3.3.0 plans

[Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org>]

ok, what bugs really need to be fixed for 3.3.0?  feel free to set
Priority on bugs on the 3.3.0 milestone.  in my opinion this is the
only real blocker:

5752    2008-02-04  nor     P1      Let's get rid of the default rules dir
and make sa-update mandatory

All the rest is just icing (and the odd non-blocker bug, but who's
counting ;).

Also, I would also like to get rid of the "rulesrc" external, and instead
just put its contents into each branch, separately.  I don't think the
idea of sharing rules in this way between branches has worked out; in my
opinion it's caused more trouble than help (unanticipated dependencies,
complexity, SVN external = horrible anyway).  Is anyone still attached to
this idea?

--j.

Re: 3.3.0 plans

[Quanah Gibson-Mount <qu...@zimbra.com>]

--On Friday, March 14, 2008 3:36 PM +0000 Justin Mason <jm...@jmason.org> 
wrote:

> ok, what bugs really need to be fixed for 3.3.0?  feel free to set
> Priority on bugs on the 3.3.0 milestone.  in my opinion this is the
> only real blocker:

<http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=4416> please please 
please. :)


--

Quanah Gibson-Mount
Principal Software Engineer
Zimbra, Inc
--------------------
Zimbra ::  the leader in open source messaging and collaboration

Re: 3.3.0 plans

[Warren Togami <wt...@redhat.com>]

Justin Mason wrote:
> ok, what bugs really need to be fixed for 3.3.0?  feel free to set
> Priority on bugs on the 3.3.0 milestone.  in my opinion this is the
> only real blocker:
> 
> 5752    2008-02-04  nor     P1      Let's get rid of the default rules dir
> and make sa-update mandatory
> 
> All the rest is just icing (and the odd non-blocker bug, but who's
> counting ;).

It has been a while since this last update.  What is the status of 3.3.0 
now?

Warren Togami
wtogami@redhat.com