Eventual release of MyFaces 1.2

[Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>]

Hi,

Now that we have a usable implementation of MyFaces 1.2 (not official
yet) we could start thinking on doing a release. Can we legally have a
release called MyFaces 1.2 even if we don't have the acknowledgement
from Sun that it is conformant to the TCK? Otherwise we can always
release a MyFaces 1.2 beta or milestone whatever.
Anyway, to release MyFaces 1.2 we need to release first Trinidad's
maven-faces-plugin 1.2. Could we think then too on releasing the
Trinidad artifacts, or at least, this one?
At the same time and coinciding with this release, I would adopt
Manfred's idea of having the two "trunks" as the tomcat guys do, one
for myfaces 1.1 and the other for myfaces 1.2.

Thoughts? Any limitation, legal or functional, that we must deal with
before releasing MyFaces 1.2-whatever?

Cheers,

Bruno

Re: Eventual release of MyFaces 1.2

[Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>]

A release of the Trinidad 1.2 plugins would be nice.
I am not having time to do, feel free to volunteer here.

the stuff has to be called myfaces-milestone or something like that

Please note, that the artifact (jar) should be named
"apache-myfaces-core/api-1.2-milestone1.jar"

thx

On 5/16/07, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now that we have a usable implementation of MyFaces 1.2 (not official
> yet) we could start thinking on doing a release. Can we legally have a
> release called MyFaces 1.2 even if we don't have the acknowledgement
> from Sun that it is conformant to the TCK? Otherwise we can always
> release a MyFaces 1.2 beta or milestone whatever.
> Anyway, to release MyFaces 1.2 we need to release first Trinidad's
> maven-faces-plugin 1.2. Could we think then too on releasing the
> Trinidad artifacts, or at least, this one?
> At the same time and coinciding with this release, I would adopt
> Manfred's idea of having the two "trunks" as the tomcat guys do, one
> for myfaces 1.1 and the other for myfaces 1.2.
>
> Thoughts? Any limitation, legal or functional, that we must deal with
> before releasing MyFaces 1.2-whatever?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bruno
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh

further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Re: Eventual release of MyFaces 1.2

[Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>]

It think that needs to be addressed before.

-M

On 5/17/07, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Ah! Didn't remember it... it is ok for me,
>
> What about the plugins?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bruno
>
> On 17/05/07, Paul Spencer <pa...@apache.org> wrote:
> > Do we want to revisit the version number discussion [1]?
> >
> > [1]http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@myfaces.apache.org/msg20390.html
> >
> > Paul Spencer
> >
> > Bruno Aranda wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Now that we have a usable implementation of MyFaces 1.2 (not official
> > > yet) we could start thinking on doing a release. Can we legally have a
> > > release called MyFaces 1.2 even if we don't have the acknowledgement
> > > from Sun that it is conformant to the TCK? Otherwise we can always
> > > release a MyFaces 1.2 beta or milestone whatever.
> > > Anyway, to release MyFaces 1.2 we need to release first Trinidad's
> > > maven-faces-plugin 1.2. Could we think then too on releasing the
> > > Trinidad artifacts, or at least, this one?
> > > At the same time and coinciding with this release, I would adopt
> > > Manfred's idea of having the two "trunks" as the tomcat guys do, one
> > > for myfaces 1.1 and the other for myfaces 1.2.
> > >
> > > Thoughts? Any limitation, legal or functional, that we must deal with
> > > before releasing MyFaces 1.2-whatever?
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Bruno
> > >
> >
> >
>


-- 
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh

further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com

Re: Eventual release of MyFaces 1.2

[Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com>]

Ah! Didn't remember it... it is ok for me,

What about the plugins?

Cheers,

Bruno

On 17/05/07, Paul Spencer <pa...@apache.org> wrote:
> Do we want to revisit the version number discussion [1]?
>
> [1]http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@myfaces.apache.org/msg20390.html
>
> Paul Spencer
>
> Bruno Aranda wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Now that we have a usable implementation of MyFaces 1.2 (not official
> > yet) we could start thinking on doing a release. Can we legally have a
> > release called MyFaces 1.2 even if we don't have the acknowledgement
> > from Sun that it is conformant to the TCK? Otherwise we can always
> > release a MyFaces 1.2 beta or milestone whatever.
> > Anyway, to release MyFaces 1.2 we need to release first Trinidad's
> > maven-faces-plugin 1.2. Could we think then too on releasing the
> > Trinidad artifacts, or at least, this one?
> > At the same time and coinciding with this release, I would adopt
> > Manfred's idea of having the two "trunks" as the tomcat guys do, one
> > for myfaces 1.1 and the other for myfaces 1.2.
> >
> > Thoughts? Any limitation, legal or functional, that we must deal with
> > before releasing MyFaces 1.2-whatever?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Bruno
> >
>
>

Re: Eventual release of MyFaces 1.2

[Paul Spencer <pa...@apache.org>]

Do we want to revisit the version number discussion [1]?

