You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@beehive.apache.org by Eddie ONeil <ek...@gmail.com> on 2005/06/01 02:10:13 UTC
[vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
All--
Continuing on the 1.0m1 release train, we've got rc2 installers that
are now posted here:
http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/beehive/nightlies/1.0m1-rc2/
I'm proposing that we promote these to be released as 1.0rc1. They
are complete and we expect no further changes unless any issues or
BLOCKERs come up during voting.
Same deal as before; voting options are below.
The vote will close in about 72 hours at 00:00 GMT (12 AM) on
Saturday, June 4, 2005.
Thanks!
Eddie
Vote:
[+1] Yes, the release is ready to go from the URL above.
[0] Abstain / not sure.
[-1] No, the release is not ready yet. If you vote this way, please
provide an explanation why and add what could be done to address your
concerns.
RE: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/beehive/nightlies/1.0m1-rc2/
Given that I see:
- notice in directory
- proper naming for distribution files
- notice in files
- community agreed to deliver a milestone
+1 from me.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
RE: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/beehive/nightlies/1.0m1-rc2/
Given that I see:
- notice in directory
- proper naming for distribution files
- notice in files
- community agreed to deliver a milestone
+1 from me.
--- Noel
Re: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
Posted by Kyle Marvin <ky...@gmail.com>.
+1
-- Kyle
On 5/31/05, Eddie ONeil <ek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All--
>
> Continuing on the 1.0m1 release train, we've got rc2 installers that
> are now posted here:
>
> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/beehive/nightlies/1.0m1-rc2/
>
> I'm proposing that we promote these to be released as 1.0rc1. They
> are complete and we expect no further changes unless any issues or
> BLOCKERs come up during voting.
>
> Same deal as before; voting options are below.
>
> The vote will close in about 72 hours at 00:00 GMT (12 AM) on
> Saturday, June 4, 2005.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Eddie
>
> Vote:
> [+1] Yes, the release is ready to go from the URL above.
> [0] Abstain / not sure.
> [-1] No, the release is not ready yet. If you vote this way, please
> provide an explanation why and add what could be done to address your
> concerns.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
Posted by Richard Feit <ri...@bea.com>.
+1 !
Eddie O'Neil wrote:
>
> Fat fingered the name below -- we'd like to release this as "1.0m1".
>
> <sigh/>
>
> :)
>
> Eddie
>
>
>
> Eddie ONeil wrote:
>
>> All--
>>
>> Continuing on the 1.0m1 release train, we've got rc2 installers that
>> are now posted here:
>>
>> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/beehive/nightlies/1.0m1-rc2/
>>
>> I'm proposing that we promote these to be released as 1.0rc1. They
>> are complete and we expect no further changes unless any issues or
>> BLOCKERs come up during voting.
>>
>> Same deal as before; voting options are below.
>>
>> The vote will close in about 72 hours at 00:00 GMT (12 AM) on
>> Saturday, June 4, 2005.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Eddie
>>
>> Vote:
>> [+1] Yes, the release is ready to go from the URL above.
>> [0] Abstain / not sure.
>> [-1] No, the release is not ready yet. If you vote this way, please
>> provide an explanation why and add what could be done to address your
>> concerns.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
Re: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
Posted by Richard Feit <ri...@bea.com>.
+1 !
Eddie O'Neil wrote:
>
> Fat fingered the name below -- we'd like to release this as "1.0m1".
>
> <sigh/>
>
> :)
>
> Eddie
>
>
>
> Eddie ONeil wrote:
>
>> All--
>>
>> Continuing on the 1.0m1 release train, we've got rc2 installers that
>> are now posted here:
>>
>> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/beehive/nightlies/1.0m1-rc2/
>>
>> I'm proposing that we promote these to be released as 1.0rc1. They
>> are complete and we expect no further changes unless any issues or
>> BLOCKERs come up during voting.
>>
>> Same deal as before; voting options are below.
>>
>> The vote will close in about 72 hours at 00:00 GMT (12 AM) on
>> Saturday, June 4, 2005.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Eddie
>>
>> Vote:
>> [+1] Yes, the release is ready to go from the URL above.
