You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mahout.apache.org by Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com> on 2017/03/18 18:59:20 UTC

New RC?

Are we cutting a new RC this weekend?

tg

Trevor Grant
Data Scientist
https://github.com/rawkintrevo
http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
http://trevorgrant.org

*"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*

RE: New RC?

Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
Yeah please do, I just cut and pasted son instructions that I sent out the other day.. and didn't have much time..

Tge pasting in could be awkward..

I will go over them again too..

Thx alot



Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
Date: 03/19/2017 3:04 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: New RC?

I can look later tonight after chores.

On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 2:48 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:

> With the exception of the PR that I just opened
> https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/297
>
>
> <https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/297>
>
> (please review, ^^) <https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/297> the board
> is back to clean..
>
>
> So we should be close to ready for a new RC After that's out.  Could
> everybody please take stock for a minute and be sure that everything
> questionable to is good to go?
>
>
> Could someone please double check
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=149&view=detail&selectedIssue=MAHOUT-1957
> and make sure that the pom in question is all set?
>
>
> If all that's good I think that we're all set.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 5:12:46 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New RC?
>
>
> +1 to a java only RC.. I bumped the issue that I'd created yesterday for
> the binaries to 0.13.1, and moved the readme.md issue down from critical
> to blocker.
>
>
> Gonna work on that real quick right now.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 3:38:46 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New RC?
>
> Makes sense to me, I can’t test the 2 GPU versions.  If 0.13.0 that is
> java only do we have an RC or code freeze to test?
>
>
> On Mar 18, 2017, at 1:43 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> Or rather if you're both in favor of it.. get the source/java only version
> out as 0.13.0 and follow up with automated building g and testing framework
> for 0.13.1.
>
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> Date: 03/18/2017 1:40 PM (GMT-08:00)
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: RE: New RC?
>
> Ok.. let's revisit after we get first out the door.
>
>
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> Date: 03/18/2017 1:34 PM (GMT-08:00)
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New RC?
>
> That's what I'd prefer too.
>
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm yes and no about that.
> >
> > Yes- because, yea awesome.
> >
> > no- bc of limited testing bandwidth.
> >
> > I'd be more in favor of lets push 0.13.0 with minimal binary support, and
> > then get IT testing all sured up (MAHOUT-1949) and then do another
> release
> > soon, with very little additional code, but add native solvers and spark
> > 2.0/scala 2.11 binaries
> >
> > e.g. lets just get the current one out the door and then focus on
> > automation to make future release cycles quicker and less painful.
> >
> > just my .02
> >
> > tg
> >
> > Trevor Grant
> > Data Scientist
> > https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> > http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> > http://trevorgrant.org
> >
> > *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Ahh.. thats true.. they should be added in with profiles, so they're
> only
> >> activated when the distribution is built specifically for them.
> >>
> >>
> >> ReE: the distribution, I'd like to put three out.. one java only, one
> >> java/OpenMP, and one Java/OpenMP/OpenCL.
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> >> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 3:59:48 PM
> >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: New RC?
> >>
> >> I didn't realize we had intended to add viennaCl jars to binary
> >> distibution... Cool if we do though.
> >>
> >> tg
> >>
> >> Trevor Grant
> >> Data Scientist
> >> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> >> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> >> http://trevorgrant.org
> >>
> >> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I think we have a few minor changes that we could add (updating
> >> readme.md
> >>> eg..).. but more importantly when going through the poms this week, I
> >>> noticed that the viennacl jars are not being added to the binary
> >>> distribution artifact.
> >>>
> >>>  Have not started a jira for it because I'm unsure of the fix, but
> > I'll
> >>> add one shortly.. def a blocker though.. until that is fixed No need
> > for
> >> an
> >>> RC IMO.
> >>>
> >>> Andy
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my Galaxy Tab A
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -------- Original message --------
> >>> From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> >>> Date: 3/18/17 2:59 PM (GMT-05:00)
> >>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> >>> Subject: New RC?
> >>>
> >>> Are we cutting a new RC this weekend?
> >>>
> >>> tg
> >>>
> >>> Trevor Grant
> >>> Data Scientist
> >>> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> >>> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> >>> http://trevorgrant.org
> >>>
> >>> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>

Re: New RC?

Posted by Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>.
I can look later tonight after chores.

On Sun, Mar 19, 2017 at 2:48 PM Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:

> With the exception of the PR that I just opened
> https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/297
>
>
> <https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/297>
>
> (please review, ^^) <https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/297> the board
> is back to clean..
>
>
> So we should be close to ready for a new RC After that's out.  Could
> everybody please take stock for a minute and be sure that everything
> questionable to is good to go?
>
>
> Could someone please double check
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=149&view=detail&selectedIssue=MAHOUT-1957
> and make sure that the pom in question is all set?
>
>
> If all that's good I think that we're all set.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 5:12:46 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New RC?
>
>
> +1 to a java only RC.. I bumped the issue that I'd created yesterday for
> the binaries to 0.13.1, and moved the readme.md issue down from critical
> to blocker.
>
>
> Gonna work on that real quick right now.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
> Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 3:38:46 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New RC?
>
> Makes sense to me, I can’t test the 2 GPU versions.  If 0.13.0 that is
> java only do we have an RC or code freeze to test?
>
>
> On Mar 18, 2017, at 1:43 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:
>
> Or rather if you're both in favor of it.. get the source/java only version
> out as 0.13.0 and follow up with automated building g and testing framework
> for 0.13.1.
>
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> Date: 03/18/2017 1:40 PM (GMT-08:00)
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: RE: New RC?
>
> Ok.. let's revisit after we get first out the door.
>
>
>
>
> Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
> Date: 03/18/2017 1:34 PM (GMT-08:00)
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New RC?
>
> That's what I'd prefer too.
>
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm yes and no about that.
> >
> > Yes- because, yea awesome.
> >
> > no- bc of limited testing bandwidth.
> >
> > I'd be more in favor of lets push 0.13.0 with minimal binary support, and
> > then get IT testing all sured up (MAHOUT-1949) and then do another
> release
> > soon, with very little additional code, but add native solvers and spark
> > 2.0/scala 2.11 binaries
> >
> > e.g. lets just get the current one out the door and then focus on
> > automation to make future release cycles quicker and less painful.
> >
> > just my .02
> >
> > tg
> >
> > Trevor Grant
> > Data Scientist
> > https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> > http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> > http://trevorgrant.org
> >
> > *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> Ahh.. thats true.. they should be added in with profiles, so they're
> only
> >> activated when the distribution is built specifically for them.
> >>
> >>
> >> ReE: the distribution, I'd like to put three out.. one java only, one
> >> java/OpenMP, and one Java/OpenMP/OpenCL.
> >>
> >> ________________________________
> >> From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> >> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 3:59:48 PM
> >> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> >> Subject: Re: New RC?
> >>
> >> I didn't realize we had intended to add viennaCl jars to binary
> >> distibution... Cool if we do though.
> >>
> >> tg
> >>
> >> Trevor Grant
> >> Data Scientist
> >> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> >> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> >> http://trevorgrant.org
> >>
> >> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> I think we have a few minor changes that we could add (updating
> >> readme.md
> >>> eg..).. but more importantly when going through the poms this week, I
> >>> noticed that the viennacl jars are not being added to the binary
> >>> distribution artifact.
> >>>
> >>>  Have not started a jira for it because I'm unsure of the fix, but
> > I'll
> >>> add one shortly.. def a blocker though.. until that is fixed No need
> > for
> >> an
> >>> RC IMO.
> >>>
> >>> Andy
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Sent from my Galaxy Tab A
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> -------- Original message --------
> >>> From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> >>> Date: 3/18/17 2:59 PM (GMT-05:00)
> >>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> >>> Subject: New RC?
> >>>
> >>> Are we cutting a new RC this weekend?
> >>>
> >>> tg
> >>>
> >>> Trevor Grant
> >>> Data Scientist
> >>> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> >>> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> >>> http://trevorgrant.org
> >>>
> >>> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
>

Re: New RC?

Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
With the exception of the PR that I just opened https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/297


<https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/297>

(please review, ^^) <https://github.com/apache/mahout/pull/297> the board is back to clean..


So we should be close to ready for a new RC After that's out.  Could everybody please take stock for a minute and be sure that everything questionable to is good to go?


Could someone please double check https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=149&view=detail&selectedIssue=MAHOUT-1957 and make sure that the pom in question is all set?


If all that's good I think that we're all set.

________________________________
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 5:12:46 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: New RC?


+1 to a java only RC.. I bumped the issue that I'd created yesterday for the binaries to 0.13.1, and moved the readme.md issue down from critical to blocker.


Gonna work on that real quick right now.

________________________________
From: Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 3:38:46 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: New RC?

Makes sense to me, I can’t test the 2 GPU versions.  If 0.13.0 that is java only do we have an RC or code freeze to test?


On Mar 18, 2017, at 1:43 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:

Or rather if you're both in favor of it.. get the source/java only version out as 0.13.0 and follow up with automated building g and testing framework for 0.13.1.



Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
Date: 03/18/2017 1:40 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: RE: New RC?

Ok.. let's revisit after we get first out the door.




Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
Date: 03/18/2017 1:34 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: New RC?

That's what I'd prefer too.

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'm yes and no about that.
>
> Yes- because, yea awesome.
>
> no- bc of limited testing bandwidth.
>
> I'd be more in favor of lets push 0.13.0 with minimal binary support, and
> then get IT testing all sured up (MAHOUT-1949) and then do another release
> soon, with very little additional code, but add native solvers and spark
> 2.0/scala 2.11 binaries
>
> e.g. lets just get the current one out the door and then focus on
> automation to make future release cycles quicker and less painful.
>
> just my .02
>
> tg
>
> Trevor Grant
> Data Scientist
> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> http://trevorgrant.org
>
> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Ahh.. thats true.. they should be added in with profiles, so they're only
>> activated when the distribution is built specifically for them.
>>
>>
>> ReE: the distribution, I'd like to put three out.. one java only, one
>> java/OpenMP, and one Java/OpenMP/OpenCL.
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 3:59:48 PM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: New RC?
>>
>> I didn't realize we had intended to add viennaCl jars to binary
>> distibution... Cool if we do though.
>>
>> tg
>>
>> Trevor Grant
>> Data Scientist
>> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
>> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
>> http://trevorgrant.org
>>
>> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think we have a few minor changes that we could add (updating
>> readme.md
>>> eg..).. but more importantly when going through the poms this week, I
>>> noticed that the viennacl jars are not being added to the binary
>>> distribution artifact.
>>>
>>>  Have not started a jira for it because I'm unsure of the fix, but
> I'll
>>> add one shortly.. def a blocker though.. until that is fixed No need
> for
>> an
>>> RC IMO.
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my Galaxy Tab A
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Original message --------
>>> From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
>>> Date: 3/18/17 2:59 PM (GMT-05:00)
>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>> Subject: New RC?
>>>
>>> Are we cutting a new RC this weekend?
>>>
>>> tg
>>>
>>> Trevor Grant
>>> Data Scientist
>>> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
>>> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
>>> http://trevorgrant.org
>>>
>>> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
>>>
>>
>

Re: New RC?

Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
+1 to a java only RC.. I bumped the issue that I'd created yesterday for the binaries to 0.13.1, and moved the readme.md issue down from critical to blocker.


Gonna work on that real quick right now.

________________________________
From: Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>
Sent: Sunday, March 19, 2017 3:38:46 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: New RC?

Makes sense to me, I can’t test the 2 GPU versions.  If 0.13.0 that is java only do we have an RC or code freeze to test?


