a vote to accept AIP-39:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-39+Richer+scheduler_interval
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Discussion thread:
>>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf8eeb06493681f48dc9e82ce605a9c3a930cfee0b4ca19462a4e55b3%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> There is some on-going discussion about the best name for the
>>>>>>>> classes, but it is agreed that this can be decided (and changed) at any
>>>>>>>> point up until when this feature is released. (As we have done previously
>>>>>>>> with Functional DAGs -> TaskFlow API).
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This vote will last for 4 days until 2021-03-23 23:50 UTC, and
>>>>>>>> until 3 binding votes have been cast.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=AIP-39+Voting+Deadline&iso=20210323T1650&p1=137
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Consider this my +1 (binding). Reminder: committer and PMC votes
>>>>>>>> are both binding on AIP votes. All community members are encouraged to vote.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>> James Timmins and Ash Berlin-Taylor
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
>>>>>
>>>>>
Re: [VOTE] AIP-39: Richer scheduler_interval
Posted by Ryan Hamilton <ry...@astronomer.io.INVALID>.
+1 binding
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 8:41 AM Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding).
>
> This looks awesome, good work James & Ash.
>
> Regards,
> Kaxil
>
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021, 11:47 Ephraim Anierobi <ep...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 binding
>>
>> On Sat, 20 Mar 2021, 09:44 Kevin Yang, <yr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 binding
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:15 PM Daniel Imberman <
>>> daniel.imberman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 binding. Really proud of this work, James!
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:50 PM, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> +1 binding. It will make it better for a class of uses.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Xinbin Huang <bi...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 non-binding. Looking forward to it!
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:00 PM Ry Walker <ry...@rywalker.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 binding - great work on this so far!
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:43 PM James Timmins
>>>>>> <ja...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hey team,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This email calls a vote to accept AIP-39:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-39+Richer+scheduler_interval
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Discussion thread:
>>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf8eeb06493681f48dc9e82ce605a9c3a930cfee0b4ca19462a4e55b3%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> There is some on-going discussion about the best name for the
>>>>>>> classes, but it is agreed that this can be decided (and changed) at any
>>>>>>> point up until when this feature is released. (As we have done previously
>>>>>>> with Functional DAGs -> TaskFlow API).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> This vote will last for 4 days until 2021-03-23 23:50 UTC, and until
>>>>>>> 3 binding votes have been cast.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=AIP-39+Voting+Deadline&iso=20210323T1650&p1=137
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Consider this my +1 (binding). Reminder: committer and PMC votes are
>>>>>>> both binding on AIP votes. All community members are encouraged to vote.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> James Timmins and Ash Berlin-Taylor
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
>>>>
>>>>
Re: [VOTE] AIP-39: Richer scheduler_interval
Posted by Kaxil Naik <ka...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding).
This looks awesome, good work James & Ash.
Regards,
Kaxil
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021, 11:47 Ephraim Anierobi <ep...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> On Sat, 20 Mar 2021, 09:44 Kevin Yang, <yr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 binding
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:15 PM Daniel Imberman <
>> daniel.imberman@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 binding. Really proud of this work, James!
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:50 PM, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> +1 binding. It will make it better for a class of uses.
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Xinbin Huang <bi...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 non-binding. Looking forward to it!
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:00 PM Ry Walker <ry...@rywalker.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1 binding - great work on this so far!
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:43 PM James Timmins
>>>>> <ja...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey team,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This email calls a vote to accept AIP-39:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-39+Richer+scheduler_interval
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Discussion thread:
>>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf8eeb06493681f48dc9e82ce605a9c3a930cfee0b4ca19462a4e55b3%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There is some on-going discussion about the best name for the
>>>>>> classes, but it is agreed that this can be decided (and changed) at any
>>>>>> point up until when this feature is released. (As we have done previously
>>>>>> with Functional DAGs -> TaskFlow API).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This vote will last for 4 days until 2021-03-23 23:50 UTC, and until
>>>>>> 3 binding votes have been cast.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=AIP-39+Voting+Deadline&iso=20210323T1650&p1=137
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Consider this my +1 (binding). Reminder: committer and PMC votes are
>>>>>> both binding on AIP votes. All community members are encouraged to vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>> James Timmins and Ash Berlin-Taylor
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] AIP-39: Richer scheduler_interval
Posted by Ephraim Anierobi <ep...@gmail.com>.
+1 binding
On Sat, 20 Mar 2021, 09:44 Kevin Yang, <yr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 binding
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:15 PM Daniel Imberman <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 binding. Really proud of this work, James!
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:50 PM, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1 binding. It will make it better for a class of uses.
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Xinbin Huang <bi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 non-binding. Looking forward to it!