>> [0] Abstain / not sure.
>> [-1] No, the release is not ready yet. If you vote this way, please
>> provide an explanation why and add what could be done to address your
>> concerns.
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
Posted by Eddie O'Neil <ek...@bea.com>.
Fat fingered the name below -- we'd like to release this as "1.0m1".
<sigh/>
:)
Eddie
Eddie ONeil wrote:
> All--
>
> Continuing on the 1.0m1 release train, we've got rc2 installers that
> are now posted here:
>
> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/beehive/nightlies/1.0m1-rc2/
>
> I'm proposing that we promote these to be released as 1.0rc1. They
> are complete and we expect no further changes unless any issues or
> BLOCKERs come up during voting.
>
> Same deal as before; voting options are below.
>
> The vote will close in about 72 hours at 00:00 GMT (12 AM) on
> Saturday, June 4, 2005.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Eddie
>
> Vote:
> [+1] Yes, the release is ready to go from the URL above.
> [0] Abstain / not sure.
> [-1] No, the release is not ready yet. If you vote this way, please
> provide an explanation why and add what could be done to address your
> concerns.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
Posted by Bryan Che <bc...@redhat.com>.
+1
Bryan
Eddie ONeil wrote:
> All--
>
> Continuing on the 1.0m1 release train, we've got rc2 installers that
> are now posted here:
>
> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/beehive/nightlies/1.0m1-rc2/
>
> I'm proposing that we promote these to be released as 1.0rc1. They
> are complete and we expect no further changes unless any issues or
> BLOCKERs come up during voting.
>
> Same deal as before; voting options are below.
>
> The vote will close in about 72 hours at 00:00 GMT (12 AM) on
> Saturday, June 4, 2005.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Eddie
>
> Vote:
> [+1] Yes, the release is ready to go from the URL above.
> [0] Abstain / not sure.
> [-1] No, the release is not ready yet. If you vote this way, please
> provide an explanation why and add what could be done to address your
> concerns.
Re: Beehive status?
Posted by Eddie ONeil <ek...@gmail.com>.
Noel--
I've updated the Beehive status here:
http://incubator.apache.org/projects/beehive.html
Still have to add project-specific goals.
We'll be sure to keep this current going forward.
Eddie
On 6/5/05, Eddie ONeil <ek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Noel--
>
> This is a great question -- apologies that it's not more discernable
> from the web site. It's unfortunate that it hasn't been updated in a
> while...I'll take care of getting it current.
>
> I'll give my take on our status -- anyone else who has an opinion,
> feel free to chime in.
>
> I believe that Beehive is making good progress toward graduating
> from the Incubator. We started out having a good mix of
> corporate-sponsored (BEA) and non-sponsored committers and have added
> two others over the course of the last 10 months or so. These are:
>
> Fumitada Hattori (Wolfgang) -- 12/17/2004
> Bryan Che -- 2/7/2005
>
> In addition, the pipeline of potential committers is building across
> Beehive. I know of non-sponsored individuals working on:
>
> - Tomcat 5.5 security integration for NetUI Page Flow
> - A Maven 2.0 plugin for building Beehive projects
> - Documentation of Ant used to build Beehive source artifacts
>
> I'm quite excited about starting to see this kind of contribution as
> one or all of these would put an individual on a path to
> committership. And, these are the beginnings of the contributions I'd
> expect to see as the community starts to use more stable Beehive
> releases.
>
> The last status report I saw was on 4/26/05:
>
> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200504.mbox/%3c4B2B4C417991364996F035E1EE39E2E102DA2E0D@uskiex01.bea.com%3e
>
> In it, we expressed our intention to push to a 1.0-level release. As
> a result of driving toward this, I think we've had fewer design-type
> discussion on beehive-dev@ and have been talking more about samples,
> nightlies, and other release issues. I agree that there has been a
> disproportionate quantity of JIRA mail -- part of this is BEA having
> testers looking at Beehive.