[1]http://www.mail-archive.com/dev@myfaces.apache.org/msg20390.html

Paul Spencer

Bruno Aranda wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Now that we have a usable implementation of MyFaces 1.2 (not official
> yet) we could start thinking on doing a release. Can we legally have a
> release called MyFaces 1.2 even if we don't have the acknowledgement
> from Sun that it is conformant to the TCK? Otherwise we can always
> release a MyFaces 1.2 beta or milestone whatever.
> Anyway, to release MyFaces 1.2 we need to release first Trinidad's
> maven-faces-plugin 1.2. Could we think then too on releasing the
> Trinidad artifacts, or at least, this one?
> At the same time and coinciding with this release, I would adopt
> Manfred's idea of having the two "trunks" as the tomcat guys do, one
> for myfaces 1.1 and the other for myfaces 1.2.
> 
> Thoughts? Any limitation, legal or functional, that we must deal with
> before releasing MyFaces 1.2-whatever?
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Bruno
> 

Re: Eventual release of MyFaces 1.2

[Manfred Geiler <ma...@gmail.com>]

Yes, and the good news is: We just got a notification from Geir that
everything is fine and we are already allowed to officially release
the 1.2 impl.
Since I'm on vacation now I will not be able to do the release work
before Monday. But I will try everything possible and impossible to
get a release out at the end of next week.

--Manfred


On 5/16/07, Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The version number is our software version number.   The code is our
> code.   We can do whatever we like so long as we meet ASF legal
> requirements and provided we don't claim any particular certification.
>
> On 5/16/07, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Now that we have a usable implementation of MyFaces 1.2 (not official
> > yet) we could start thinking on doing a release. Can we legally have a
> > release called MyFaces 1.2 even if we don't have the acknowledgement
> > from Sun that it is conformant to the TCK? Otherwise we can always
> > release a MyFaces 1.2 beta or milestone whatever.
> > Anyway, to release MyFaces 1.2 we need to release first Trinidad's
> > maven-faces-plugin 1.2. Could we think then too on releasing the
> > Trinidad artifacts, or at least, this one?
> > At the same time and coinciding with this release, I would adopt
> > Manfred's idea of having the two "trunks" as the tomcat guys do, one
> > for myfaces 1.1 and the other for myfaces 1.2.
> >
> > Thoughts? Any limitation, legal or functional, that we must deal with
> > before releasing MyFaces 1.2-whatever?
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Bruno
> >
>


-- 
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse - JSF Consulting,
Development and Courses in English and
German

Professional Support for Apache MyFaces

Re: Eventual release of MyFaces 1.2

[Mike Kienenberger <mk...@gmail.com>]

The version number is our software version number.   The code is our
code.   We can do whatever we like so long as we meet ASF legal
requirements and provided we don't claim any particular certification.

On 5/16/07, Bruno Aranda <br...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Now that we have a usable implementation of MyFaces 1.2 (not official
> yet) we could start thinking on doing a release. Can we legally have a
> release called MyFaces 1.2 even if we don't have the acknowledgement
> from Sun that it is conformant to the TCK? Otherwise we can always
> release a MyFaces 1.2 beta or milestone whatever.
> Anyway, to release MyFaces 1.2 we need to release first Trinidad's
> maven-faces-plugin 1.2. Could we think then too on releasing the
> Trinidad artifacts, or at least, this one?
> At the same time and coinciding with this release, I would adopt
> Manfred's idea of having the two "trunks" as the tomcat guys do, one
> for myfaces 1.1 and the other for myfaces 1.2.
>
> Thoughts? Any limitation, legal or functional, that we must deal with
> before releasing MyFaces 1.2-whatever?
>
> Cheers,
>
> Bruno
>