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:00 PM Ry Walker <ry...@rywalker.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 binding - great work on this so far!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:43 PM James Timmins
>>>> <ja...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey team,
>>>>>
>>>>> This email calls a vote to accept AIP-39:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-39+Richer+scheduler_interval
>>>>>
>>>>> Discussion thread:
>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf8eeb06493681f48dc9e82ce605a9c3a930cfee0b4ca19462a4e55b3%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
>>>>>
>>>>> There is some on-going discussion about the best name for the classes,
>>>>> but it is agreed that this can be decided (and changed) at any point up
>>>>> until when this feature is released. (As we have done previously with
>>>>> Functional DAGs -> TaskFlow API).
>>>>>
>>>>> This vote will last for 4 days until 2021-03-23 23:50 UTC, and until 3
>>>>> binding votes have been cast.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=AIP-39+Voting+Deadline&iso=20210323T1650&p1=137
>>>>>
>>>>> Consider this my +1 (binding). Reminder: committer and PMC votes are
>>>>> both binding on AIP votes. All community members are encouraged to vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> James Timmins and Ash Berlin-Taylor
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] AIP-39: Richer scheduler_interval
Posted by Ash Berlin-Taylor <as...@apache.org>.
+1 binding
On 20 March 2021 08:44:18 GMT, Kevin Yang <yr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>+1 binding
>
>On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:15 PM Daniel Imberman <da...@gmail.com>
>wrote:
>
>> +1 binding. Really proud of this work, James!
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:50 PM, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>>
>> +1 binding. It will make it better for a class of uses.
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Xinbin Huang <bi...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 non-binding. Looking forward to it!
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:00 PM Ry Walker <ry...@rywalker.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1 binding - great work on this so far!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:43 PM James Timmins
>>>> <ja...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hey team,
>>>>>
>>>>> This email calls a vote to accept AIP-39:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-39+Richer+scheduler_interval
>>>>>
>>>>> Discussion thread:
>>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf8eeb06493681f48dc9e82ce605a9c3a930cfee0b4ca19462a4e55b3%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
>>>>>
>>>>> There is some on-going discussion about the best name for the classes,
>>>>> but it is agreed that this can be decided (and changed) at any point up
>>>>> until when this feature is released. (As we have done previously with
>>>>> Functional DAGs -> TaskFlow API).
>>>>>
>>>>> This vote will last for 4 days until 2021-03-23 23:50 UTC, and until 3
>>>>> binding votes have been cast.
>>>>>
>>>>> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=AIP-39+Voting+Deadline&iso=20210323T1650&p1=137
>>>>>
>>>>> Consider this my +1 (binding). Reminder: committer and PMC votes are
>>>>> both binding on AIP votes. All community members are encouraged to vote.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> James Timmins and Ash Berlin-Taylor
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> --
>> +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] AIP-39: Richer scheduler_interval
Posted by Kevin Yang <yr...@gmail.com>.
+1 binding
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:15 PM Daniel Imberman <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> +1 binding. Really proud of this work, James!
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:50 PM, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
>
> +1 binding. It will make it better for a class of uses.
>
> On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Xinbin Huang <bi...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> +1 non-binding. Looking forward to it!
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:00 PM Ry Walker <ry...@rywalker.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 binding - great work on this so far!
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:43 PM James Timmins
>>> <ja...@astronomer.io.invalid> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hey team,
>>>>
>>>> This email calls a vote to accept AIP-39:
>>>>
>>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-39+Richer+scheduler_interval
>>>>
>>>> Discussion thread:
>>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf8eeb06493681f48dc9e82ce605a9c3a930cfee0b4ca19462a4e55b3%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
>>>>
>>>> There is some on-going discussion about the best name for the classes,
>>>> but it is agreed that this can be decided (and changed) at any point up
>>>> until when this feature is released. (As we have done previously with
>>>> Functional DAGs -> TaskFlow API).
>>>>
>>>> This vote will last for 4 days until 2021-03-23 23:50 UTC, and until 3
>>>> binding votes have been cast.
>>>>
>>>> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=AIP-39+Voting+Deadline&iso=20210323T1650&p1=137
>>>>
>>>> Consider this my +1 (binding). Reminder: committer and PMC votes are
>>>> both binding on AIP votes. All community members are encouraged to vote.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> James Timmins and Ash Berlin-Taylor
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>>
>>
>
> --
> +48 660 796 129 <+48660796129>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] AIP-39: Richer scheduler_interval
Posted by Daniel Imberman <da...@gmail.com>.
+1 binding. Really proud of this work, James!
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:50 PM, Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com> wrote:
+1 binding. It will make it better for a class of uses.
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Xinbin Huang < bin.huangxb@gmail.com
[bin.huangxb@gmail.com] > wrote:
+1 non-binding. Looking forward to it!
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:00 PM Ry Walker < ry@rywalker.com
[ry@rywalker.com] > wrote:
+1 binding - great work on this so far!
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:43 PM James Timmins <ja...@astronomer.io.invalid>
wrote:
Hey team,
This email calls a vote to accept AIP-39:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-39+Richer+scheduler_interval
[https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-39+Richer+scheduler_interval]
Discussion thread:
https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf8eeb06493681f48dc9e82ce605a9c3a930cfee0b4ca19462a4e55b3%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
[https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf8eeb06493681f48dc9e82ce605a9c3a930cfee0b4ca19462a4e55b3%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E]
There is some on-going discussion about the best name for the classes, but
it is agreed that this can be decided (and changed) at any point up until
when this feature is released. (As we have done previously with Functional
DAGs -> TaskFlow API).