>
> Admittedly, WSM has stagnated a bit since the spring given the time
> it's taken to finalize the JSR 181 spec. Once that is public, I hope
> we'll be able to have Wolfgang, Ias, and Dims helping with the work to
> pass the TCK under the NDA terms Geir has provided.
>
> Today, we're really done with a 1.0 for Beehive's Controls and NetUI
> components. I would personally like to see Beehive get an "official"
> 1.0 done (more on this below) in order to further help community
> building. One thing that would help would be decoupling WSM from our
> release cycle until the TCK work is done (was honestly going to bring
> this up on beehive-dev@ tomorrow). Otherwise, Controls and NetUI are
> being held up and we're keeping stable software from our potential
> community. We've also tabled some design discussions in beehive-dev@
> and in JIRA bugs (for example, around Controls) until the 1.0 is
> complete.
>
> There is definitely interest in approaching other projects like
> Struts, MyFaces, Geronimo, HiveMind, Velocity, and Spring to look at
> how we can integrate and work together going forward. In driving to
> 1.0, I've certainly not been focusing on this but would love to build
> a Control container for Geronimo. Definitely more of this sort of
> thing to come. :)
>
> Overall with Community Building -- I think we "get it" now. I'm
> definitely committed to being very transparent about design decisions
> and code with Beehive going forward and I'm sure others are as well.
> It's been a good lesson to learn while in the Incubator.
>
> As far as an "official" release goes -- I know this isn't generally
> possible in the Incubator, so it'd be great if we could discuss our
> options. These seem to be to call it 1.0 (and of course still satisfy
> the incubation branding requirements). Or, we can start talking about
> what steps we need to take in order to graduate Beehive from the
> Incubator so that we can do so. Anyone have thoughts on this?
>
> So, that's where we are...does that help?
>
> Thoughts / comments / flames welcome. :)
>
> Eddie
>
>
> On 6/5/05, Noel J. Bergman <no...@devtech.com> wrote:
> > What is the status of Beehive?
> >
> > I will preface this by indicating that I was looking to see how Beehive was
> > progressing towards leaving the Incubator. So I started out to see if there
> > were new committers being considered, new names coming along, or just how
> > discussions were occurring, and I'm not seeing any. I do see that the
> > project status shows a mix of Committers from multiple vectors (SVN logs
> > appear to show two committers added since August 2004, both non-BEA -- not a
> > lot, but not nothing), although I have not looked to see how active any
> > given Committer has been in the community.
> >
> > Taking a look at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/beehive.html, it
> > appears to need some updating. It doesn't record decisions such as adding
> > new committers, although it reflects their presence. Reviewing the
> > Quarterly reports for this year, I realize that Beehive has not provided any
> > content for them since last Fall.
> >
> > Reviewing the past several months of archives for beehive-dev, I notice that
> > a very high percentage of messages are JIRA notices. Hardly any developer
> > discussion appears on the mailing list. Where is it happening? I expected,
> > for example, that I might see discussions between beehive, Struts and
> > MyFaces developers, considering that one of the challenges for Struts v2 is
> > JSF integration, and beehive is also addressing that issue. I do see good
> > discussions on beehive-user, but those relate to using beehive, albeit as a
> > developer, rather than developing it.
> >
> > All of this relates to Community Building. What is the perception within
> > Beehive? Am I just missing things?
> >
> > --- Noel
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: Beehive status?
Posted by Eddie ONeil <ek...@gmail.com>.
Noel--
This is a great question -- apologies that it's not more discernable
from the web site. It's unfortunate that it hasn't been updated in a
while...I'll take care of getting it current.
I'll give my take on our status -- anyone else who has an opinion,
feel free to chime in.
