You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@isis.apache.org by Dan Haywood <dk...@gmail.com> on 2011/01/05 08:44:30 UTC
Re: i18n and implementation strategies
On 05/01/2011 07:17, Sabine Winkler wrote:
> hi,
>
> happy new year! I read your answer to the "I18N" question and tried to
> get it run. nice feature! may I ask some questions on this:
> 1) I would provide a short documentation how to get this run - I could
> write it as a sub-site (like "Security") at a "draft".
Since this should be part of the official documentation, it ought to go
into a DocBook. The one I think it should live in is the "core" docbook
that I'm currently working on (in core/src/docbkx/guide/isis-core.xml or
something like).
Two options:
1. edit this file then send me a patch
2. write something up in the wiki, which I'll then copy over to
isis-core.xml.
I think that (2) is probably easier, and more immediately valuable.
> 2) There was a small bug - the "normal" way is to open a bug and
> report a fix in JIRA - correct?
Yes. And if you have a fix, then attach the patch.
> 3) @ISIS-69 - "Get rid of some (and ideally all) of the
> FacetDecorators" - within the last days I startet to get a deeper
> understanding of the facet decorators. You gave me the hint to look at
> the TransactionXXX as an example/template for the
> Test(Scenario)Reciever. As I understand you right this should be
> better implemented with a FacetFactory (e.q.
> NamedAnnotationFacetFactory and so on). While I am not familiar with
> this - one stupid question - is there any configuration how to
> "register" an new factory?
Yeah, I detailed how to register a new factory in my reply on isis-dev;
use the facets.include property.
isis.reflector.facets.include=com.mycompany.MyNamedFacetFactory
You could also exclude the original facet factory using the
facets.exclude property:
isis.reflector.facets.exclude=org.apache.isis.core.progmodel.facets.naming.named.NamedAnnotationFacetFactory
However, I think it probably isn't necessary to do this as the custom
one explicitly included above will overwrite any facets installed by the
default one.
Cheers
Dan
>
>
> thanks,
> sabine
>
Re: i18n and implementation strategies
Posted by Dan Haywood <dk...@gmail.com>.
Hi Mark
Could you grant Sabine access to the wiki? Sabine isn't a committer,
but we do have precedent of letting other non-committers (eg Mike B)
being granted access, I think.
~~~
Other mentors:
Do we know if Mark is not available for any reason? Can you chase him
too (or do the work instead)?
Thx
Dan
~~~~~~
On 14/01/2011 13:39, Sabine Winkler wrote:
> hi mark,
>
> I wrote this message last week and so I am trying again now ;-)
>
> thx for response,
> sabine
>
> Am 05.01.2011 10:07, schrieb Sabine Winkler:
>> hi mark,
>>
>> I would like write some documentation on "How to ... I18N" and Dan
>> suggested me to do so in the ISIS wiki.
>> While I am having an Apache account I do not have any "edit"
>> permissions. Can you give me these permissions?
>>
>> thx,
>> sabine
>>
>>
>> Am 05.01.2011 08:44, schrieb Dan Haywood:
>>>
>>> On 05/01/2011 07:17, Sabine Winkler wrote:
>>>> hi,
>>>>
>>>> happy new year! I read your answer to the "I18N" question and tried
>>>> to get it run. nice feature! may I ask some questions on this:
>>>> 1) I would provide a short documentation how to get this run - I
>>>> could write it as a sub-site (like "Security") at a "draft".
>>>
>>> Since this should be part of the official documentation, it ought to
>>> go into a DocBook. The one I think it should live in is the "core"
>>> docbook that I'm currently working on (in
>>> core/src/docbkx/guide/isis-core.xml or something like).
>>>
>>> Two options:
>>> 1. edit this file then send me a patch
>>> 2. write something up in the wiki, which I'll then copy over to
>>> isis-core.xml.
>>>
>>> I think that (2) is probably easier, and more immediately valuable.
>>>
>>>
>>>> 2) There was a small bug - the "normal" way is to open a bug and
>>>> report a fix in JIRA - correct?
>>> Yes. And if you have a fix, then attach the patch.
>>>
>>>
>>>> 3) @ISIS-69 - "Get rid of some (and ideally all) of the
>>>> FacetDecorators" - within the last days I startet to get a deeper
>>>> understanding of the facet decorators. You gave me the hint to look
>>>> at the TransactionXXX as an example/template for the
>>>> Test(Scenario)Reciever. As I understand you right this should be
>>>> better implemented with a FacetFactory (e.q.
>>>> NamedAnnotationFacetFactory and so on). While I am not familiar
>>>> with this - one stupid question - is there any configuration how to
>>>> "register" an new factory?
>>> Yeah, I detailed how to register a new factory in my reply on
>>> isis-dev; use the facets.include property.
>>>
>>> isis.reflector.facets.include=com.mycompany.MyNamedFacetFactory
>>>
>>> You could also exclude the original facet factory using the
>>> facets.exclude property:
>>>
>>> isis.reflector.facets.exclude=org.apache.isis.core.progmodel.facets.naming.named.NamedAnnotationFacetFactory
>>>
>>>
>>> However, I think it probably isn't necessary to do this as the
>>> custom one explicitly included above will overwrite any facets
>>> installed by the default one.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>> sabine
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: i18n and implementation strategies
Posted by Siegfried Goeschl <sg...@gmx.at>.
Hi Mark,
any updates on the a "CWiki isis-admin role"?
Thanks in advance
Siegfried Goeschl
On 1/28/11 8:31 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> oki, iCLA is on file now so I enabled the write access for Sabine in our Wiki.
>
> Have fun editing :)
>
> txs and LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
> --- On Sat, 1/22/11, Mark Struberg<st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
>
>> From: Mark Struberg<st...@yahoo.de>
>> Subject: Re: i18n and implementation strategies
>> To: isis-dev@incubator.apache.org, sw@sabinewinkler.com
>> Cc: "Sabine Winkler"<sw...@sabinewinkler.com>
>> Date: Saturday, January 22, 2011, 11:50 AM
>> Hi Sabine, Sigi!
>>
>> Sorry for not being that responsive last week, but we moved
>> to a new flat...
>>
>> Oki, back settled and equipped with internet again, I
>> looked what I can do.
>>
>> a) @Sabine: for getting you access to our wiki you need to
>> file a iCLA [1] (for general info see [2]) This basically
>> means that you have read the ALv2 and agree with it. Please
>> especially read section 4 of the iCLA which makes sure that
>> you have no company restriction from your employer which is
>> possibly limiting your rights to contribute.
>> Print it, sign it and scan it back in. Then please send the
>> signed iCLA to secretary@apache.org
>> . Craig Russel or Sam Ruby will take care of it and once you
>> show up on the committers page [3] we can give you access to
>> our wiki.
>>
>> Sorry for this process being so verbose, but you know. In
>> days where Oracle sues Google and stuff happening ... ;)
>>
>>
>> b) Sigi, I've checked our cwiki and it seems that we don't
>> have a isis-admin role yet. I think it would be the best
>> thing to get you general confluence admin rights as well.
>> Chattered about that on #asfinfra. I will send a quick mail
>> to the IPMC asking for further clarification.
>>
>> LieGrue,
>> strub
>>
>>
>>
>> [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
>> [2] http://www.apache.org/licenses
>> [3] http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
>>
>> --- On Fri, 1/21/11, Sabine Winkler<sw...@sabinewinkler.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> From: Sabine Winkler<sw...@sabinewinkler.com>
>>> Subject: Re: i18n and implementation strategies
>>> To: isis-dev@incubator.apache.org
>>> Date: Friday, January 21, 2011, 9:25 AM
>>> hi siegfried,
>>>
>>> thanks a lot - seems to be a "vienna connection" :-)
>>>
>>> cheers,
>>> sabine
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 21.01.2011 09:42, schrieb Siegfried Goeschl:
>>>> Hi Sabine,
>>>>
>>>> sorry for dropping the ball - Mark will give you
>> the
>>> edit rights today
>>>> (or make me to an Wiki administrator to help him)
>> ...
>>> :-)
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>>
>>>> Siegfried Goeschl
>>>>
>>>> On 1/14/11 2:39 PM, Sabine Winkler wrote:
>>>>> hi mark,
>>>>>
>>>>> I wrote this message last week and so I am
>> trying
>>> again now ;-)
>>>>>
>>>>> thx for response,
>>>>> sabine
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 05.01.2011 10:07, schrieb Sabine Winkler:
>>>>>> hi mark,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I would like write some documentation on
>> "How
>>> to ... I18N" and Dan
>>>>>> suggested me to do so in the ISIS wiki.
>>>>>> While I am having an Apache account I do
>> not
>>> have any "edit"
>>>>>> permissions. Can you give me these
>>> permissions?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> thx,
>>>>>> sabine
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 05.01.2011 08:44, schrieb Dan
>> Haywood:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 05/01/2011 07:17, Sabine Winkler
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>> hi,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> happy new year! I read your
>> answer to
>>> the "I18N" question and tried
>>>>>>>> to get it run. nice feature! may
>> I ask
>>> some questions on this:
>>>>>>>> 1) I would provide a short
>>> documentation how to get this run - I
>>>>>>>> could write it as a sub-site
>> (like
>>> "Security") at a "draft".
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since this should be part of the
>> official
>>> documentation, it ought to
>>>>>>> go into a DocBook. The one I think
>> it
>>> should live in is the "core"
>>>>>>> docbook that I'm currently working on
>> (in
>>>>>>> core/src/docbkx/guide/isis-core.xml
>> or
>>> something like).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Two options:
>>>>>>> 1. edit this file then send me a
>> patch
>>>>>>> 2. write something up in the wiki,
>> which
>>> I'll then copy over to
>>>>>>> isis-core.xml.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I think that (2) is probably easier,
>> and
>>> more immediately valuable.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2) There was a small bug - the
>>> "normal" way is to open a bug and
>>>>>>>> report a fix in JIRA - correct?
>>>>>>> Yes. And if you have a fix, then
>> attach
>>> the patch.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 3) @ISIS-69 - "Get rid of some
>> (and
>>> ideally all) of the
>>>>>>>> FacetDecorators" - within the
>> last
>>> days I startet to get a deeper
>>>>>>>> understanding of the facet
>> decorators.
>>> You gave me the hint to look
>>>>>>>> at the TransactionXXX as an
>>> example/template for the
>>>>>>>> Test(Scenario)Reciever. As I
>>> understand you right this should be
>>>>>>>> better implemented with a
>> FacetFactory
>>> (e.q.
>>>>>>>> NamedAnnotationFacetFactory and
>> so
>>> on). While I am not familiar with
>>>>>>>> this - one stupid question - is
>> there
>>> any configuration how to
>>>>>>>> "register" an new factory?
>>>>>>> Yeah, I detailed how to register a
>> new
>>> factory in my reply on
>>>>>>> isis-dev; use the facets.include
>>> property.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>
>> isis.reflector.facets.include=com.mycompany.MyNamedFacetFactory
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You could also exclude the original
>> facet
>>> factory using the
>>>>>>> facets.exclude property:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>
>> isis.reflector.facets.exclude=org.apache.isis.core.progmodel.facets.naming.named.NamedAnnotationFacetFactory
>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, I think it probably isn't
>>> necessary to do this as the custom
>>>>>>> one explicitly included above will
>>> overwrite any facets installed by
>>>>>>> the default one.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>> Dan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> thanks,
>>>>>>>> sabine
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
>
Re: i18n and implementation strategies
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
oki, iCLA is on file now so I enabled the write access for Sabine in our Wiki.
Have fun editing :)
txs and LieGrue,
strub
--- On Sat, 1/22/11, Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de> wrote:
> From: Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> Subject: Re: i18n and implementation strategies
> To: isis-dev@incubator.apache.org, sw@sabinewinkler.com
> Cc: "Sabine Winkler" <sw...@sabinewinkler.com>
> Date: Saturday, January 22, 2011, 11:50 AM
> Hi Sabine, Sigi!
>
> Sorry for not being that responsive last week, but we moved
> to a new flat...
>
> Oki, back settled and equipped with internet again, I
> looked what I can do.
>
> a) @Sabine: for getting you access to our wiki you need to
> file a iCLA [1] (for general info see [2]) This basically
> means that you have read the ALv2 and agree with it. Please
> especially read section 4 of the iCLA which makes sure that
> you have no company restriction from your employer which is
> possibly limiting your rights to contribute.
> Print it, sign it and scan it back in. Then please send the
> signed iCLA to secretary@apache.org
> . Craig Russel or Sam Ruby will take care of it and once you
> show up on the committers page [3] we can give you access to
> our wiki.
>
> Sorry for this process being so verbose, but you know. In
> days where Oracle sues Google and stuff happening ... ;)
>
>
> b) Sigi, I've checked our cwiki and it seems that we don't
> have a isis-admin role yet. I think it would be the best
> thing to get you general confluence admin rights as well.
> Chattered about that on #asfinfra. I will send a quick mail
> to the IPMC asking for further clarification.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
>
>
> [1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
> [2] http://www.apache.org/licenses
> [3] http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
>
> --- On Fri, 1/21/11, Sabine Winkler <sw...@sabinewinkler.com>
> wrote:
>
> > From: Sabine Winkler <sw...@sabinewinkler.com>
> > Subject: Re: i18n and implementation strategies
> > To: isis-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Date: Friday, January 21, 2011, 9:25 AM
> > hi siegfried,
> >
> > thanks a lot - seems to be a "vienna connection" :-)
> >
> > cheers,
> > sabine
> >
> >
> > Am 21.01.2011 09:42, schrieb Siegfried Goeschl:
> > > Hi Sabine,
> > >
> > > sorry for dropping the ball - Mark will give you
> the
> > edit rights today
> > > (or make me to an Wiki administrator to help him)
> ...
> > :-)
> > >
> > > Cheers,
> > >
> > > Siegfried Goeschl
> > >
> > > On 1/14/11 2:39 PM, Sabine Winkler wrote:
> > >> hi mark,
> > >>
> > >> I wrote this message last week and so I am
> trying
> > again now ;-)
> > >>
> > >> thx for response,
> > >> sabine
> > >>
> > >> Am 05.01.2011 10:07, schrieb Sabine Winkler:
> > >>> hi mark,
> > >>>
> > >>> I would like write some documentation on
> "How
> > to ... I18N" and Dan
> > >>> suggested me to do so in the ISIS wiki.
> > >>> While I am having an Apache account I do
> not
> > have any "edit"
> > >>> permissions. Can you give me these
> > permissions?
> > >>>
> > >>> thx,
> > >>> sabine
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Am 05.01.2011 08:44, schrieb Dan
> Haywood:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On 05/01/2011 07:17, Sabine Winkler
> > wrote:
> > >>>>> hi,
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> happy new year! I read your
> answer to
> > the "I18N" question and tried
> > >>>>> to get it run. nice feature! may
> I ask
> > some questions on this:
> > >>>>> 1) I would provide a short
> > documentation how to get this run - I
> > >>>>> could write it as a sub-site
> (like
> > "Security") at a "draft".
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Since this should be part of the
> official
> > documentation, it ought to
> > >>>> go into a DocBook. The one I think
> it
> > should live in is the "core"
> > >>>> docbook that I'm currently working on
> (in
> > >>>> core/src/docbkx/guide/isis-core.xml
> or
> > something like).
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Two options:
> > >>>> 1. edit this file then send me a
> patch
> > >>>> 2. write something up in the wiki,
> which
> > I'll then copy over to
> > >>>> isis-core.xml.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> I think that (2) is probably easier,
> and
> > more immediately valuable.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> 2) There was a small bug - the
> > "normal" way is to open a bug and
> > >>>>> report a fix in JIRA - correct?
> > >>>> Yes. And if you have a fix, then
> attach
> > the patch.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>> 3) @ISIS-69 - "Get rid of some
> (and
> > ideally all) of the
> > >>>>> FacetDecorators" - within the
> last
> > days I startet to get a deeper
> > >>>>> understanding of the facet
> decorators.
> > You gave me the hint to look
> > >>>>> at the TransactionXXX as an
> > example/template for the
> > >>>>> Test(Scenario)Reciever. As I
> > understand you right this should be
> > >>>>> better implemented with a
> FacetFactory
> > (e.q.
> > >>>>> NamedAnnotationFacetFactory and
> so
> > on). While I am not familiar with
> > >>>>> this - one stupid question - is
> there
> > any configuration how to
> > >>>>> "register" an new factory?
> > >>>> Yeah, I detailed how to register a
> new
> > factory in my reply on
> > >>>> isis-dev; use the facets.include
> > property.
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> >
> isis.reflector.facets.include=com.mycompany.MyNamedFacetFactory
> > >>>>
> > >>>> You could also exclude the original
> facet
> > factory using the
> > >>>> facets.exclude property:
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> >
> isis.reflector.facets.exclude=org.apache.isis.core.progmodel.facets.naming.named.NamedAnnotationFacetFactory
> >
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>> However, I think it probably isn't
> > necessary to do this as the custom
> > >>>> one explicitly included above will
> > overwrite any facets installed by
> > >>>> the default one.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Cheers
> > >>>> Dan
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> thanks,
> > >>>>> sabine
> > >>>>>
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
Re: i18n and implementation strategies
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
Hi Sabine, Sigi!
Sorry for not being that responsive last week, but we moved to a new flat...
Oki, back settled and equipped with internet again, I looked what I can do.
a) @Sabine: for getting you access to our wiki you need to file a iCLA [1] (for general info see [2]) This basically means that you have read the ALv2 and agree with it. Please especially read section 4 of the iCLA which makes sure that you have no company restriction from your employer which is possibly limiting your rights to contribute.
Print it, sign it and scan it back in. Then please send the signed iCLA to secretary@apache.org . Craig Russel or Sam Ruby will take care of it and once you show up on the committers page [3] we can give you access to our wiki.
Sorry for this process being so verbose, but you know. In days where Oracle sues Google and stuff happening ... ;)
b) Sigi, I've checked our cwiki and it seems that we don't have a isis-admin role yet. I think it would be the best thing to get you general confluence admin rights as well. Chattered about that on #asfinfra. I will send a quick mail to the IPMC asking for further clarification.
LieGrue,
strub
[1] http://www.apache.org/licenses/icla.txt
[2] http://www.apache.org/licenses
[3] http://people.apache.org/committer-index.html
--- On Fri, 1/21/11, Sabine Winkler <sw...@sabinewinkler.com> wrote:
> From: Sabine Winkler <sw...@sabinewinkler.com>
> Subject: Re: i18n and implementation strategies
> To: isis-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Friday, January 21, 2011, 9:25 AM
> hi siegfried,
>
> thanks a lot - seems to be a "vienna connection" :-)
>
> cheers,
> sabine
>
>
> Am 21.01.2011 09:42, schrieb Siegfried Goeschl:
> > Hi Sabine,
> >
> > sorry for dropping the ball - Mark will give you the
> edit rights today
> > (or make me to an Wiki administrator to help him) ...
> :-)
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Siegfried Goeschl
> >
> > On 1/14/11 2:39 PM, Sabine Winkler wrote:
> >> hi mark,
> >>
> >> I wrote this message last week and so I am trying
> again now ;-)
> >>
> >> thx for response,
> >> sabine
> >>
> >> Am 05.01.2011 10:07, schrieb Sabine Winkler:
> >>> hi mark,
> >>>
> >>> I would like write some documentation on "How
> to ... I18N" and Dan
> >>> suggested me to do so in the ISIS wiki.
> >>> While I am having an Apache account I do not
> have any "edit"
> >>> permissions. Can you give me these
> permissions?
> >>>
> >>> thx,
> >>> sabine
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Am 05.01.2011 08:44, schrieb Dan Haywood:
> >>>>
> >>>> On 05/01/2011 07:17, Sabine Winkler
> wrote:
> >>>>> hi,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> happy new year! I read your answer to
> the "I18N" question and tried
> >>>>> to get it run. nice feature! may I ask
> some questions on this:
> >>>>> 1) I would provide a short
> documentation how to get this run - I
> >>>>> could write it as a sub-site (like
> "Security") at a "draft".
> >>>>
> >>>> Since this should be part of the official
> documentation, it ought to
> >>>> go into a DocBook. The one I think it
> should live in is the "core"
> >>>> docbook that I'm currently working on (in
> >>>> core/src/docbkx/guide/isis-core.xml or
> something like).
> >>>>
> >>>> Two options:
> >>>> 1. edit this file then send me a patch
> >>>> 2. write something up in the wiki, which
> I'll then copy over to
> >>>> isis-core.xml.
> >>>>
> >>>> I think that (2) is probably easier, and
> more immediately valuable.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> 2) There was a small bug - the
> "normal" way is to open a bug and
> >>>>> report a fix in JIRA - correct?
> >>>> Yes. And if you have a fix, then attach
> the patch.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>> 3) @ISIS-69 - "Get rid of some (and
> ideally all) of the
> >>>>> FacetDecorators" - within the last
> days I startet to get a deeper
> >>>>> understanding of the facet decorators.
> You gave me the hint to look
> >>>>> at the TransactionXXX as an
> example/template for the
> >>>>> Test(Scenario)Reciever. As I
> understand you right this should be
> >>>>> better implemented with a FacetFactory
> (e.q.
> >>>>> NamedAnnotationFacetFactory and so
> on). While I am not familiar with
> >>>>> this - one stupid question - is there
> any configuration how to
> >>>>> "register" an new factory?
> >>>> Yeah, I detailed how to register a new
> factory in my reply on
> >>>> isis-dev; use the facets.include
> property.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> isis.reflector.facets.include=com.mycompany.MyNamedFacetFactory
> >>>>
> >>>> You could also exclude the original facet
> factory using the
> >>>> facets.exclude property:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> isis.reflector.facets.exclude=org.apache.isis.core.progmodel.facets.naming.named.NamedAnnotationFacetFactory
>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> However, I think it probably isn't
> necessary to do this as the custom
> >>>> one explicitly included above will
> overwrite any facets installed by
> >>>> the default one.
> >>>>
> >>>> Cheers
> >>>> Dan
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> thanks,
> >>>>> sabine
> >>>>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: i18n and implementation strategies
Posted by Sabine Winkler <sw...@sabinewinkler.com>.
hi siegfried,
thanks a lot - seems to be a "vienna connection" :-)
cheers,
sabine
Am 21.01.2011 09:42, schrieb Siegfried Goeschl:
> Hi Sabine,
>
> sorry for dropping the ball - Mark will give you the edit rights today
> (or make me to an Wiki administrator to help him) ... :-)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Siegfried Goeschl
>
> On 1/14/11 2:39 PM, Sabine Winkler wrote:
>> hi mark,
>>
>> I wrote this message last week and so I am trying again now ;-)
>>
>> thx for response,
>> sabine
>>
>> Am 05.01.2011 10:07, schrieb Sabine Winkler:
>>> hi mark,
>>>
>>> I would like write some documentation on "How to ... I18N" and Dan
>>> suggested me to do so in the ISIS wiki.
>>> While I am having an Apache account I do not have any "edit"
>>> permissions. Can you give me these permissions?
>>>
>>> thx,
>>> sabine
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 05.01.2011 08:44, schrieb Dan Haywood:
>>>>
>>>> On 05/01/2011 07:17, Sabine Winkler wrote:
>>>>> hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> happy new year! I read your answer to the "I18N" question and tried
>>>>> to get it run. nice feature! may I ask some questions on this:
>>>>> 1) I would provide a short documentation how to get this run - I
>>>>> could write it as a sub-site (like "Security") at a "draft".
>>>>
>>>> Since this should be part of the official documentation, it ought to
>>>> go into a DocBook. The one I think it should live in is the "core"
>>>> docbook that I'm currently working on (in
>>>> core/src/docbkx/guide/isis-core.xml or something like).
>>>>
>>>> Two options:
>>>> 1. edit this file then send me a patch
>>>> 2. write something up in the wiki, which I'll then copy over to
>>>> isis-core.xml.
>>>>
>>>> I think that (2) is probably easier, and more immediately valuable.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> 2) There was a small bug - the "normal" way is to open a bug and
>>>>> report a fix in JIRA - correct?
>>>> Yes. And if you have a fix, then attach the patch.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> 3) @ISIS-69 - "Get rid of some (and ideally all) of the
>>>>> FacetDecorators" - within the last days I startet to get a deeper
>>>>> understanding of the facet decorators. You gave me the hint to look
>>>>> at the TransactionXXX as an example/template for the
>>>>> Test(Scenario)Reciever. As I understand you right this should be
>>>>> better implemented with a FacetFactory (e.q.
>>>>> NamedAnnotationFacetFactory and so on). While I am not familiar with
>>>>> this - one stupid question - is there any configuration how to
>>>>> "register" an new factory?
>>>> Yeah, I detailed how to register a new factory in my reply on
>>>> isis-dev; use the facets.include property.
>>>>
>>>> isis.reflector.facets.include=com.mycompany.MyNamedFacetFactory
>>>>
>>>> You could also exclude the original facet factory using the
>>>> facets.exclude property:
>>>>
>>>> isis.reflector.facets.exclude=org.apache.isis.core.progmodel.facets.naming.named.NamedAnnotationFacetFactory
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> However, I think it probably isn't necessary to do this as the custom
>>>> one explicitly included above will overwrite any facets installed by
>>>> the default one.
>>>>
>>>> Cheers
>>>> Dan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> thanks,
>>>>> sabine
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
Re: i18n and implementation strategies
Posted by Siegfried Goeschl <sg...@gmx.at>.
Hi Sabine,
sorry for dropping the ball - Mark will give you the edit rights today
(or make me to an Wiki administrator to help him) ... :-)
Cheers,
Siegfried Goeschl
On 1/14/11 2:39 PM, Sabine Winkler wrote:
> hi mark,
>
> I wrote this message last week and so I am trying again now ;-)
>
> thx for response,
> sabine
>
> Am 05.01.2011 10:07, schrieb Sabine Winkler:
>> hi mark,
>>
>> I would like write some documentation on "How to ... I18N" and Dan
>> suggested me to do so in the ISIS wiki.
>> While I am having an Apache account I do not have any "edit"
>> permissions. Can you give me these permissions?
>>
>> thx,
>> sabine
>>
>>
>> Am 05.01.2011 08:44, schrieb Dan Haywood:
>>>
>>> On 05/01/2011 07:17, Sabine Winkler wrote:
>>>> hi,
>>>>
>>>> happy new year! I read your answer to the "I18N" question and tried
>>>> to get it run. nice feature! may I ask some questions on this:
>>>> 1) I would provide a short documentation how to get this run - I
>>>> could write it as a sub-site (like "Security") at a "draft".
>>>
>>> Since this should be part of the official documentation, it ought to
>>> go into a DocBook. The one I think it should live in is the "core"
>>> docbook that I'm currently working on (in
>>> core/src/docbkx/guide/isis-core.xml or something like).
>>>
>>> Two options:
>>> 1. edit this file then send me a patch
>>> 2. write something up in the wiki, which I'll then copy over to
>>> isis-core.xml.
>>>
>>> I think that (2) is probably easier, and more immediately valuable.
>>>
>>>
>>>> 2) There was a small bug - the "normal" way is to open a bug and
>>>> report a fix in JIRA - correct?
>>> Yes. And if you have a fix, then attach the patch.
>>>
>>>
>>>> 3) @ISIS-69 - "Get rid of some (and ideally all) of the
>>>> FacetDecorators" - within the last days I startet to get a deeper
>>>> understanding of the facet decorators. You gave me the hint to look
>>>> at the TransactionXXX as an example/template for the
>>>> Test(Scenario)Reciever. As I understand you right this should be
>>>> better implemented with a FacetFactory (e.q.
>>>> NamedAnnotationFacetFactory and so on). While I am not familiar with
>>>> this - one stupid question - is there any configuration how to
>>>> "register" an new factory?
>>> Yeah, I detailed how to register a new factory in my reply on
>>> isis-dev; use the facets.include property.
>>>
>>> isis.reflector.facets.include=com.mycompany.MyNamedFacetFactory
>>>
>>> You could also exclude the original facet factory using the
>>> facets.exclude property:
>>>
>>> isis.reflector.facets.exclude=org.apache.isis.core.progmodel.facets.naming.named.NamedAnnotationFacetFactory
>>>
>>>
>>> However, I think it probably isn't necessary to do this as the custom
>>> one explicitly included above will overwrite any facets installed by
>>> the default one.
>>>
>>> Cheers
>>> Dan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> thanks,
>>>> sabine
>>>>
>>
>>
>
>
Re: i18n and implementation strategies
Posted by Sabine Winkler <sw...@sabinewinkler.com>.
hi mark,
I wrote this message last week and so I am trying again now ;-)
thx for response,
sabine
Am 05.01.2011 10:07, schrieb Sabine Winkler:
> hi mark,
>
> I would like write some documentation on "How to ... I18N" and Dan
> suggested me to do so in the ISIS wiki.
> While I am having an Apache account I do not have any "edit"
> permissions. Can you give me these permissions?
>
> thx,
> sabine
>
>
> Am 05.01.2011 08:44, schrieb Dan Haywood:
>>
>> On 05/01/2011 07:17, Sabine Winkler wrote:
>>> hi,
>>>
>>> happy new year! I read your answer to the "I18N" question and tried
>>> to get it run. nice feature! may I ask some questions on this:
>>> 1) I would provide a short documentation how to get this run - I
>>> could write it as a sub-site (like "Security") at a "draft".
>>
>> Since this should be part of the official documentation, it ought to
>> go into a DocBook. The one I think it should live in is the "core"
>> docbook that I'm currently working on (in
>> core/src/docbkx/guide/isis-core.xml or something like).
>>
>> Two options:
>> 1. edit this file then send me a patch
>> 2. write something up in the wiki, which I'll then copy over to
>> isis-core.xml.
>>
>> I think that (2) is probably easier, and more immediately valuable.
>>
>>
>>> 2) There was a small bug - the "normal" way is to open a bug and
>>> report a fix in JIRA - correct?
>> Yes. And if you have a fix, then attach the patch.
>>
>>
>>> 3) @ISIS-69 - "Get rid of some (and ideally all) of the
>>> FacetDecorators" - within the last days I startet to get a deeper
>>> understanding of the facet decorators. You gave me the hint to look
>>> at the TransactionXXX as an example/template for the
>>> Test(Scenario)Reciever. As I understand you right this should be
>>> better implemented with a FacetFactory (e.q.
>>> NamedAnnotationFacetFactory and so on). While I am not familiar with
>>> this - one stupid question - is there any configuration how to
>>> "register" an new factory?
>> Yeah, I detailed how to register a new factory in my reply on
>> isis-dev; use the facets.include property.
>>
>> isis.reflector.facets.include=com.mycompany.MyNamedFacetFactory
>>
>> You could also exclude the original facet factory using the
>> facets.exclude property:
>>
>> isis.reflector.facets.exclude=org.apache.isis.core.progmodel.facets.naming.named.NamedAnnotationFacetFactory
>>
>>
>> However, I think it probably isn't necessary to do this as the custom
>> one explicitly included above will overwrite any facets installed by
>> the default one.
>>
>> Cheers
>> Dan
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>>
>>>
>>> thanks,
>>> sabine
>>>
>
>
Re: i18n and implementation strategies
Posted by Sabine Winkler <sw...@sabinewinkler.com>.
hi mark,
I would like write some documentation on "How to ... I18N" and Dan
suggested me to do so in the ISIS wiki.
While I am having an Apache account I do not have any "edit"
permissions. Can you give me these permissions?
thx,
sabine
Am 05.01.2011 08:44, schrieb Dan Haywood:
>
> On 05/01/2011 07:17, Sabine Winkler wrote:
>> hi,
>>
>> happy new year! I read your answer to the "I18N" question and tried
>> to get it run. nice feature! may I ask some questions on this:
>> 1) I would provide a short documentation how to get this run - I
>> could write it as a sub-site (like "Security") at a "draft".
>
> Since this should be part of the official documentation, it ought to
> go into a DocBook. The one I think it should live in is the "core"
> docbook that I'm currently working on (in
> core/src/docbkx/guide/isis-core.xml or something like).
>
> Two options:
> 1. edit this file then send me a patch
> 2. write something up in the wiki, which I'll then copy over to
> isis-core.xml.
>
> I think that (2) is probably easier, and more immediately valuable.
>
>
>> 2) There was a small bug - the "normal" way is to open a bug and
>> report a fix in JIRA - correct?
> Yes. And if you have a fix, then attach the patch.
>
>
>> 3) @ISIS-69 - "Get rid of some (and ideally all) of the
>> FacetDecorators" - within the last days I startet to get a deeper
>> understanding of the facet decorators. You gave me the hint to look
>> at the TransactionXXX as an example/template for the
>> Test(Scenario)Reciever. As I understand you right this should be
>> better implemented with a FacetFactory (e.q.
>> NamedAnnotationFacetFactory and so on). While I am not familiar with
>> this - one stupid question - is there any configuration how to
>> "register" an new factory?
> Yeah, I detailed how to register a new factory in my reply on
> isis-dev; use the facets.include property.
>
> isis.reflector.facets.include=com.mycompany.MyNamedFacetFactory
>
> You could also exclude the original facet factory using the
> facets.exclude property:
>
> isis.reflector.facets.exclude=org.apache.isis.core.progmodel.facets.naming.named.NamedAnnotationFacetFactory
>
>
> However, I think it probably isn't necessary to do this as the custom
> one explicitly included above will overwrite any facets installed by
> the default one.
>
> Cheers
> Dan
>
>
>
>
>>
>>
>> thanks,
>> sabine
>>