You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openwhisk.apache.org by Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com> on 2018/06/29 12:37:46 UTC
[DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module
I am breaking this out into a DISCUSS thread so not to pollute the vote. In
completing this checking list:
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo.
[x] All files have license headers if necessary. (checked with scan-code)
[x] No compiled archives bundled in source archive (modulo
gradle-wrapper.jar).
I ran into a few hiccups (some duplicates with Bertrand's) for which I
opened the following issues:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/207
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/208
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/209 (bug)
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/210
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/211 (bug)
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/212
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/213 (bug,
blocks deployment)
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/214
Carlos I'm not sure how you deployed successfully and ran hello world. I'd
like to know if this is isolated to me. It looks like both Betrand and I
ran into issues with deployment (beyond the doc bug).
-r
Re: No test code in the release? (was: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk
0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module)
Posted by Vincent S Hou <sh...@us.ibm.com>.
Hi Bertrand,
The reason we do not ship the tests in the artifact for this release is that there are test files with unidentified licenses, which may bring risks in when we distribute them.
After we resolve the license issues, we will package them in the source code artifact.
Best wishes.
Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM Cloud
Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: shou@us.ibm.com,
Phone: +1(919)254-7182
Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States
-----Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org> wrote: -----
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
From: Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>
Date: 07/03/2018 04:33AM
Subject: No test code in the release? (was: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module)
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 10:52 PM Vincent S Hou <sh...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> ...I have proposed a PR fixing all the issues raised in this mail thread: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/pull/218 ...
I noticed the "Since this release does not ship the code of test
cases.." comment there.
What's the plan for these test cases, are they part of a separate module?
If yes, I think future releases of these modules should be synced, so
that people know which set of tests to use against a version of the
core release.
This is not an urgent problem, I'm just trying to understand the idea.
-Bertrand
No test code in the release? (was: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk
0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module)
Posted by Bertrand Delacretaz <bd...@apache.org>.
Hi,
On Mon, Jul 2, 2018 at 10:52 PM Vincent S Hou <sh...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> ...I have proposed a PR fixing all the issues raised in this mail thread: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/pull/218 ...
I noticed the "Since this release does not ship the code of test
cases.." comment there.
What's the plan for these test cases, are they part of a separate module?
If yes, I think future releases of these modules should be synced, so
that people know which set of tests to use against a version of the
core release.
This is not an urgent problem, I'm just trying to understand the idea.
-Bertrand
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk
module
Posted by Vincent S Hou <sh...@us.ibm.com>.
I have proposed a PR fixing all the issues raised in this mail thread: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/pull/218
Welcome to review it.
When this PR is merged, we will have the artifact generated for rc2.
Best wishes.
Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM Cloud
Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: shou@us.ibm.com,
Phone: +1(919)254-7182
Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States
-----Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com> wrote: -----
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
From: Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com>
Date: 07/01/2018 10:21PM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module
Thank you Vincent this is what having RCs process in place is for, no problem or issues on having multiple candidates as we move forward we will do less RCs in future releases as everything settles.
- Carlos Santana
@csantanapr
> On Jul 1, 2018, at 9:45 PM, Vincent S Hou <sh...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> I have replied to the mail thread [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module, regarding my plan.
>
> I will open another mail thread to vote openwhisk rc2, after I fix the issues based on people's comments. OpenWhisk is currently ready to pick up a new commit.
> I still need to work on the issues for documentation: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues
>
> Stay tuned.
>
> Thank you for the votes.
>
>
>
> Best wishes.
> Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
>
> Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM Cloud
>
> Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: shou@us.ibm.com,
> Phone: +1(919)254-7182
> Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States
>
> -----Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com> wrote: -----
> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> From: Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com>
> Date: 06/30/2018 08:05AM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module
>
> Sorry Rodric my second part of my email was intended for Vincent
>
> Vincent you want to do an RC2 and address or continue since you are release
> manager I don’t want to impose anything on you.
>
> But if you want to continue I think you have enough votes to close it and
> move forward with IPMC.
>> On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 5:44 AM Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I figured out the issue - posted it as a comment on GitHub.
>>
>> -r
>>
>>> On Jun 30, 2018, at 1:40 AM, Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Rodric
>>> I ran it on my mac and think I made sure I unset my OPENWHISK_HOME.