I believe that Beehive is making good progress toward graduating
from the Incubator. We started out having a good mix of
corporate-sponsored (BEA) and non-sponsored committers and have added
two others over the course of the last 10 months or so. These are:
Fumitada Hattori (Wolfgang) -- 12/17/2004
Bryan Che -- 2/7/2005
In addition, the pipeline of potential committers is building across
Beehive. I know of non-sponsored individuals working on:
- Tomcat 5.5 security integration for NetUI Page Flow
- A Maven 2.0 plugin for building Beehive projects
- Documentation of Ant used to build Beehive source artifacts
I'm quite excited about starting to see this kind of contribution as
one or all of these would put an individual on a path to
committership. And, these are the beginnings of the contributions I'd
expect to see as the community starts to use more stable Beehive
releases.
The last status report I saw was on 4/26/05:
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-general/200504.mbox/%3c4B2B4C417991364996F035E1EE39E2E102DA2E0D@uskiex01.bea.com%3e
In it, we expressed our intention to push to a 1.0-level release. As
a result of driving toward this, I think we've had fewer design-type
discussion on beehive-dev@ and have been talking more about samples,
nightlies, and other release issues. I agree that there has been a
disproportionate quantity of JIRA mail -- part of this is BEA having
testers looking at Beehive.
Admittedly, WSM has stagnated a bit since the spring given the time
it's taken to finalize the JSR 181 spec. Once that is public, I hope
we'll be able to have Wolfgang, Ias, and Dims helping with the work to
pass the TCK under the NDA terms Geir has provided.
Today, we're really done with a 1.0 for Beehive's Controls and NetUI
components. I would personally like to see Beehive get an "official"
1.0 done (more on this below) in order to further help community
building. One thing that would help would be decoupling WSM from our
release cycle until the TCK work is done (was honestly going to bring
this up on beehive-dev@ tomorrow). Otherwise, Controls and NetUI are
being held up and we're keeping stable software from our potential
community. We've also tabled some design discussions in beehive-dev@
and in JIRA bugs (for example, around Controls) until the 1.0 is
complete.
There is definitely interest in approaching other projects like
Struts, MyFaces, Geronimo, HiveMind, Velocity, and Spring to look at
how we can integrate and work together going forward. In driving to
1.0, I've certainly not been focusing on this but would love to build
a Control container for Geronimo. Definitely more of this sort of
thing to come. :)
Overall with Community Building -- I think we "get it" now. I'm
definitely committed to being very transparent about design decisions
and code with Beehive going forward and I'm sure others are as well.
It's been a good lesson to learn while in the Incubator.
As far as an "official" release goes -- I know this isn't generally
possible in the Incubator, so it'd be great if we could discuss our
options. These seem to be to call it 1.0 (and of course still satisfy
the incubation branding requirements). Or, we can start talking about
what steps we need to take in order to graduate Beehive from the
Incubator so that we can do so. Anyone have thoughts on this?
So, that's where we are...does that help?
Thoughts / comments / flames welcome. :)
Eddie
On 6/5/05, Noel J. Bergman <no...@devtech.com> wrote:
> What is the status of Beehive?
>
> I will preface this by indicating that I was looking to see how Beehive was
> progressing towards leaving the Incubator. So I started out to see if there
> were new committers being considered, new names coming along, or just how
> discussions were occurring, and I'm not seeing any. I do see that the
> project status shows a mix of Committers from multiple vectors (SVN logs
> appear to show two committers added since August 2004, both non-BEA -- not a
> lot, but not nothing), although I have not looked to see how active any
> given Committer has been in the community.
>
> Taking a look at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/beehive.html, it
> appears to need some updating. It doesn't record decisions such as adding
> new committers, although it reflects their presence. Reviewing the
> Quarterly reports for this year, I realize that Beehive has not provided any
> content for them since last Fall.
>
> Reviewing the past several months of archives for beehive-dev, I notice that
> a very high percentage of messages are JIRA notices. Hardly any developer
> discussion appears on the mailing list. Where is it happening? I expected,
> for example, that I might see discussions between beehive, Struts and
> MyFaces developers, considering that one of the challenges for Struts v2 is
> JSF integration, and beehive is also addressing that issue. I do see good
> discussions on beehive-user, but those relate to using beehive, albeit as a
> developer, rather than developing it.
>
> All of this relates to Community Building. What is the perception within
> Beehive? Am I just missing things?
