You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openmeetings.apache.org by Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com> on 2012/04/11 16:19:16 UTC
Invitation hash does not work with tunnelling
Hello Timur,
It seems invitations like following does not work when coupled with
tunnelling. Could you add few words how do you install tunnelling on
servers, and possibly fix the bug?
--
With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
http://dataved.ru/
+7 916 562 8095
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Alexei Fedotov
<al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Dmitry, folks
>
> Please use
> http://demo.dataved.ru/openmeetings/?invitationHash=bd6eb284e48c6e77326fc9c49bdd0a3c
>
> This server uses port 80, I can access only this one from this office
>
> --
> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> http://dataved.ru/
> +7 916 562 8095
>
>
>
> 2012/4/11 Dmitry Zamula <cl...@gmail.com>:
>> Yes, of course
>>
>> 2012/4/11 Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>
>>
>>> > 16:30
>>>
>>> Can we move the interview to 17:30?
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
>>> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
>>> http://dataved.ru/
>>> +7 916 562 8095
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2012/4/10 Dmitry Zamula <cl...@gmail.com>:
>>> > I would like to interview tomorrow (4/11/2012) at 16-30 (UTC + 04:00).
>>> >
>>> > 2012/4/10 Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>
>>> >
>>> >> German,
>>> >> It's good you have asked.
>>> >>
>>> >> We have to estimate coding skills of each participant, not only
>>> >> proposal writing skills. You already have several patches, others
>>> >> don't. Still it should not stop you from showing your dedication to
>>> >> GSoC by preparing a patch which advances your project.
>>> >>
>>> >> In other words, do the first step of your project now. And never say
>>> >> "we don't have time for that" on public lists. :-)
>>> >>
>>> >> Why we ask to do that? There exist brilliant proposal writers, who
>>> >> cannot code. That actually leads to GSoC failure, because Google is
>>> >> very specific on the following matter: just fixing documentation is
>>> >> not enough. That's why we ask to demonstrate coding skills.
>>> >>
>>> >> Ankur, Dmitry,
>>> >> In addition to patches we need to set up openmeetings interviews with
>>> >> both of you. Please specify time which is suitable for you.
>>> >>
>>> >> --
>>> >> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
>>> >> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
>>> >> http://dataved.ru/
>>> >> +7 916 562 8095
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> 2012/4/10 German Grekhov <ge...@gmail.com>:
>>> >> > Alexei,
>>> >> > I don't understand. What does it mean?
>>> >> > What patches are you talking about?
>>> >> >
>>> >> > German.
>>> >> >
>>> >> [...]
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > _________________________________________________________
>>> >
>>> > С уважением,
>>> >
>>> > Замула Дмитрий
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> _________________________________________________________
>>
>> С уважением,
>>
>> Замула Дмитрий
Re: Invitation hash does not work with tunnelling
Posted by Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>.
yes
2012/4/11 seba.wagner@gmail.com <se...@gmail.com>:
> Tunneling or not makes no difference for invitation hash.
> You have an error in your system configuration if the link does not work.
>
> Sebastian
>
> 2012/4/11 Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>
>
>> Hello Timur,
>>
>> It seems invitations like following does not work when coupled with
>> tunnelling. Could you add few words how do you install tunnelling on
>> servers, and possibly fix the bug?
>>
>>
>> --
>> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
>> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
>> http://dataved.ru/
>> +7 916 562 8095
>>
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Alexei Fedotov
>> <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Dmitry, folks
>> >
>> > Please use
>> >
>> http://demo.dataved.ru/openmeetings/?invitationHash=bd6eb284e48c6e77326fc9c49bdd0a3c
>> >
>> > This server uses port 80, I can access only this one from this office
>> >
>> > --
>> > With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
>> > Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
>> > http://dataved.ru/
>> > +7 916 562 8095
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > 2012/4/11 Dmitry Zamula <cl...@gmail.com>:
>> >> Yes, of course
>> >>
>> >> 2012/4/11 Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>
>> >>
>> >>> > 16:30
>> >>>
>> >>> Can we move the interview to 17:30?
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
>> >>> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
>> >>> http://dataved.ru/
>> >>> +7 916 562 8095
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> 2012/4/10 Dmitry Zamula <cl...@gmail.com>:
>> >>> > I would like to interview tomorrow (4/11/2012) at 16-30 (UTC +
>> 04:00).