>>>
>>> I can try again with a clean OS using a fresh Vagrant Ubuntu14 and using
>>> the tgz and give it a go,
>>>
>>> Are you sure is not easier to do an RC2 and fix this issues in the
>> artifact?
>>>
>>> If you want to proceed, then go ahead and close the vote result in dev
>> and
>>> start the new vote on in incubator list to see what would be the vote
>>> results, but take into account you will need to be on top of the findings
>>> which would be similar as the found in the dev list.
>>>
>>> -- Carlos
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 2:19 PM Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> -r
>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 29, 2018, at 11:28 AM, Vincent S Hou <sh...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Rodric,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think all the issues can be resolved by updating the instruction of
>>>> installation.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can definitely work on that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Our vote for main OpenWhisk module is effective. After consolidating
>> the
>>>> result and fixing the document, we should proceed with the release.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have tried the local deployment, which turned out to be fine. I have
>>>> documented some known issues in the instruction.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best wishes.
>>>>> Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
>>>>>
>>>>> Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM
>>>> Cloud
>>>>>
>>>>> Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: shou@us.ibm.com,
>>>>> Phone: +1(919)254-7182 <(919)%20254-7182>
>>>>> Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United
>>>> States
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com> wrote: -----
>>>>> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
>>>>> From: Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: 06/29/2018 08:38AM
>>>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main
>>>> OpenWhisk module
>>>>>
>>>>> I am breaking this out into a DISCUSS thread so not to pollute the
>> vote.
>>>> In
>>>>> completing this checking list:
>>>>>
>>>>> [x] Download links are valid.
>>>>> [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
>>>>> [x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
>>>> release.
>>>>> [x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo.
>>>>> [x] All files have license headers if necessary. (checked with
>> scan-code)
>>>>> [x] No compiled archives bundled in source archive (modulo
>>>>> gradle-wrapper.jar).
>>>>>
>>>>> I ran into a few hiccups (some duplicates with Bertrand's) for which I
>>>>> opened the following issues:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/207
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/208
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/209 (bug)
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/210
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/211 (bug)
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/212
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/213 (bug,
>>>>> blocks deployment)
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/214
>>>>>
>>>>> Carlos I'm not sure how you deployed successfully and ran hello world.
>>>> I'd
>>>>> like to know if this is isolated to me. It looks like both Betrand and
>> I
>>>>> ran into issues with deployment (beyond the doc bug).
>>>>>
>>>>> -r
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module
Posted by Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com>.
Thank you Vincent this is what having RCs process in place is for, no problem or issues on having multiple candidates as we move forward we will do less RCs in future releases as everything settles.
- Carlos Santana
@csantanapr
> On Jul 1, 2018, at 9:45 PM, Vincent S Hou <sh...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> I have replied to the mail thread [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module, regarding my plan.
>
> I will open another mail thread to vote openwhisk rc2, after I fix the issues based on people's comments. OpenWhisk is currently ready to pick up a new commit.
> I still need to work on the issues for documentation: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues
>
> Stay tuned.
>
> Thank you for the votes.
>
>
>
> Best wishes.
> Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
>
> Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM Cloud
>
> Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: shou@us.ibm.com,
> Phone: +1(919)254-7182
> Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States
>
> -----Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com> wrote: -----
> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> From: Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com>
> Date: 06/30/2018 08:05AM
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module
>
> Sorry Rodric my second part of my email was intended for Vincent
>
> Vincent you want to do an RC2 and address or continue since you are release
> manager I don’t want to impose anything on you.
>
> But if you want to continue I think you have enough votes to close it and
> move forward with IPMC.
>> On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 5:44 AM Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I figured out the issue - posted it as a comment on GitHub.
>>
>> -r
>>
>>> On Jun 30, 2018, at 1:40 AM, Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Rodric
>>> I ran it on my mac and think I made sure I unset my OPENWHISK_HOME.
>>>
>>> I can try again with a clean OS using a fresh Vagrant Ubuntu14 and using
>>> the tgz and give it a go,
>>>
>>> Are you sure is not easier to do an RC2 and fix this issues in the
>> artifact?
>>>
>>> If you want to proceed, then go ahead and close the vote result in dev
>> and
>>> start the new vote on in incubator list to see what would be the vote
>>> results, but take into account you will need to be on top of the findings
>>> which would be similar as the found in the dev list.
>>>
>>> -- Carlos
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 2:19 PM Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Thanks.
