You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@clerezza.apache.org by Henry Story <he...@bblfish.net> on 2010/09/28 16:33:27 UTC
adding keygenapp to Clerezza?
Hi,
I have a final 0.5 version of the keygen module at
http://github.com/bblfish/keygenapp
(There is a piece related to Xwiki in there that is not relevant to this discussion)
We could publish it back to http://sommer.dev.java.net/ and from there onto
the Maven central repository. But I am just no longer sure about what is going on
at dev.java.net. As I am now commiter at Clerezza I could also just move that
piece onto Clerezza, as it is made up of BSD licences from Manchester and from me.
Then I think it will more easily get into the maven repository....
Is there an issue with this? This would allow Clerezza to have finally a working foaf+ssl implementation, as it has been waiting for this release for some time.
Otherwise I can push this to sommer.dev.java.net and from there onto Maven.
Henry
Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/
Re: adding keygenapp to Clerezza?
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
Hi Henry,
2010/9/29 Henry Story <he...@bblfish.net>
>
>
> It's now added to Clerezza. I opened and fixed the
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA-310
>
> If that's ok, then I'll refactor the other pieces in the code
> and add issue CLEREZZA-243 code back into the main trunk.
>
> I have a few smaller fixes I added to the code in various place that
> I'll then check in too.
>
>
+1, I think you can go further with it.
Tommaso
Re: adding keygenapp to Clerezza?
Posted by Henry Story <he...@bblfish.net>.
On 29 Sep 2010, at 19:57, Henry Story wrote:
> I have changed the paths and updated github
> http://github.com/bblfish/keygenapp
>
> So that it's ready to be added to Clerezza. I'll try and see if I can do that now...
It's now added to Clerezza. I opened and fixed the
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLEREZZA-310
If that's ok, then I'll refactor the other pieces in the code
and add issue CLEREZZA-243 code back into the main trunk.
I have a few smaller fixes I added to the code in various place that
I'll then check in too.
> Henry
>
> On 29 Sep 2010, at 10:17, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
>
>> Hi all,
>> I am +1 for including it if our concern is having it inside Clerezza, not
>> just having it released.
>> I think it would fit well in Clerezza, maybe as a separate Maven project in
>> trunk (not org.apache.clerezza.parent module).
>> By the way, I think that, in an hopefully near future, we could have better
>> design refactoring modules' organization inside org.apache.clerezza.parent.
>> Cheers,
>> Tommaso
>>
>>
>>
>> 2010/9/29 Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <re...@trialox.org>
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> according to http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html we can include BSD
>>> icensed code in both source and binary form, so there's no legal problem to
>>> cpying the stuff over. I think having it integrated gives as the greates
>>> flexibility, but as I think this module doesn't directly deal with rdf its
>>> also easy to have at a separate utility.
>>>
>>> Ceers,
>>> reto
>>>
>>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net
>>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I have a final 0.5 version of the keygen module at
>>>>
>>>> http://github.com/bblfish/keygenapp
>>>>
>>>> (There is a piece related to Xwiki in there that is not relevant to this
>>>> discussion)
>>>>
>>>> We could publish it back to http://sommer.dev.java.net/ and from there
>>>> onto
>>>> the Maven central repository. But I am just no longer sure about what is
>>>> going on
>>>> at dev.java.net. As I am now commiter at Clerezza I could also just move
>>>> that
>>>> piece onto Clerezza, as it is made up of BSD licences from Manchester and
>>>> from me.
>>>>
>>>> Then I think it will more easily get into the maven repository....
>>>> Is there an issue with this? This would allow Clerezza to have finally a
>>>> working foaf+ssl implementation, as it has been waiting for this release
>>> for
>>>> some time.
>>>>
>>>> Otherwise I can push this to sommer.dev.java.net and from there onto
>>>> Maven.
>>>>
>>>> Henry
>>>>
>>>> Social Web Architect
>>>> http://bblfish.net/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
>
Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/
Re: adding keygenapp to Clerezza?
Posted by Henry Story <he...@bblfish.net>.
I have changed the paths and updated github
http://github.com/bblfish/keygenapp
So that it's ready to be added to Clerezza. I'll try and see if I can do that now...
Henry
On 29 Sep 2010, at 10:17, Tommaso Teofili wrote:
> Hi all,
> I am +1 for including it if our concern is having it inside Clerezza, not
> just having it released.
> I think it would fit well in Clerezza, maybe as a separate Maven project in
> trunk (not org.apache.clerezza.parent module).
> By the way, I think that, in an hopefully near future, we could have better
> design refactoring modules' organization inside org.apache.clerezza.parent.