>
> --- Noel
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Beehive status?
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
What is the status of Beehive?
I will preface this by indicating that I was looking to see how Beehive was
progressing towards leaving the Incubator. So I started out to see if there
were new committers being considered, new names coming along, or just how
discussions were occurring, and I'm not seeing any. I do see that the
project status shows a mix of Committers from multiple vectors (SVN logs
appear to show two committers added since August 2004, both non-BEA -- not a
lot, but not nothing), although I have not looked to see how active any
given Committer has been in the community.
Taking a look at http://incubator.apache.org/projects/beehive.html, it
appears to need some updating. It doesn't record decisions such as adding
new committers, although it reflects their presence. Reviewing the
Quarterly reports for this year, I realize that Beehive has not provided any
content for them since last Fall.
Reviewing the past several months of archives for beehive-dev, I notice that
a very high percentage of messages are JIRA notices. Hardly any developer
discussion appears on the mailing list. Where is it happening? I expected,
for example, that I might see discussions between beehive, Struts and
MyFaces developers, considering that one of the challenges for Struts v2 is
JSF integration, and beehive is also addressing that issue. I do see good
discussions on beehive-user, but those relate to using beehive, albeit as a
developer, rather than developing it.
All of this relates to Community Building. What is the perception within
Beehive? Am I just missing things?
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
[result] Re: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
Posted by Eddie ONeil <ek...@gmail.com>.
We've reached the end of the vote to promote 1.0m1-rc2 to 1.0m1 status.
These votes were received:
Binding +1 votes: 10 (including Craig's [Mentor] and Noel's [Incubator PMC])
Non-binding +1 votes: 1
-1 / 0 votes: 0
Thus, we'll promote rc2 to 1.0m1 and will have signed installers
available tomorrow.
Congrats to all and great work!
Eddie
On 6/5/05, Eddie ONeil <ek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Noel--
>
> We are voting on a real milestone -- 1.0m1-rc2; is there anything we
> need to do to formally request Incubator PMC approval?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Eddie
>
>
> On 6/4/05, Noel J. Bergman <no...@devtech.com> wrote:
> > > Does this Beehive 1.0m1 release need approval from your end?
> >
> > If you wanted to post it up as a milestone rather than a dated nightly, yes.
> >
> > --- Noel
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
[result] Re: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
Posted by Eddie ONeil <ek...@gmail.com>.
We've reached the end of the vote to promote 1.0m1-rc2 to 1.0m1 status.
These votes were received:
Binding +1 votes: 10 (including Craig's [Mentor] and Noel's [Incubator PMC])
Non-binding +1 votes: 1
-1 / 0 votes: 0
Thus, we'll promote rc2 to 1.0m1 and will have signed installers
available tomorrow.
Congrats to all and great work!
Eddie
On 6/5/05, Eddie ONeil <ek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Noel--
>
> We are voting on a real milestone -- 1.0m1-rc2; is there anything we
> need to do to formally request Incubator PMC approval?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Eddie
>
>
> On 6/4/05, Noel J. Bergman <no...@devtech.com> wrote:
> > > Does this Beehive 1.0m1 release need approval from your end?
> >
> > If you wanted to post it up as a milestone rather than a dated nightly, yes.
> >
> > --- Noel
> >
> >
>
Re: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
Posted by Eddie ONeil <ek...@gmail.com>.
Please disregard -- Noel and I crossed paths. I believe we've got
all of the approvals needed to finalize the release. Summary coming
shortly.
Thanks, Noel!
Eddie
On 6/5/05, Eddie ONeil <ek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Noel--
>
> We are voting on a real milestone -- 1.0m1-rc2; is there anything we
> need to do to formally request Incubator PMC approval?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Eddie
>
>
> On 6/4/05, Noel J. Bergman <no...@devtech.com> wrote:
> > > Does this Beehive 1.0m1 release need approval from your end?
> >
> > If you wanted to post it up as a milestone rather than a dated nightly, yes.
> >
> > --- Noel
> >
> >
>
Re: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
Posted by Eddie ONeil <ek...@gmail.com>.