>>>>
>>>> -r
>>>>
>>>>> On Jun 29, 2018, at 11:28 AM, Vincent S Hou <sh...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi Rodric,
>>>>>
>>>>> I think all the issues can be resolved by updating the instruction of
>>>> installation.
>>>>>
>>>>> I can definitely work on that.
>>>>>
>>>>> Our vote for main OpenWhisk module is effective. After consolidating
>> the
>>>> result and fixing the document, we should proceed with the release.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have tried the local deployment, which turned out to be fine. I have
>>>> documented some known issues in the instruction.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Best wishes.
>>>>> Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
>>>>>
>>>>> Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM
>>>> Cloud
>>>>>
>>>>> Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: shou@us.ibm.com,
>>>>> Phone: +1(919)254-7182 <(919)%20254-7182>
>>>>> Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United
>>>> States
>>>>>
>>>>> -----Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com> wrote: -----
>>>>> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
>>>>> From: Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: 06/29/2018 08:38AM
>>>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main
>>>> OpenWhisk module
>>>>>
>>>>> I am breaking this out into a DISCUSS thread so not to pollute the
>> vote.
>>>> In
>>>>> completing this checking list:
>>>>>
>>>>> [x] Download links are valid.
>>>>> [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
>>>>> [x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
>>>> release.
>>>>> [x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo.
>>>>> [x] All files have license headers if necessary. (checked with
>> scan-code)
>>>>> [x] No compiled archives bundled in source archive (modulo
>>>>> gradle-wrapper.jar).
>>>>>
>>>>> I ran into a few hiccups (some duplicates with Bertrand's) for which I
>>>>> opened the following issues:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/207
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/208
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/209 (bug)
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/210
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/211 (bug)
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/212
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/213 (bug,
>>>>> blocks deployment)
>>>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/214
>>>>>
>>>>> Carlos I'm not sure how you deployed successfully and ran hello world.
>>>> I'd
>>>>> like to know if this is isolated to me. It looks like both Betrand and
>> I
>>>>> ran into issues with deployment (beyond the doc bug).
>>>>>
>>>>> -r
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk
module
Posted by Vincent S Hou <sh...@us.ibm.com>.
I have replied to the mail thread [VOTE] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module, regarding my plan.
I will open another mail thread to vote openwhisk rc2, after I fix the issues based on people's comments. OpenWhisk is currently ready to pick up a new commit.
I still need to work on the issues for documentation: https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues
Stay tuned.
Thank you for the votes.
Best wishes.
Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM Cloud
Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: shou@us.ibm.com,
Phone: +1(919)254-7182
Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States
-----Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com> wrote: -----
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
From: Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com>
Date: 06/30/2018 08:05AM
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module
Sorry Rodric my second part of my email was intended for Vincent
Vincent you want to do an RC2 and address or continue since you are release
manager I don’t want to impose anything on you.
But if you want to continue I think you have enough votes to close it and
move forward with IPMC.
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 5:44 AM Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I figured out the issue - posted it as a comment on GitHub.
>
> -r
>
> > On Jun 30, 2018, at 1:40 AM, Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Rodric
> > I ran it on my mac and think I made sure I unset my OPENWHISK_HOME.
> >
> > I can try again with a clean OS using a fresh Vagrant Ubuntu14 and using
> > the tgz and give it a go,
> >
> > Are you sure is not easier to do an RC2 and fix this issues in the
> artifact?
> >
> > If you want to proceed, then go ahead and close the vote result in dev
> and
> > start the new vote on in incubator list to see what would be the vote
> > results, but take into account you will need to be on top of the findings
> > which would be similar as the found in the dev list.
> >
> > -- Carlos
> >
> >> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 2:19 PM Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> -r
> >>
> >>> On Jun 29, 2018, at 11:28 AM, Vincent S Hou <sh...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Rodric,
> >>>
> >>> I think all the issues can be resolved by updating the instruction of
> >> installation.
> >>>
> >>> I can definitely work on that.
> >>>
> >>> Our vote for main OpenWhisk module is effective. After consolidating
> the
> >> result and fixing the document, we should proceed with the release.
> >>>
> >>> I have tried the local deployment, which turned out to be fine. I have
> >> documented some known issues in the instruction.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Best wishes.
