You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to reviews@spark.apache.org by cloud-fan <gi...@git.apache.org> on 2018/06/01 00:43:39 UTC
[GitHub] spark pull request #21470: [SPARK-24443][SQL] comparison should accept struc...
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21470#discussion_r192274662
--- Diff: sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala ---
@@ -803,18 +803,60 @@ object TypeCoercion {
e.copy(left = Cast(e.left, TimestampType))
}
- case b @ BinaryOperator(left, right) if left.dataType != right.dataType =>
- findTightestCommonType(left.dataType, right.dataType).map { commonType =>
- if (b.inputType.acceptsType(commonType)) {
- // If the expression accepts the tightest common type, cast to that.
- val newLeft = if (left.dataType == commonType) left else Cast(left, commonType)
- val newRight = if (right.dataType == commonType) right else Cast(right, commonType)
- b.withNewChildren(Seq(newLeft, newRight))
- } else {
- // Otherwise, don't do anything with the expression.
- b
- }
- }.getOrElse(b) // If there is no applicable conversion, leave expression unchanged.
+ case b @ BinaryOperator(left, right)
+ if !BinaryOperator.sameType(left.dataType, right.dataType) =>
--- End diff --
`findTightestCommonType` doesn't accept struct type with different filed names, so the other code are needed.
---
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscribe@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-help@spark.apache.org