> Cheers,
> Tommaso
>
>
>
> 2010/9/29 Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <re...@trialox.org>
>
>> Hi
>>
>> according to http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html we can include BSD
>> icensed code in both source and binary form, so there's no legal problem to
>> cpying the stuff over. I think having it integrated gives as the greates
>> flexibility, but as I think this module doesn't directly deal with rdf its
>> also easy to have at a separate utility.
>>
>> Ceers,
>> reto
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net
>>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I have a final 0.5 version of the keygen module at
>>>
>>> http://github.com/bblfish/keygenapp
>>>
>>> (There is a piece related to Xwiki in there that is not relevant to this
>>> discussion)
>>>
>>> We could publish it back to http://sommer.dev.java.net/ and from there
>>> onto
>>> the Maven central repository. But I am just no longer sure about what is
>>> going on
>>> at dev.java.net. As I am now commiter at Clerezza I could also just move
>>> that
>>> piece onto Clerezza, as it is made up of BSD licences from Manchester and
>>> from me.
>>>
>>> Then I think it will more easily get into the maven repository....
>>> Is there an issue with this? This would allow Clerezza to have finally a
>>> working foaf+ssl implementation, as it has been waiting for this release
>> for
>>> some time.
>>>
>>> Otherwise I can push this to sommer.dev.java.net and from there onto
>>> Maven.
>>>
>>> Henry
>>>
>>> Social Web Architect
>>> http://bblfish.net/
>>>
>>>
>>
Social Web Architect
http://bblfish.net/
Re: adding keygenapp to Clerezza?
Posted by Tommaso Teofili <to...@gmail.com>.
Hi all,
I am +1 for including it if our concern is having it inside Clerezza, not
just having it released.
I think it would fit well in Clerezza, maybe as a separate Maven project in
trunk (not org.apache.clerezza.parent module).
By the way, I think that, in an hopefully near future, we could have better
design refactoring modules' organization inside org.apache.clerezza.parent.
Cheers,
Tommaso
2010/9/29 Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <re...@trialox.org>
> Hi
>
> according to http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html we can include BSD
> icensed code in both source and binary form, so there's no legal problem to
> cpying the stuff over. I think having it integrated gives as the greates
> flexibility, but as I think this module doesn't directly deal with rdf its
> also easy to have at a separate utility.
>
> Ceers,
> reto
>
> On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Henry Story <henry.story@bblfish.net
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > I have a final 0.5 version of the keygen module at
> >
> > http://github.com/bblfish/keygenapp
> >
> > (There is a piece related to Xwiki in there that is not relevant to this
> > discussion)
> >
> > We could publish it back to http://sommer.dev.java.net/ and from there
> > onto
> > the Maven central repository. But I am just no longer sure about what is
> > going on
> > at dev.java.net. As I am now commiter at Clerezza I could also just move
> > that
> > piece onto Clerezza, as it is made up of BSD licences from Manchester and
> > from me.
> >
> > Then I think it will more easily get into the maven repository....
> > Is there an issue with this? This would allow Clerezza to have finally a
> > working foaf+ssl implementation, as it has been waiting for this release
> for
> > some time.
> >
> > Otherwise I can push this to sommer.dev.java.net and from there onto
> > Maven.
> >
> > Henry
> >
> > Social Web Architect
> > http://bblfish.net/
> >
> >
>
Re: adding keygenapp to Clerezza?
Posted by Reto Bachmann-Gmuer <re...@trialox.org>.
Hi
according to http://www.apache.org/legal/3party.html we can include BSD
icensed code in both source and binary form, so there's no legal problem to
cpying the stuff over. I think having it integrated gives as the greates
flexibility, but as I think this module doesn't directly deal with rdf its
also easy to have at a separate utility.
Ceers,
reto
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Henry Story <he...@bblfish.net>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have a final 0.5 version of the keygen module at
>
> http://github.com/bblfish/keygenapp
>
> (There is a piece related to Xwiki in there that is not relevant to this
> discussion)
>
> We could publish it back to http://sommer.dev.java.net/ and from there
> onto
> the Maven central repository. But I am just no longer sure about what is
> going on
> at dev.java.net. As I am now commiter at Clerezza I could also just move
> that
> piece onto Clerezza, as it is made up of BSD licences from Manchester and
> from me.
>
> Then I think it will more easily get into the maven repository....
> Is there an issue with this? This would allow Clerezza to have finally a
> working foaf+ssl implementation, as it has been waiting for this release for
> some time.
>
> Otherwise I can push this to sommer.dev.java.net and from there onto
> Maven.
>
> Henry
>
> Social Web Architect
> http://bblfish.net/
>
>