> >>> Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
> >>>
> >>> Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM
> >> Cloud
> >>>
> >>> Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: shou@us.ibm.com,
> >>> Phone: +1(919)254-7182 <(919)%20254-7182>
> >>> Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United
> >> States
> >>>
> >>> -----Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com> wrote: -----
> >>> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> >>> From: Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com>
> >>> Date: 06/29/2018 08:38AM
> >>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main
> >> OpenWhisk module
> >>>
> >>> I am breaking this out into a DISCUSS thread so not to pollute the
> vote.
> >> In
> >>> completing this checking list:
> >>>
> >>> [x] Download links are valid.
> >>> [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> >>> [x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> >> release.
> >>> [x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo.
> >>> [x] All files have license headers if necessary. (checked with
> scan-code)
> >>> [x] No compiled archives bundled in source archive (modulo
> >>> gradle-wrapper.jar).
> >>>
> >>> I ran into a few hiccups (some duplicates with Bertrand's) for which I
> >>> opened the following issues:
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/207
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/208
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/209 (bug)
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/210
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/211 (bug)
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/212
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/213 (bug,
> >>> blocks deployment)
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/214
> >>>
> >>> Carlos I'm not sure how you deployed successfully and ran hello world.
> >> I'd
> >>> like to know if this is isolated to me. It looks like both Betrand and
> I
> >>> ran into issues with deployment (beyond the doc bug).
> >>>
> >>> -r
> >>>
> >>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main
OpenWhisk module
Posted by Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com>.
Sorry Rodric my second part of my email was intended for Vincent
Vincent you want to do an RC2 and address or continue since you are release
manager I don’t want to impose anything on you.
But if you want to continue I think you have enough votes to close it and
move forward with IPMC.
On Sat, Jun 30, 2018 at 5:44 AM Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I figured out the issue - posted it as a comment on GitHub.
>
> -r
>
> > On Jun 30, 2018, at 1:40 AM, Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Rodric
> > I ran it on my mac and think I made sure I unset my OPENWHISK_HOME.
> >
> > I can try again with a clean OS using a fresh Vagrant Ubuntu14 and using
> > the tgz and give it a go,
> >
> > Are you sure is not easier to do an RC2 and fix this issues in the
> artifact?
> >
> > If you want to proceed, then go ahead and close the vote result in dev
> and
> > start the new vote on in incubator list to see what would be the vote
> > results, but take into account you will need to be on top of the findings
> > which would be similar as the found in the dev list.
> >
> > -- Carlos
> >
> >> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 2:19 PM Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> -r
> >>
> >>> On Jun 29, 2018, at 11:28 AM, Vincent S Hou <sh...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Rodric,
> >>>
> >>> I think all the issues can be resolved by updating the instruction of
> >> installation.
> >>>
> >>> I can definitely work on that.
> >>>
> >>> Our vote for main OpenWhisk module is effective. After consolidating
> the
> >> result and fixing the document, we should proceed with the release.
> >>>
> >>> I have tried the local deployment, which turned out to be fine. I have
> >> documented some known issues in the instruction.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Best wishes.
> >>> Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
> >>>
> >>> Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM
> >> Cloud
> >>>
> >>> Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: shou@us.ibm.com,
> >>> Phone: +1(919)254-7182 <(919)%20254-7182>
> >>> Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United
> >> States
> >>>
> >>> -----Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com> wrote: -----
> >>> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> >>> From: Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com>
> >>> Date: 06/29/2018 08:38AM
> >>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main
> >> OpenWhisk module
> >>>
> >>> I am breaking this out into a DISCUSS thread so not to pollute the
> vote.
> >> In
> >>> completing this checking list:
> >>>
> >>> [x] Download links are valid.
> >>> [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> >>> [x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> >> release.
> >>> [x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo.
> >>> [x] All files have license headers if necessary. (checked with
> scan-code)
> >>> [x] No compiled archives bundled in source archive (modulo
> >>> gradle-wrapper.jar).
> >>>
> >>> I ran into a few hiccups (some duplicates with Bertrand's) for which I
> >>> opened the following issues:
> >>>
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/207
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/208
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/209 (bug)
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/210
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/211 (bug)
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/212
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/213 (bug,
> >>> blocks deployment)
> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/214
> >>>
> >>> Carlos I'm not sure how you deployed successfully and ran hello world.
> >> I'd
> >>> like to know if this is isolated to me. It looks like both Betrand and
> I
> >>> ran into issues with deployment (beyond the doc bug).