>> >>> >
>> >>> > 2012/4/10 Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >> German,
>> >>> >> It's good you have asked.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> We have to estimate coding skills of each participant, not only
>> >>> >> proposal writing skills. You already have several patches, others
>> >>> >> don't. Still it should not stop you from showing your dedication to
>> >>> >> GSoC by preparing a patch which advances your project.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> In other words, do the first step of your project now. And never say
>> >>> >> "we don't have time for that" on public lists. :-)
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Why we ask to do that? There exist brilliant proposal writers, who
>> >>> >> cannot code. That actually leads to GSoC failure, because Google is
>> >>> >> very specific on the following matter: just fixing documentation is
>> >>> >> not enough. That's why we ask to demonstrate coding skills.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> Ankur, Dmitry,
>> >>> >> In addition to patches we need to set up openmeetings interviews
>> with
>> >>> >> both of you. Please specify time which is suitable for you.
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> --
>> >>> >> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
>> >>> >> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
>> >>> >> http://dataved.ru/
>> >>> >> +7 916 562 8095
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >> 2012/4/10 German Grekhov <ge...@gmail.com>:
>> >>> >> > Alexei,
>> >>> >> > I don't understand. What does it mean?
>> >>> >> > What patches are you talking about?
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> > German.
>> >>> >> >
>> >>> >> [...]
>> >>> >>
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> >
>> >>> > --
>> >>> > _________________________________________________________
>> >>> >
>> >>> > С уважением,
>> >>> >
>> >>> > Замула Дмитрий
>> >>>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> _________________________________________________________
>> >>
>> >> С уважением,
>> >>
>> >> Замула Дмитрий
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Sebastian Wagner
> https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
> http://www.openmeetings.de
> http://www.webbase-design.de
> http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
> seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: Invitation hash does not work with tunnelling
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
Tunneling or not makes no difference for invitation hash.
You have an error in your system configuration if the link does not work.
Sebastian
2012/4/11 Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>
> Hello Timur,
>
> It seems invitations like following does not work when coupled with
> tunnelling. Could you add few words how do you install tunnelling on
> servers, and possibly fix the bug?
>
>
> --
> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> http://dataved.ru/
> +7 916 562 8095
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Alexei Fedotov
> <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Dmitry, folks
> >
> > Please use
> >
> http://demo.dataved.ru/openmeetings/?invitationHash=bd6eb284e48c6e77326fc9c49bdd0a3c
> >
> > This server uses port 80, I can access only this one from this office
> >
> > --
> > With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> > Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> > http://dataved.ru/
> > +7 916 562 8095
> >
> >
> >
> > 2012/4/11 Dmitry Zamula <cl...@gmail.com>:
> >> Yes, of course
> >>
> >> 2012/4/11 Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>
> >>
> >>> > 16:30
> >>>
> >>> Can we move the interview to 17:30?
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> >>> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> >>> http://dataved.ru/
> >>> +7 916 562 8095
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> 2012/4/10 Dmitry Zamula <cl...@gmail.com>:
> >>> > I would like to interview tomorrow (4/11/2012) at 16-30 (UTC +
> 04:00).
> >>> >
> >>> > 2012/4/10 Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>
> >>> >
> >>> >> German,
> >>> >> It's good you have asked.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> We have to estimate coding skills of each participant, not only
> >>> >> proposal writing skills. You already have several patches, others
> >>> >> don't. Still it should not stop you from showing your dedication to
> >>> >> GSoC by preparing a patch which advances your project.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> In other words, do the first step of your project now. And never say
> >>> >> "we don't have time for that" on public lists. :-)
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Why we ask to do that? There exist brilliant proposal writers, who
> >>> >> cannot code. That actually leads to GSoC failure, because Google is
> >>> >> very specific on the following matter: just fixing documentation is
> >>> >> not enough. That's why we ask to demonstrate coding skills.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> Ankur, Dmitry,
> >>> >> In addition to patches we need to set up openmeetings interviews
> with
> >>> >> both of you. Please specify time which is suitable for you.
> >>> >>
> >>> >> --
> >>> >> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> >>> >> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> >>> >> http://dataved.ru/
> >>> >> +7 916 562 8095
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >>
> >>> >> 2012/4/10 German Grekhov <ge...@gmail.com>:
> >>> >> > Alexei,
> >>> >> > I don't understand. What does it mean?
> >>> >> > What patches are you talking about?
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> > German.
> >>> >> >
> >>> >> [...]
