You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to regexp-dev@jakarta.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2001/09/09 00:54:11 UTC

[DO NOT REPLY: Bug 2525] Leading zero-length string splitted by RE

PLEASE DO NOT REPLY TO THIS MESSAGE. TO FURTHER COMMENT
ON THE STATUS OF THIS BUG PLEASE FOLLOW THE LINK BELOW
AND USE THE ON-LINE APPLICATION. REPLYING TO THIS MESSAGE
DOES NOT UPDATE THE DATABASE, AND SO YOUR COMMENT WILL
BE LOST SOMEWHERE.

http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2525

*** shadow/2525	Tue Aug 28 15:34:01 2001
--- shadow/2525.tmp.3251	Sat Sep  8 15:54:11 2001
***************
*** 35,38 ****
  ignored, or removed from the array before the array is returned.  Shouldn't this
  either be consistent, or should split() contain options for splitting on
  concurrent matches to yield empty String elements (so that this condition can be
! managed)? 
--- 35,44 ----
  ignored, or removed from the array before the array is returned.  Shouldn't this
  either be consistent, or should split() contain options for splitting on
  concurrent matches to yield empty String elements (so that this condition can be
! managed)? 
! 
! ------- Additional Comments From gholam@xtra.co.nz  2001-09-08 15:54 -------
! If noone has any objections I will change this bug to INVALID.
! Grahams's seems to show its behaviour is correct.
! 
! Perhaps some notes in the docs?