> >>>
> >>> -r
> >>>
> >>
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module
Posted by Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com>.
I figured out the issue - posted it as a comment on GitHub.
-r
> On Jun 30, 2018, at 1:40 AM, Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Rodric
> I ran it on my mac and think I made sure I unset my OPENWHISK_HOME.
>
> I can try again with a clean OS using a fresh Vagrant Ubuntu14 and using
> the tgz and give it a go,
>
> Are you sure is not easier to do an RC2 and fix this issues in the artifact?
>
> If you want to proceed, then go ahead and close the vote result in dev and
> start the new vote on in incubator list to see what would be the vote
> results, but take into account you will need to be on top of the findings
> which would be similar as the found in the dev list.
>
> -- Carlos
>
>> On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 2:19 PM Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> -r
>>
>>> On Jun 29, 2018, at 11:28 AM, Vincent S Hou <sh...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Rodric,
>>>
>>> I think all the issues can be resolved by updating the instruction of
>> installation.
>>>
>>> I can definitely work on that.
>>>
>>> Our vote for main OpenWhisk module is effective. After consolidating the
>> result and fixing the document, we should proceed with the release.
>>>
>>> I have tried the local deployment, which turned out to be fine. I have
>> documented some known issues in the instruction.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Best wishes.
>>> Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
>>>
>>> Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM
>> Cloud
>>>
>>> Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: shou@us.ibm.com,
>>> Phone: +1(919)254-7182 <(919)%20254-7182>
>>> Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United
>> States
>>>
>>> -----Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com> wrote: -----
>>> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
>>> From: Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com>
>>> Date: 06/29/2018 08:38AM
>>> Subject: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main
>> OpenWhisk module
>>>
>>> I am breaking this out into a DISCUSS thread so not to pollute the vote.
>> In
>>> completing this checking list:
>>>
>>> [x] Download links are valid.
>>> [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
>>> [x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
>> release.
>>> [x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo.
>>> [x] All files have license headers if necessary. (checked with scan-code)
>>> [x] No compiled archives bundled in source archive (modulo
>>> gradle-wrapper.jar).
>>>
>>> I ran into a few hiccups (some duplicates with Bertrand's) for which I
>>> opened the following issues:
>>>
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/207
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/208
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/209 (bug)
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/210
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/211 (bug)
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/212
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/213 (bug,
>>> blocks deployment)
>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/214
>>>
>>> Carlos I'm not sure how you deployed successfully and ran hello world.
>> I'd
>>> like to know if this is isolated to me. It looks like both Betrand and I
>>> ran into issues with deployment (beyond the doc bug).
>>>
>>> -r
>>>
>>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main
OpenWhisk module
Posted by Carlos Santana <cs...@gmail.com>.
Rodric
I ran it on my mac and think I made sure I unset my OPENWHISK_HOME.
I can try again with a clean OS using a fresh Vagrant Ubuntu14 and using
the tgz and give it a go,
Are you sure is not easier to do an RC2 and fix this issues in the artifact?
If you want to proceed, then go ahead and close the vote result in dev and
start the new vote on in incubator list to see what would be the vote
results, but take into account you will need to be on top of the findings
which would be similar as the found in the dev list.
-- Carlos
On Fri, Jun 29, 2018 at 2:19 PM Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks.
>
> -r
>
> > On Jun 29, 2018, at 11:28 AM, Vincent S Hou <sh...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Rodric,
> >
> > I think all the issues can be resolved by updating the instruction of
> installation.
> >
> > I can definitely work on that.
> >
> > Our vote for main OpenWhisk module is effective. After consolidating the
> result and fixing the document, we should proceed with the release.
> >
> > I have tried the local deployment, which turned out to be fine. I have
> documented some known issues in the instruction.
> >
> >
> >
> > Best wishes.
> > Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
> >
> > Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM
> Cloud
> >
> > Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: shou@us.ibm.com,
> > Phone: +1(919)254-7182 <(919)%20254-7182>
> > Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United
> States
> >
> > -----Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com> wrote: -----
> > To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> > From: Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com>
> > Date: 06/29/2018 08:38AM
> > Subject: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main
> OpenWhisk module
> >
> > I am breaking this out into a DISCUSS thread so not to pollute the vote.