On Mar 18, 2017, at 1:43 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:

Or rather if you're both in favor of it.. get the source/java only version out as 0.13.0 and follow up with automated building g and testing framework for 0.13.1.



Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
Date: 03/18/2017 1:40 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: RE: New RC?

Ok.. let's revisit after we get first out the door.




Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
Date: 03/18/2017 1:34 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: New RC?

That's what I'd prefer too.

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'm yes and no about that.
>
> Yes- because, yea awesome.
>
> no- bc of limited testing bandwidth.
>
> I'd be more in favor of lets push 0.13.0 with minimal binary support, and
> then get IT testing all sured up (MAHOUT-1949) and then do another release
> soon, with very little additional code, but add native solvers and spark
> 2.0/scala 2.11 binaries
>
> e.g. lets just get the current one out the door and then focus on
> automation to make future release cycles quicker and less painful.
>
> just my .02
>
> tg
>
> Trevor Grant
> Data Scientist
> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> http://trevorgrant.org
>
> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Ahh.. thats true.. they should be added in with profiles, so they're only
>> activated when the distribution is built specifically for them.
>>
>>
>> ReE: the distribution, I'd like to put three out.. one java only, one
>> java/OpenMP, and one Java/OpenMP/OpenCL.
>>
>> ________________________________
>> From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 3:59:48 PM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: New RC?
>>
>> I didn't realize we had intended to add viennaCl jars to binary
>> distibution... Cool if we do though.
>>
>> tg
>>
>> Trevor Grant
>> Data Scientist
>> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
>> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
>> http://trevorgrant.org
>>
>> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I think we have a few minor changes that we could add (updating
>> readme.md
>>> eg..).. but more importantly when going through the poms this week, I
>>> noticed that the viennacl jars are not being added to the binary
>>> distribution artifact.
>>>
>>>  Have not started a jira for it because I'm unsure of the fix, but
> I'll
>>> add one shortly.. def a blocker though.. until that is fixed No need
> for
>> an
>>> RC IMO.
>>>
>>> Andy
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Sent from my Galaxy Tab A
>>>
>>>
>>> -------- Original message --------
>>> From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
>>> Date: 3/18/17 2:59 PM (GMT-05:00)
>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>> Subject: New RC?
>>>
>>> Are we cutting a new RC this weekend?
>>>
>>> tg
>>>
>>> Trevor Grant
>>> Data Scientist
>>> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
>>> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
>>> http://trevorgrant.org
>>>
>>> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
>>>
>>
>

Re: New RC?

Posted by Pat Ferrel <pa...@occamsmachete.com>.
Makes sense to me, I can’t test the 2 GPU versions.  If 0.13.0 that is java only do we have an RC or code freeze to test?


On Mar 18, 2017, at 1:43 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:

Or rather if you're both in favor of it.. get the source/java only version out as 0.13.0 and follow up with automated building g and testing framework for 0.13.1.



Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
Date: 03/18/2017 1:40 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: RE: New RC?

Ok.. let's revisit after we get first out the door.




Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
Date: 03/18/2017 1:34 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: New RC?

That's what I'd prefer too.

