SUBJ_ALL_CAPS vs. RE:

[ji...@jidanni.org]

SUBJ_ALL_CAPS to you, but not to me:
Subject: RE: 柯小柯
Can't you give the RE: etc. a break?
And also why is the Chinese considered CAPS?
$ unicode P p 柯|grep Category
Category: Lu (Letter, Uppercase)
Category: Ll (Letter, Lowercase)
Category: Lo (Letter, Other)
Sure I can customize this rule for just me, but I think it should be
fixed for everybody.

Re: SUBJ_ALL_CAPS vs. RE:

[Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de>]

On Fri, 2010-07-02 at 09:25 +0800, jidanni@jidanni.org wrote:
> SUBJ_ALL_CAPS to you, but not to me:
> Subject: RE: 柯小柯
> Can't you give the RE: etc. a break?
> And also why is the Chinese considered CAPS?

Err, dude. Just venting here, I guess, because you got bit by this?

Bug 5859 [1]. In particular, have a close look at your own "me too"
comment 1.

What is the point of this post? You do know it's a bug, you do know it
is on record. That's where this issue should be handled. Constructive
comments and patches welcome. Venting and whining on the users list will
not get you anywhere.

  guenther


[1] https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5859

-- 
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}