> >>> >>
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> >
> >>> > --
> >>> > _________________________________________________________
> >>> >
> >>> > С уважением,
> >>> >
> >>> > Замула Дмитрий
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> --
> >> _________________________________________________________
> >>
> >> С уважением,
> >>
> >> Замула Дмитрий
>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.openmeetings.de
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: Invitation hash does not work with tunnelling
Posted by "seba.wagner@gmail.com" <se...@gmail.com>.
Hi Sascha,
can you evaluate what settings you've been using with mod_proxy so far and
share with us?
Thanks!
Sebastian
2012/4/11 Timur Tleukenov <ti...@unipro.ru>
> **
> Hello Alexei,
>
> For HTTP tunneling required two things:
> 1) Configure http proxy, for example, apache2 httpd.conf should looks like
> this:
> *<VirtualHost *:80>
> ProxyRequests Off
> ProxyPreserveHost On
>
> <Proxy *>
> Order deny,allow
> Allow from all
> </Proxy>
>
> ProxyPass /openmeetings http://localhost:5080/openmeetings
> ProxyPassReverse /openmeetings/ http://localhost:5080/openmeetings/
>
> ProxyPass / http://localhost:8088/
> ProxyPassReverse / http://localhost:8088/
>
> <Location /openmeetings/>
> Order allow,deny
> Allow from all
> </Location>
>
> </VirtualHost>*
>
> 2) Change rtmpTunnelport and red5httpport values in
> webapps/openmeetings/config.xml:
> *<rtmpTunnelport>80</rtmpTunnelport>
> <red5httpport>80</red5httpport>nano *
>
> But I have no idea how it can interact with invitations.
>
> Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com> писал(а) в своём письме Wed, 11
> Apr 2012 21:19:16 +0700:
>
>
> > Hello Timur,
> >
> > It seems invitations like following does not work when coupled with
> > tunnelling. Could you add few words how do you install tunnelling on
> > servers, and possibly fix the bug?
> >
> >
> > --
> > With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> > Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> > http://dataved.ru/
> > +7 916 562 8095
> >
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Alexei Fedotov
> > <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> Dmitry, folks
> >>
> >> Please use
> >>
> http://demo.dataved.ru/openmeetings/?invitationHash=bd6eb284e48c6e77326fc9c49bdd0a3c
> >>
> >> This server uses port 80, I can access only this one from this office
> >>
> >> --
> >> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> >> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> >> http://dataved.ru/
> >> +7 916 562 8095
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> 2012/4/11 Dmitry Zamula <cl...@gmail.com>:
> >>> Yes, of course
> >>>
> >>> 2012/4/11 Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>
> >>>
> >>>> > 16:30
> >>>>
> >>>> Can we move the interview to 17:30?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> --
> >>>> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> >>>> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> >>>> http://dataved.ru/
> >>>> +7 916 562 8095
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2012/4/10 Dmitry Zamula <cl...@gmail.com>:
> >>>> > I would like to interview tomorrow (4/11/2012) at 16-30 (UTC +
> >>>> 04:00).
> >>>> >
> >>>> > 2012/4/10 Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>
> >>>> >
> >>>> >> German,
> >>>> >> It's good you have asked.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> We have to estimate coding skills of each participant, not only
> >>>> >> proposal writing skills. You already have several patches, others
> >>>> >> don't. Still it should not stop you from showing your dedication to
> >>>> >> GSoC by preparing a patch which advances your project.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> In other words, do the first step of your project now. And never
> >>>> say
> >>>> >> "we don't have time for that" on public lists. :-)
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Why we ask to do that? There exist brilliant proposal writers, who
> >>>> >> cannot code. That actually leads to GSoC failure, because Google is
> >>>> >> very specific on the following matter: just fixing documentation is
> >>>> >> not enough. That's why we ask to demonstrate coding skills.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Ankur, Dmitry,
> >>>> >> In addition to patches we need to set up openmeetings interviews
> >>>> with
> >>>> >> both of you. Please specify time which is suitable for you.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> --
> >>>> >> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> >>>> >> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> >>>> >> http://dataved.ru/
> >>>> >> +7 916 562 8095
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> 2012/4/10 German Grekhov <ge...@gmail.com>:
> >>>> >> > Alexei,
> >>>> >> > I don't understand. What does it mean?
> >>>> >> > What patches are you talking about?
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> > German.
> >>>> >> >
> >>>> >> [...]