> In
> > completing this checking list:
> >
> > [x] Download links are valid.
> > [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> > [x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current
> release.
> > [x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo.
> > [x] All files have license headers if necessary. (checked with scan-code)
> > [x] No compiled archives bundled in source archive (modulo
> > gradle-wrapper.jar).
> >
> > I ran into a few hiccups (some duplicates with Bertrand's) for which I
> > opened the following issues:
> >
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/207
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/208
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/209 (bug)
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/210
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/211 (bug)
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/212
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/213 (bug,
> > blocks deployment)
> > https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/214
> >
> > Carlos I'm not sure how you deployed successfully and ran hello world.
> I'd
> > like to know if this is isolated to me. It looks like both Betrand and I
> > ran into issues with deployment (beyond the doc bug).
> >
> > -r
> >
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module
Posted by Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com>.
Thanks.
-r
> On Jun 29, 2018, at 11:28 AM, Vincent S Hou <sh...@us.ibm.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Rodric,
>
> I think all the issues can be resolved by updating the instruction of installation.
>
> I can definitely work on that.
>
> Our vote for main OpenWhisk module is effective. After consolidating the result and fixing the document, we should proceed with the release.
>
> I have tried the local deployment, which turned out to be fine. I have documented some known issues in the instruction.
>
>
>
> Best wishes.
> Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
>
> Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM Cloud
>
> Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: shou@us.ibm.com,
> Phone: +1(919)254-7182
> Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States
>
> -----Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com> wrote: -----
> To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
> From: Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com>
> Date: 06/29/2018 08:38AM
> Subject: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module
>
> I am breaking this out into a DISCUSS thread so not to pollute the vote. In
> completing this checking list:
>
> [x] Download links are valid.
> [x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
> [x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
> [x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo.
> [x] All files have license headers if necessary. (checked with scan-code)
> [x] No compiled archives bundled in source archive (modulo
> gradle-wrapper.jar).
>
> I ran into a few hiccups (some duplicates with Bertrand's) for which I
> opened the following issues:
>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/207
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/208
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/209 (bug)
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/210
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/211 (bug)
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/212
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/213 (bug,
> blocks deployment)
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/214
>
> Carlos I'm not sure how you deployed successfully and ran hello world. I'd
> like to know if this is isolated to me. It looks like both Betrand and I
> ran into issues with deployment (beyond the doc bug).
>
> -r
>
Re: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk
module
Posted by Vincent S Hou <sh...@us.ibm.com>.
Hi Rodric,
I think all the issues can be resolved by updating the instruction of installation.
I can definitely work on that.
Our vote for main OpenWhisk module is effective. After consolidating the result and fixing the document, we should proceed with the release.
I have tried the local deployment, which turned out to be fine. I have documented some known issues in the instruction.
Best wishes.
Vincent Hou (侯胜博)
Advisory Software Engineer, OpenWhisk Contributor, Open Technology, IBM Cloud
Notes ID: Vincent S Hou/Raleigh/IBM, E-mail: shou@us.ibm.com,
Phone: +1(919)254-7182
Address: 4205 S Miami Blvd (Cornwallis Drive), Durham, NC 27703, United States
-----Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com> wrote: -----
To: dev@openwhisk.apache.org
From: Rodric Rabbah <ro...@gmail.com>
Date: 06/29/2018 08:38AM
Subject: [DISCUSS] Release Apache OpenWhisk 0.9.0-incubating: main OpenWhisk module
I am breaking this out into a DISCUSS thread so not to pollute the vote. In
completing this checking list:
[x] Download links are valid.
[x] Checksums and PGP signatures are valid.
[x] Source code artifacts have correct names matching the current release.
[x] LICENSE and NOTICE files are correct for each OpenWhisk repo.
[x] All files have license headers if necessary. (checked with scan-code)
[x] No compiled archives bundled in source archive (modulo
gradle-wrapper.jar).
I ran into a few hiccups (some duplicates with Bertrand's) for which I
opened the following issues:
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/207
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/208
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/209 (bug)
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/210
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/211 (bug)
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/212
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/213 (bug,
blocks deployment)
https://github.com/apache/incubator-openwhisk-release/issues/214
Carlos I'm not sure how you deployed successfully and ran hello world. I'd
like to know if this is isolated to me. It looks like both Betrand and I
ran into issues with deployment (beyond the doc bug).
-r