This vote will last for 4 days until 2021-03-23 23:50 UTC, and until 3
binding votes have been cast.
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=AIP-39+Voting+Deadline&iso=20210323T1650&p1=137
[https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=AIP-39+Voting+Deadline&iso=20210323T1650&p1=137]
Consider this my +1 (binding). Reminder: committer and PMC votes are both
binding on AIP votes. All community members are encouraged to vote.
Cheers, James Timmins and Ash Berlin-Taylor --
Sent from Gmail Mobile
--
+48 660 796 129
Re: [VOTE] AIP-39: Richer scheduler_interval
Posted by Jarek Potiuk <ja...@potiuk.com>.
+1 binding. It will make it better for a class of uses.
On Sat, Mar 20, 2021 at 2:44 AM Xinbin Huang <bi...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 non-binding. Looking forward to it!
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:00 PM Ry Walker <ry...@rywalker.com> wrote:
>
>> +1 binding - great work on this so far!
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:43 PM James Timmins <ja...@astronomer.io.invalid>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hey team,
>>>
>>> This email calls a vote to accept AIP-39:
>>>
>>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-39+Richer+scheduler_interval
>>>
>>> Discussion thread:
>>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf8eeb06493681f48dc9e82ce605a9c3a930cfee0b4ca19462a4e55b3%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
>>>
>>> There is some on-going discussion about the best name for the classes,
>>> but it is agreed that this can be decided (and changed) at any point up
>>> until when this feature is released. (As we have done previously with
>>> Functional DAGs -> TaskFlow API).
>>>
>>> This vote will last for 4 days until 2021-03-23 23:50 UTC, and until 3
>>> binding votes have been cast.
>>>
>>> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=AIP-39+Voting+Deadline&iso=20210323T1650&p1=137
>>>
>>> Consider this my +1 (binding). Reminder: committer and PMC votes are
>>> both binding on AIP votes. All community members are encouraged to vote.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> James Timmins and Ash Berlin-Taylor
>>>
>> --
>> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>>
>
--
+48 660 796 129
Re: [VOTE] AIP-39: Richer scheduler_interval
Posted by Xinbin Huang <bi...@gmail.com>.
+1 non-binding. Looking forward to it!
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 6:00 PM Ry Walker <ry...@rywalker.com> wrote:
> +1 binding - great work on this so far!
>
>
> On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:43 PM James Timmins <ja...@astronomer.io.invalid>
> wrote:
>
>> Hey team,
>>
>> This email calls a vote to accept AIP-39:
>>
>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-39+Richer+scheduler_interval
>>
>> Discussion thread:
>> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf8eeb06493681f48dc9e82ce605a9c3a930cfee0b4ca19462a4e55b3%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
>>
>> There is some on-going discussion about the best name for the classes,
>> but it is agreed that this can be decided (and changed) at any point up
>> until when this feature is released. (As we have done previously with
>> Functional DAGs -> TaskFlow API).
>>
>> This vote will last for 4 days until 2021-03-23 23:50 UTC, and until 3
>> binding votes have been cast.
>>
>> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=AIP-39+Voting+Deadline&iso=20210323T1650&p1=137
>>
>> Consider this my +1 (binding). Reminder: committer and PMC votes are both
>> binding on AIP votes. All community members are encouraged to vote.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> James Timmins and Ash Berlin-Taylor
>>
> --
> Sent from Gmail Mobile
>
Re: [VOTE] AIP-39: Richer scheduler_interval
Posted by Ry Walker <ry...@rywalker.com>.
+1 binding - great work on this so far!
On Fri, Mar 19, 2021 at 7:43 PM James Timmins <ja...@astronomer.io.invalid>
wrote:
> Hey team,
>
> This email calls a vote to accept AIP-39:
>
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/AIRFLOW/AIP-39+Richer+scheduler_interval
>
> Discussion thread:
> https://lists.apache.org/thread.html/rf8eeb06493681f48dc9e82ce605a9c3a930cfee0b4ca19462a4e55b3%40%3Cdev.airflow.apache.org%3E
>
> There is some on-going discussion about the best name for the classes, but
> it is agreed that this can be decided (and changed) at any point up until
> when this feature is released. (As we have done previously with Functional
> DAGs -> TaskFlow API).
>
> This vote will last for 4 days until 2021-03-23 23:50 UTC, and until 3
> binding votes have been cast.
>
> https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=AIP-39+Voting+Deadline&iso=20210323T1650&p1=137
>
> Consider this my +1 (binding). Reminder: committer and PMC votes are both
> binding on AIP votes. All community members are encouraged to vote.
>
> Cheers,
> James Timmins and Ash Berlin-Taylor
>
--
Sent from Gmail Mobile