Please disregard -- Noel and I crossed paths. I believe we've got
all of the approvals needed to finalize the release. Summary coming
shortly.
Thanks, Noel!
Eddie
On 6/5/05, Eddie ONeil <ek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Noel--
>
> We are voting on a real milestone -- 1.0m1-rc2; is there anything we
> need to do to formally request Incubator PMC approval?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Eddie
>
>
> On 6/4/05, Noel J. Bergman <no...@devtech.com> wrote:
> > > Does this Beehive 1.0m1 release need approval from your end?
> >
> > If you wanted to post it up as a milestone rather than a dated nightly, yes.
> >
> > --- Noel
> >
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
Posted by Eddie ONeil <ek...@gmail.com>.
Noel--
We are voting on a real milestone -- 1.0m1-rc2; is there anything we
need to do to formally request Incubator PMC approval?
Thanks!
Eddie
On 6/4/05, Noel J. Bergman <no...@devtech.com> wrote:
> > Does this Beehive 1.0m1 release need approval from your end?
>
> If you wanted to post it up as a milestone rather than a dated nightly, yes.
>
> --- Noel
>
>
Re: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
Posted by Eddie ONeil <ek...@gmail.com>.
Noel--
We are voting on a real milestone -- 1.0m1-rc2; is there anything we
need to do to formally request Incubator PMC approval?
Thanks!
Eddie
On 6/4/05, Noel J. Bergman <no...@devtech.com> wrote:
> > Does this Beehive 1.0m1 release need approval from your end?
>
> If you wanted to post it up as a milestone rather than a dated nightly, yes.
>
> --- Noel
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
RE: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
> Does this Beehive 1.0m1 release need approval from your end?
If you wanted to post it up as a milestone rather than a dated nightly, yes.
--- Noel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
RE: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
Posted by "Noel J. Bergman" <no...@devtech.com>.
> Does this Beehive 1.0m1 release need approval from your end?
If you wanted to post it up as a milestone rather than a dated nightly, yes.
--- Noel
Re: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
Posted by Eddie ONeil <ek...@gmail.com>.
Incubator PMC--
Does this Beehive 1.0m1 release need approval from your end?
Thanks!
Eddie
On 6/3/05, Craig McClanahan <cr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Craig McClanahan (Beehive Mentor)
>
>
> On 5/31/05, Eddie ONeil <ek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > All--
> >
> > Continuing on the 1.0m1 release train, we've got rc2 installers that
> > are now posted here:
> >
> > http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/beehive/nightlies/1.0m1-rc2/
> >
> > I'm proposing that we promote these to be released as 1.0rc1. They
> > are complete and we expect no further changes unless any issues or
> > BLOCKERs come up during voting.
> >
> > Same deal as before; voting options are below.
> >
> > The vote will close in about 72 hours at 00:00 GMT (12 AM) on
> > Saturday, June 4, 2005.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Eddie
> >
> > Vote:
> > [+1] Yes, the release is ready to go from the URL above.
> > [0] Abstain / not sure.
> > [-1] No, the release is not ready yet. If you vote this way, please
> > provide an explanation why and add what could be done to address your
> > concerns.
> >
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
Posted by Eddie ONeil <ek...@gmail.com>.
Incubator PMC--
Does this Beehive 1.0m1 release need approval from your end?
Thanks!
Eddie
On 6/3/05, Craig McClanahan <cr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> Craig McClanahan (Beehive Mentor)
>
>
> On 5/31/05, Eddie ONeil <ek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > All--
> >
> > Continuing on the 1.0m1 release train, we've got rc2 installers that
> > are now posted here:
> >
> > http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/beehive/nightlies/1.0m1-rc2/
> >
> > I'm proposing that we promote these to be released as 1.0rc1. They
> > are complete and we expect no further changes unless any issues or
> > BLOCKERs come up during voting.
> >
> > Same deal as before; voting options are below.
> >
> > The vote will close in about 72 hours at 00:00 GMT (12 AM) on
> > Saturday, June 4, 2005.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > Eddie
> >
> > Vote:
> > [+1] Yes, the release is ready to go from the URL above.
