You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@ranger.apache.org by "Mehul Parikh (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/04/14 13:33:25 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (RANGER-846) Ranger deviates from Hadoop usernames

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-846?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Mehul Parikh updated RANGER-846:
--------------------------------
    Assignee: Mehul Parikh

> Ranger deviates from Hadoop usernames
> -------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: RANGER-846
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/RANGER-846
>             Project: Ranger
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: admin
>    Affects Versions: 0.5.0, 0.5.1, 0.5.2, 0.6.0
>         Environment: kerberos non-kerberos
>            Reporter: Bolke de Bruin
>            Assignee: Mehul Parikh
>            Priority: Critical
>              Labels: admin-interface, kerberos, user
>             Fix For: 0.6.0
>
>
> Ranger-admin deviates from Hadoop (hadoop-auth) in determining what is a username and implements its own check. If not using hadoop-auth why is this not left to the underlying OS?
> This is perfectly fine on the OS and will be per HADOOP-12751 (Before HADOOP-12751 '@' and '/' were not allowed).
> [root@hdp-node pam.d]# id bolke@ad.local
> UID=1796201107(bolke@ad.local) GID=1796201107(bolke@ad.local) groepen=1796201107(bolke@ad.local),1796200513(domain users@ad.local),1796201108(test@ad.local),1950000004(ad_users)
> Not being able to do this creates integration issues when using trusts in active directory domain contexts (ie. the above bolke@ad.local is a user from a trusted domain)



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)