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'm yes and no about that.
> 
> Yes- because, yea awesome.
> 
> no- bc of limited testing bandwidth.
> 
> I'd be more in favor of lets push 0.13.0 with minimal binary support, and
> then get IT testing all sured up (MAHOUT-1949) and then do another release
> soon, with very little additional code, but add native solvers and spark
> 2.0/scala 2.11 binaries
> 
> e.g. lets just get the current one out the door and then focus on
> automation to make future release cycles quicker and less painful.
> 
> just my .02
> 
> tg
> 
> Trevor Grant
> Data Scientist
> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> http://trevorgrant.org
> 
> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
> 
> 
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> wrote:
> 
>> Ahh.. thats true.. they should be added in with profiles, so they're only
>> activated when the distribution is built specifically for them.
>> 
>> 
>> ReE: the distribution, I'd like to put three out.. one java only, one
>> java/OpenMP, and one Java/OpenMP/OpenCL.
>> 
>> ________________________________
>> From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 3:59:48 PM
>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: New RC?
>> 
>> I didn't realize we had intended to add viennaCl jars to binary
>> distibution... Cool if we do though.
>> 
>> tg
>> 
>> Trevor Grant
>> Data Scientist
>> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
>> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
>> http://trevorgrant.org
>> 
>> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
>> 
>> 
>> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> I think we have a few minor changes that we could add (updating
>> readme.md
>>> eg..).. but more importantly when going through the poms this week, I
>>> noticed that the viennacl jars are not being added to the binary
>>> distribution artifact.
>>> 
>>>  Have not started a jira for it because I'm unsure of the fix, but
> I'll
>>> add one shortly.. def a blocker though.. until that is fixed No need
> for
>> an
>>> RC IMO.
>>> 
>>> Andy
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Sent from my Galaxy Tab A
>>> 
>>> 
>>> -------- Original message --------
>>> From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
>>> Date: 3/18/17 2:59 PM (GMT-05:00)
>>> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
>>> Subject: New RC?
>>> 
>>> Are we cutting a new RC this weekend?
>>> 
>>> tg
>>> 
>>> Trevor Grant
>>> Data Scientist
>>> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
>>> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
>>> http://trevorgrant.org
>>> 
>>> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
>>> 
>> 
>

RE: New RC?

Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
Or rather if you're both in favor of it.. get the source/java only version out as 0.13.0 and follow up with automated building g and testing framework for 0.13.1.



Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
Date: 03/18/2017 1:40 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: RE: New RC?

Ok.. let's revisit after we get first out the door.




Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
Date: 03/18/2017 1:34 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: New RC?

That's what I'd prefer too.

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'm yes and no about that.
>
> Yes- because, yea awesome.
>
> no- bc of limited testing bandwidth.
>
> I'd be more in favor of lets push 0.13.0 with minimal binary support, and
> then get IT testing all sured up (MAHOUT-1949) and then do another release
> soon, with very little additional code, but add native solvers and spark
> 2.0/scala 2.11 binaries
>
> e.g. lets just get the current one out the door and then focus on
> automation to make future release cycles quicker and less painful.
>
> just my .02
>
> tg
>
> Trevor Grant
> Data Scientist
> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> http://trevorgrant.org
>
> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Ahh.. thats true.. they should be added in with profiles, so they're only
> > activated when the distribution is built specifically for them.
> >
> >
> > ReE: the distribution, I'd like to put three out.. one java only, one
> > java/OpenMP, and one Java/OpenMP/OpenCL.
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 3:59:48 PM
> > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: New RC?
> >
> > I didn't realize we had intended to add viennaCl jars to binary
> > distibution... Cool if we do though.
> >
> > tg
> >
> > Trevor Grant
> > Data Scientist
> > https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> > http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> > http://trevorgrant.org
> >
> > *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think we have a few minor changes that we could add (updating
> > readme.md
> > > eg..).. but more importantly when going through the poms this week, I
> > > noticed that the viennacl jars are not being added to the binary
> > > distribution artifact.
> > >
> > >   Have not started a jira for it because I'm unsure of the fix, but
> I'll
> > > add one shortly.. def a blocker though.. until that is fixed No need
> for
> > an
> > > RC IMO.
> > >
> > > Andy
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Sent from my Galaxy Tab A
> > >
> > >
> > > -------- Original message --------
> > > From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> > > Date: 3/18/17 2:59 PM (GMT-05:00)
> > > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > Subject: New RC?
> > >
> > > Are we cutting a new RC this weekend?
> > >
> > > tg
> > >
> > > Trevor Grant
> > > Data Scientist
> > > https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> > > http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> > > http://trevorgrant.org
> > >
> > > *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
> > >
> >
>

RE: New RC?

Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
Ok.. let's revisit after we get first out the door.




Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>
Date: 03/18/2017 1:34 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: New RC?