> > [0] Abstain / not sure.
> > [-1] No, the release is not ready yet. If you vote this way, please
> > provide an explanation why and add what could be done to address your
> > concerns.
> >
>
Re: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
Posted by Craig McClanahan <cr...@gmail.com>.
+1
Craig McClanahan (Beehive Mentor)
On 5/31/05, Eddie ONeil <ek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All--
>
> Continuing on the 1.0m1 release train, we've got rc2 installers that
> are now posted here:
>
> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/beehive/nightlies/1.0m1-rc2/
>
> I'm proposing that we promote these to be released as 1.0rc1. They
> are complete and we expect no further changes unless any issues or
> BLOCKERs come up during voting.
>
> Same deal as before; voting options are below.
>
> The vote will close in about 72 hours at 00:00 GMT (12 AM) on
> Saturday, June 4, 2005.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Eddie
>
> Vote:
> [+1] Yes, the release is ready to go from the URL above.
> [0] Abstain / not sure.
> [-1] No, the release is not ready yet. If you vote this way, please
> provide an explanation why and add what could be done to address your
> concerns.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
Posted by Eddie O'Neil <ek...@bea.com>.
Fat fingered the name below -- we'd like to release this as "1.0m1".
<sigh/>
:)
Eddie
Eddie ONeil wrote:
> All--
>
> Continuing on the 1.0m1 release train, we've got rc2 installers that
> are now posted here:
>
> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/beehive/nightlies/1.0m1-rc2/
>
> I'm proposing that we promote these to be released as 1.0rc1. They
> are complete and we expect no further changes unless any issues or
> BLOCKERs come up during voting.
>
> Same deal as before; voting options are below.
>
> The vote will close in about 72 hours at 00:00 GMT (12 AM) on
> Saturday, June 4, 2005.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Eddie
>
> Vote:
> [+1] Yes, the release is ready to go from the URL above.
> [0] Abstain / not sure.
> [-1] No, the release is not ready yet. If you vote this way, please
> provide an explanation why and add what could be done to address your
> concerns.
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
Posted by Craig McClanahan <cr...@gmail.com>.
+1
Craig McClanahan (Beehive Mentor)
On 5/31/05, Eddie ONeil <ek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All--
>
> Continuing on the 1.0m1 release train, we've got rc2 installers that
> are now posted here:
>
> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/beehive/nightlies/1.0m1-rc2/
>
> I'm proposing that we promote these to be released as 1.0rc1. They
> are complete and we expect no further changes unless any issues or
> BLOCKERs come up during voting.
>
> Same deal as before; voting options are below.
>
> The vote will close in about 72 hours at 00:00 GMT (12 AM) on
> Saturday, June 4, 2005.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Eddie
>
> Vote:
> [+1] Yes, the release is ready to go from the URL above.
> [0] Abstain / not sure.
> [-1] No, the release is not ready yet. If you vote this way, please
> provide an explanation why and add what could be done to address your
> concerns.
>
Re: [vote] beehive v1.0m1-rc2
Posted by Kyle Marvin <ky...@gmail.com>.
+1
-- Kyle
On 5/31/05, Eddie ONeil <ek...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All--
>
> Continuing on the 1.0m1 release train, we've got rc2 installers that
> are now posted here:
>
> http://cvs.apache.org/dist/incubator/beehive/nightlies/1.0m1-rc2/
>
> I'm proposing that we promote these to be released as 1.0rc1. They
> are complete and we expect no further changes unless any issues or
> BLOCKERs come up during voting.
>
> Same deal as before; voting options are below.
>
> The vote will close in about 72 hours at 00:00 GMT (12 AM) on
> Saturday, June 4, 2005.
>
> Thanks!
>
> Eddie
>
> Vote:
> [+1] Yes, the release is ready to go from the URL above.
> [0] Abstain / not sure.
> [-1] No, the release is not ready yet. If you vote this way, please
> provide an explanation why and add what could be done to address your
> concerns.
>