You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@ignite.apache.org by "Alexey Scherbakov (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2021/08/10 10:15:00 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (IGNITE-15280) Git rid of sequential reads in raft group

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15280?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Alexey Scherbakov updated IGNITE-15280:
---------------------------------------
    Description: 
Due to some legacy issues all reads are implemented using [1] callback, efficiently making it sequential.

If a lease-based read (having lowest latency) model is used this is pointless, even for a readindex method reads can be concurrent.

We should refactor org.apache.ignite.internal.table.distributed.raft.PartitionListener#onRead for allowing concurrent batched reads.

Another task is to switch to lease reads as a default method.

[1] org.apache.ignite.internal.table.distributed.raft.PartitionListener#onRead

  was:
Due to some legacy issues all reads are implemented using [1] callback,

efficiently making it sequential.

If a lease-based read (having lowest latency) model is used this is pointless, even for a readindex method reads can be concurrent.

We should refactor org.apache.ignite.internal.table.distributed.raft.PartitionListener#onRead for allowing concurrent batched reads.

Another task is to switch to lease reads as a default method.

[1] org.apache.ignite.internal.table.distributed.raft.PartitionListener#onRead


> Git rid of sequential reads in raft group
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IGNITE-15280
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IGNITE-15280
>             Project: Ignite
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>    Affects Versions: 3.0.0-alpha2
>            Reporter: Alexey Scherbakov
>            Priority: Major
>
> Due to some legacy issues all reads are implemented using [1] callback, efficiently making it sequential.
> If a lease-based read (having lowest latency) model is used this is pointless, even for a readindex method reads can be concurrent.
> We should refactor org.apache.ignite.internal.table.distributed.raft.PartitionListener#onRead for allowing concurrent batched reads.
> Another task is to switch to lease reads as a default method.
> [1] org.apache.ignite.internal.table.distributed.raft.PartitionListener#onRead



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.3.4#803005)