That's what I'd prefer too.

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'm yes and no about that.
>
> Yes- because, yea awesome.
>
> no- bc of limited testing bandwidth.
>
> I'd be more in favor of lets push 0.13.0 with minimal binary support, and
> then get IT testing all sured up (MAHOUT-1949) and then do another release
> soon, with very little additional code, but add native solvers and spark
> 2.0/scala 2.11 binaries
>
> e.g. lets just get the current one out the door and then focus on
> automation to make future release cycles quicker and less painful.
>
> just my .02
>
> tg
>
> Trevor Grant
> Data Scientist
> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> http://trevorgrant.org
>
> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Ahh.. thats true.. they should be added in with profiles, so they're only
> > activated when the distribution is built specifically for them.
> >
> >
> > ReE: the distribution, I'd like to put three out.. one java only, one
> > java/OpenMP, and one Java/OpenMP/OpenCL.
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 3:59:48 PM
> > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: New RC?
> >
> > I didn't realize we had intended to add viennaCl jars to binary
> > distibution... Cool if we do though.
> >
> > tg
> >
> > Trevor Grant
> > Data Scientist
> > https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> > http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> > http://trevorgrant.org
> >
> > *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think we have a few minor changes that we could add (updating
> > readme.md
> > > eg..).. but more importantly when going through the poms this week, I
> > > noticed that the viennacl jars are not being added to the binary
> > > distribution artifact.
> > >
> > >   Have not started a jira for it because I'm unsure of the fix, but
> I'll
> > > add one shortly.. def a blocker though.. until that is fixed No need
> for
> > an
> > > RC IMO.
> > >
> > > Andy
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Sent from my Galaxy Tab A
> > >
> > >
> > > -------- Original message --------
> > > From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> > > Date: 3/18/17 2:59 PM (GMT-05:00)
> > > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > Subject: New RC?
> > >
> > > Are we cutting a new RC this weekend?
> > >
> > > tg
> > >
> > > Trevor Grant
> > > Data Scientist
> > > https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> > > http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> > > http://trevorgrant.org
> > >
> > > *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
> > >
> >
>

Re: New RC?

Posted by Andrew Musselman <an...@gmail.com>.
That's what I'd prefer too.

On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 1:28 PM, Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
wrote:

> I'm yes and no about that.
>
> Yes- because, yea awesome.
>
> no- bc of limited testing bandwidth.
>
> I'd be more in favor of lets push 0.13.0 with minimal binary support, and
> then get IT testing all sured up (MAHOUT-1949) and then do another release
> soon, with very little additional code, but add native solvers and spark
> 2.0/scala 2.11 binaries
>
> e.g. lets just get the current one out the door and then focus on
> automation to make future release cycles quicker and less painful.
>
> just my .02
>
> tg
>
> Trevor Grant
> Data Scientist
> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> http://trevorgrant.org
>
> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Ahh.. thats true.. they should be added in with profiles, so they're only
> > activated when the distribution is built specifically for them.
> >
> >
> > ReE: the distribution, I'd like to put three out.. one java only, one
> > java/OpenMP, and one Java/OpenMP/OpenCL.
> >
> > ________________________________
> > From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 3:59:48 PM
> > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: New RC?
> >
> > I didn't realize we had intended to add viennaCl jars to binary
> > distibution... Cool if we do though.
> >
> > tg
> >
> > Trevor Grant
> > Data Scientist
> > https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> > http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> > http://trevorgrant.org
> >
> > *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
> >
> >
> > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I think we have a few minor changes that we could add (updating
> > readme.md
> > > eg..).. but more importantly when going through the poms this week, I
> > > noticed that the viennacl jars are not being added to the binary
> > > distribution artifact.
> > >
> > >   Have not started a jira for it because I'm unsure of the fix, but
> I'll
> > > add one shortly.. def a blocker though.. until that is fixed No need
> for
> > an
> > > RC IMO.
> > >
> > > Andy
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Sent from my Galaxy Tab A
> > >
> > >
> > > -------- Original message --------
> > > From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> > > Date: 3/18/17 2:59 PM (GMT-05:00)
> > > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > > Subject: New RC?
> > >
> > > Are we cutting a new RC this weekend?
> > >
> > > tg
> > >
> > > Trevor Grant
> > > Data Scientist
> > > https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> > > http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> > > http://trevorgrant.org
> > >
> > > *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
> > >
> >
>

RE: New RC?

Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
Yeah I can see the upside to that def.  But having tested the sources so thoroughly. Testing the binaries would be less work ..

It is nice to able to just `wget https://some miror/mahout-0.13.0.tar.gz`

Let's revisit after we get the first java-only out the door.


Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
Date: 03/18/2017 1:28 PM (GMT-08:00)
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: New RC?

I'm yes and no about that.

Yes- because, yea awesome.

no- bc of limited testing bandwidth.

I'd be more in favor of lets push 0.13.0 with minimal binary support, and
then get IT testing all sured up (MAHOUT-1949) and then do another release
soon, with very little additional code, but add native solvers and spark
2.0/scala 2.11 binaries

e.g. lets just get the current one out the door and then focus on
automation to make future release cycles quicker and less painful.

just my .02

tg

Trevor Grant
Data Scientist
https://github.com/rawkintrevo
http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
http://trevorgrant.org

*"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*


On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:

> Ahh.. thats true.. they should be added in with profiles, so they're only
> activated when the distribution is built specifically for them.
>
>
> ReE: the distribution, I'd like to put three out.. one java only, one
> java/OpenMP, and one Java/OpenMP/OpenCL.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 3:59:48 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New RC?
>
> I didn't realize we had intended to add viennaCl jars to binary
> distibution... Cool if we do though.
>
> tg
>
> Trevor Grant
> Data Scientist
> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> http://trevorgrant.org
>
> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I think we have a few minor changes that we could add (updating
> readme.md
> > eg..).. but more importantly when going through the poms this week, I
> > noticed that the viennacl jars are not being added to the binary
> > distribution artifact.
> >
> >   Have not started a jira for it because I'm unsure of the fix, but I'll
> > add one shortly.. def a blocker though.. until that is fixed No need for
> an
> > RC IMO.
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent from my Galaxy Tab A
> >
> >
> > -------- Original message --------
> > From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> > Date: 3/18/17 2:59 PM (GMT-05:00)
> > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > Subject: New RC?
> >
> > Are we cutting a new RC this weekend?
> >
> > tg
> >
> > Trevor Grant
> > Data Scientist
> > https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> > http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> > http://trevorgrant.org
> >
> > *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
> >
>

Re: New RC?

Posted by Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>.
I'm yes and no about that.

Yes- because, yea awesome.

no- bc of limited testing bandwidth.

I'd be more in favor of lets push 0.13.0 with minimal binary support, and
then get IT testing all sured up (MAHOUT-1949) and then do another release
soon, with very little additional code, but add native solvers and spark
2.0/scala 2.11 binaries

e.g. lets just get the current one out the door and then focus on
automation to make future release cycles quicker and less painful.

just my .02

tg

Trevor Grant
Data Scientist
https://github.com/rawkintrevo
http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
http://trevorgrant.org

*"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*


On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 3:23 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:

> Ahh.. thats true.. they should be added in with profiles, so they're only
> activated when the distribution is built specifically for them.
>
>
> ReE: the distribution, I'd like to put three out.. one java only, one
> java/OpenMP, and one Java/OpenMP/OpenCL.
>
> ________________________________
> From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 3:59:48 PM
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: Re: New RC?
>
> I didn't realize we had intended to add viennaCl jars to binary
> distibution... Cool if we do though.
>
> tg
>
> Trevor Grant
> Data Scientist
> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> http://trevorgrant.org
>
> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I think we have a few minor changes that we could add (updating
> readme.md
> > eg..).. but more importantly when going through the poms this week, I
> > noticed that the viennacl jars are not being added to the binary
> > distribution artifact.
> >
> >   Have not started a jira for it because I'm unsure of the fix, but I'll
> > add one shortly.. def a blocker though.. until that is fixed No need for
> an
> > RC IMO.
> >
> > Andy
> >
> >
> >
> > Sent from my Galaxy Tab A
> >
> >
> > -------- Original message --------
> > From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> > Date: 3/18/17 2:59 PM (GMT-05:00)
> > To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> > Subject: New RC?
> >
> > Are we cutting a new RC this weekend?
> >
> > tg
> >
> > Trevor Grant
> > Data Scientist
> > https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> > http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> > http://trevorgrant.org
> >
> > *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
> >
>

Re: New RC?

Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
Ahh.. thats true.. they should be added in with profiles, so they're only activated when the distribution is built specifically for them.


ReE: the distribution, I'd like to put three out.. one java only, one java/OpenMP, and one Java/OpenMP/OpenCL.

________________________________
From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
Sent: Saturday, March 18, 2017 3:59:48 PM
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: Re: New RC?

I didn't realize we had intended to add viennaCl jars to binary
distibution... Cool if we do though.

tg

Trevor Grant
Data Scientist
https://github.com/rawkintrevo
http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
http://trevorgrant.org

*"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*


On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:

> I think we have a few minor changes that we could add (updating readme.md
> eg..).. but more importantly when going through the poms this week, I
> noticed that the viennacl jars are not being added to the binary
> distribution artifact.
>
>   Have not started a jira for it because I'm unsure of the fix, but I'll
> add one shortly.. def a blocker though.. until that is fixed No need for an
> RC IMO.
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> Sent from my Galaxy Tab A
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> Date: 3/18/17 2:59 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: New RC?
>
> Are we cutting a new RC this weekend?
>
> tg
>
> Trevor Grant
> Data Scientist
> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> http://trevorgrant.org
>
> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
>

Re: New RC?

Posted by Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>.
I didn't realize we had intended to add viennaCl jars to binary
distibution... Cool if we do though.

tg

Trevor Grant
Data Scientist
https://github.com/rawkintrevo
http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
http://trevorgrant.org

*"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*


On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 2:11 PM, Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com> wrote:

> I think we have a few minor changes that we could add (updating readme.md
> eg..).. but more importantly when going through the poms this week, I
> noticed that the viennacl jars are not being added to the binary
> distribution artifact.
>
>   Have not started a jira for it because I'm unsure of the fix, but I'll
> add one shortly.. def a blocker though.. until that is fixed No need for an
> RC IMO.
>
> Andy
>
>
>
> Sent from my Galaxy Tab A
>
>
> -------- Original message --------
> From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
> Date: 3/18/17 2:59 PM (GMT-05:00)
> To: dev@mahout.apache.org
> Subject: New RC?
>
> Are we cutting a new RC this weekend?
>
> tg
>
> Trevor Grant
> Data Scientist
> https://github.com/rawkintrevo
> http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
> http://trevorgrant.org
>
> *"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*
>

RE: New RC?

Posted by Andrew Palumbo <ap...@outlook.com>.
I think we have a few minor changes that we could add (updating readme.md eg..).. but more importantly when going through the poms this week, I noticed that the viennacl jars are not being added to the binary distribution artifact.

  Have not started a jira for it because I'm unsure of the fix, but I'll add one shortly.. def a blocker though.. until that is fixed No need for an RC IMO.

Andy



Sent from my Galaxy Tab A


-------- Original message --------
From: Trevor Grant <tr...@gmail.com>
Date: 3/18/17 2:59 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: dev@mahout.apache.org
Subject: New RC?

Are we cutting a new RC this weekend?

tg

Trevor Grant
Data Scientist
https://github.com/rawkintrevo
http://stackexchange.com/users/3002022/rawkintrevo
http://trevorgrant.org

*"Fortunate is he, who is able to know the causes of things."  -Virgil*