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> > --
> >>>> > _________________________________________________________
> >>>> >
> >>>> > С уважением,
> >>>> >
> >>>> > Замула Дмитрий
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> _________________________________________________________
> >>>
> >>> С уважением,
> >>>
> >>> Замула Дмитрий
>
>
> --
> Best regars,
> Timur Tleukenov
>
--
Sebastian Wagner
https://twitter.com/#!/dead_lock
http://www.openmeetings.de
http://www.webbase-design.de
http://www.wagner-sebastian.com
seba.wagner@gmail.com
Re: Invitation hash does not work with tunnelling
Posted by Timur Tleukenov <ti...@unipro.ru>.
Hello Alexei,
For HTTP tunneling required two things:
1) Configure http proxy, for example, apache2 httpd.conf should looks like
this:
<VirtualHost *:80>
ProxyRequests Off
ProxyPreserveHost On
<Proxy *>
Order deny,allow
Allow from all
</Proxy>
ProxyPass /openmeetings http://localhost:5080/openmeetings
ProxyPassReverse /openmeetings/ http://localhost:5080/openmeetings/
ProxyPass / http://localhost:8088/
ProxyPassReverse / http://localhost:8088/
<Location /openmeetings/>
Order allow,deny
Allow from all
</Location>
</VirtualHost>
2) Change rtmpTunnelport and red5httpport values in
webapps/openmeetings/config.xml:
<rtmpTunnelport>80</rtmpTunnelport>
<red5httpport>80</red5httpport>nano
But I have no idea how it can interact with invitations.
Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com> писал(а) в своём письме Wed, 11
Apr 2012 21:19:16 +0700:
> Hello Timur,
>
> It seems invitations like following does not work when coupled with
> tunnelling. Could you add few words how do you install tunnelling on
> servers, and possibly fix the bug?
>
>
> --
> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
> http://dataved.ru/
> +7 916 562 8095
>
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Alexei Fedotov
> <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Dmitry, folks
>>
>> Please use
>> http://demo.dataved.ru/openmeetings/?invitationHash=bd6eb284e48c6e77326fc9c49bdd0a3c
>>
>> This server uses port 80, I can access only this one from this office
>>
>> --
>> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
>> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
>> http://dataved.ru/
>> +7 916 562 8095
>>
>>
>>
>> 2012/4/11 Dmitry Zamula <cl...@gmail.com>:
>>> Yes, of course
>>>
>>> 2012/4/11 Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> > 16:30
>>>>
>>>> Can we move the interview to 17:30?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
>>>> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
>>>> http://dataved.ru/
>>>> +7 916 562 8095
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2012/4/10 Dmitry Zamula <cl...@gmail.com>:
>>>> > I would like to interview tomorrow (4/11/2012) at 16-30 (UTC +
>>>> 04:00).
>>>> >
>>>> > 2012/4/10 Alexei Fedotov <al...@gmail.com>
>>>> >
>>>> >> German,
>>>> >> It's good you have asked.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> We have to estimate coding skills of each participant, not only
>>>> >> proposal writing skills. You already have several patches, others
>>>> >> don't. Still it should not stop you from showing your dedication to
>>>> >> GSoC by preparing a patch which advances your project.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> In other words, do the first step of your project now. And neversay
>>>> >> "we don't have time for that" on public lists. :-)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Why we ask to do that? There exist brilliant proposal writers, who
>>>> >> cannot code. That actually leads to GSoC failure, because Google is
>>>> >> very specific on the following matter: just fixing documentation is
>>>> >> not enough. That's why we ask to demonstrate coding skills.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Ankur, Dmitry,
>>>> >> In addition to patches we need to set up openmeetings interviews
>>>> with
>>>> >> both of you. Please specify time which is suitable for you.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> --
>>>> >> With best regards / с наилучшими пожеланиями,
>>>> >> Alexei Fedotov / Алексей Федотов,
>>>> >> http://dataved.ru/
>>>> >> +7 916 562 8095
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> 2012/4/10 German Grekhov <ge...@gmail.com>:
>>>> >> > Alexei,
>>>> >> > I don't understand. What does it mean?
>>>> >> > What patches are you talking about?
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> > German.
>>>> >> >
>>>> >> [...]
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > --
>>>> > _________________________________________________________
>>>> >
>>>> > С уважением,
>>>> >
>>>> > Замула Дмитрий
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> _________________________________________________________
>>>
>>> С уважением,
>>>
>>> Замула Дмитрий
--
Best regars,
Timur Tleukenov