You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to hdfs-dev@hadoop.apache.org by "Liyin Liang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/01/13 06:48:45 UTC
[jira] Created: (HDFS-1583) Improve backup-node sync performance by
wrapping RPC parameters
Improve backup-node sync performance by wrapping RPC parameters
---------------------------------------------------------------
Key: HDFS-1583
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1583
Project: Hadoop HDFS
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: name-node
Reporter: Liyin Liang
The journal edit records are sent by the active name-node to the backup-node with RPC:
{code:}
public void journal(NamenodeRegistration registration,
int jAction,
int length,
byte[] records) throws IOException;
{code}
During the name-node throughput benchmark, the size of byte array _records_ is around *8000*. Then the serialization and deserialization is time-consuming. I wrote a simple application to test RPC with byte array parameter. When the size got to 8000, each RPC call need about 6 ms. While name-node sync 8k byte to local disk only need 0.3~0.4ms.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] [Resolved] (HDFS-1583) Improve backup-node sync performance
by wrapping RPC parameters
Posted by "Liyin Liang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1583?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Liyin Liang resolved HDFS-1583.
-------------------------------
Resolution: Fixed
This bug has been fixed by HADOOP-6949.
> Improve backup-node sync performance by wrapping RPC parameters
> ---------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HDFS-1583
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HDFS-1583
> Project: Hadoop HDFS
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: name-node
> Reporter: Liyin Liang
> Assignee: Liyin Liang
> Fix For: 0.23.0
>
> Attachments: HDFS-1583-1.patch, HDFS-1583-2.patch, test-rpc.diff
>
>
> The journal edit records are sent by the active name-node to the backup-node with RPC:
> {code:}
> public void journal(NamenodeRegistration registration,
> int jAction,
> int length,
> byte[] records) throws IOException;
> {code}
> During the name-node throughput benchmark, the size of byte array _records_ is around *8000*. Then the serialization and deserialization is time-consuming. I wrote a simple application to test RPC with byte array parameter. When the size got to 8000, each RPC call need about 6 ms. While name-node sync 8k byte to local disk only need 0.3~0.4ms.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira