You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to axkit-dev@xml.apache.org by Matt Sergeant <ma...@sergeant.org> on 2005/04/26 20:59:38 UTC
Migrating to SVN
Proposal: After we release 1.6.3, we migrate to subversion.
Apparently it's a very simple process, and I've used svn on a couple of
projects now and I'm happy with its stability and performance.
Votes please!
+1
Re: Migrating to SVN
Posted by Robin Berjon <ro...@expway.fr>.
Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Proposal: After we release 1.6.3, we migrate to subversion.
>
> Apparently it's a very simple process, and I've used svn on a couple of
> projects now and I'm happy with its stability and performance.
>
> Votes please!
+1
/me also needs to recall how to ssh there.
--
Robin Berjon
Research Scientist
Expway, http://expway.com/
Re: Migrating to SVN
Posted by Dirk-Willem van Gulik <di...@webweaving.org>.
On Wed, 27 Apr 2005, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Yes, the ASF has asked us to make this move at some point also.
For the record - note that we -asked-; nothing more; nothing less. If this
community feels it is more productive on CVS that is fine too.
However we ultimately will more and more tie in SVN with things like
Certificates, CLA's, release tracking and other automated papertrail
elements. Which allows us, as the foundation, to better protect the IP and
iwth that the Community in this increasingly 'lega triggerhappyl' world.
And ultimately every exception becomes a liability in that prcedural
view.
However this is a proces of years - and at this point there is no great
urgency. Esp. as there are enough voluteers within the CVS using pmc's to
keep it alive.
Dw.
Re: Migrating to SVN
Posted by Tom Schindl <to...@gmx.at>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
well I'm using Trac in at the moment at its really nice but it has in my
idea one really big disadvantage which is its privileges system. What do
I mean? You cannot give users the e.g. anonymous ones the possibility to
report and edit a bug/feature request, but avoid anonymous in the same
time to change the status of a bug. Misuse like we have seen on the wiki
~ will follow. Besides this issue I like trac. JIRA has one more
advantage as I can see from now in the idea that it links cvs/subversion
commit to a issue, trac does it the other way round.
One more disadvantage of trac is that if you have multiple different
projects in one svn-repository you cannot configure trac only to show
project1 or project2.
I like trac and before using any other bugtracking I'd go with it but
one day I'll write my own ;-)
Tom
Matt Sergeant schrieb:
| On 27 Apr 2005, at 10:30, Tom Schindl wrote:
|
|> Now there would be a perfect point to move AxKit into such a Bug/Feature
|> tracking system. Bugs could be scheduled, ... .
|
|
| I've talked to Dirk about the possibility of us using Trac, which seems
| to integrate lots of project management features very nicely. We'd
| probably have to get that setup ourselves, but it looks pretty easy to do.
|
| Matt.
|
|
| ______________________________________________________________________
| This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
| For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
| ______________________________________________________________________
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCcH9IkVPeOFLgZFIRApQ2AJ9R53AXy3miclKxouOYzcVo9A4UmgCeI1cQ
37OEInuZvoZ9khdujC/OR9g=
=i3VF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Migrating to SVN
Posted by Matt Sergeant <ma...@sergeant.org>.
On 27 Apr 2005, at 10:30, Tom Schindl wrote:
> Now there would be a perfect point to move AxKit into such a
> Bug/Feature
> tracking system. Bugs could be scheduled, ... .
I've talked to Dirk about the possibility of us using Trac, which seems
to integrate lots of project management features very nicely. We'd
probably have to get that setup ourselves, but it looks pretty easy to
do.
Matt.
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the MessageLabs Email Security System.
For more information please visit http://www.messagelabs.com/email
______________________________________________________________________
Re: Migrating to SVN
Posted by Tom Schindl <to...@gmx.at>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Matt Sergeant schrieb:
| On 27 Apr 2005, at 02:06, Tom Schindl wrote:
|
|> Although I can not vote I would second this. I would also suggest to
|> register for the issue/bug tracking one of the apache possibilities JIRA
|> looks really cool although written in java. I haven't looked at scarab
|> until now but could take a look. Bugzilla would be the least one. I
|> think at the moment bugs are tracked rt.cpan.org.
|
|
| Yes, the ASF has asked us to make this move at some point also.
|
|
Now there would be a perfect point to move AxKit into such a Bug/Feature
tracking system. Bugs could be scheduled, ... .
Tom
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCb6HskVPeOFLgZFIRArB6AKCcZ9ZoL5QuoMdiEKNKEQuDJqopBACbBcW+
y0/2FUoYKyT5XUOQ5Njnupw=
=lx5n
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Migrating to SVN
Posted by Matt Sergeant <ma...@sergeant.org>.
On 27 Apr 2005, at 02:06, Tom Schindl wrote:
> Although I can not vote I would second this. I would also suggest to
> register for the issue/bug tracking one of the apache possibilities
> JIRA
> looks really cool although written in java. I haven't looked at scarab
> until now but could take a look. Bugzilla would be the least one. I
> think at the moment bugs are tracked rt.cpan.org.
Yes, the ASF has asked us to make this move at some point also.
Re: Migrating to SVN
Posted by Tom Schindl <to...@gmx.at>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Although I can not vote I would second this. I would also suggest to
register for the issue/bug tracking one of the apache possibilities JIRA
looks really cool although written in java. I haven't looked at scarab
until now but could take a look. Bugzilla would be the least one. I
think at the moment bugs are tracked rt.cpan.org.
Any comments would be great.
Tom
Michael Nachbaur schrieb:
| On Apr 26, 2005, at 11:59 AM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
|
|> Proposal: After we release 1.6.3, we migrate to subversion.
|>
|> Apparently it's a very simple process, and I've used svn on a couple
|> of projects now and I'm happy with its stability and performance.
|>
|> Votes please!
|
|
| +1
|
| --
| Michael Nachbaur <mi...@nachbaur.com>
| http://nachbaur.com/pgpkey.asc
|
|
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFCbyv+kVPeOFLgZFIRAnatAJ9jXuSWUH/CpP2TW3Dy2JZtT9lIYACggrn0
32GCkgKnocFXmnBNK401Cnk=
=3ZmO
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Migrating to SVN
Posted by Michael Nachbaur <mi...@nachbaur.com>.
On Apr 26, 2005, at 11:59 AM, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> Proposal: After we release 1.6.3, we migrate to subversion.
>
> Apparently it's a very simple process, and I've used svn on a couple
> of projects now and I'm happy with its stability and performance.
>
> Votes please!
+1
--
Michael Nachbaur <mi...@nachbaur.com>
http://nachbaur.com/pgpkey.asc