You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@parquet.apache.org by Micah Kornfield <em...@gmail.com> on 2025/12/16 07:14:21 UTC
[VOTE] Clarify versioning in parquet-format
I'm starting a vote to finalize some ambiguities around current versioning
as documented in https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/535
The changes have been discussed on the mailing list [1] and there have been
several reviewers on the PR.
A TL;DR;
1. Readers should treat the values 1 and 2 as identical in the version
field in the parquet footer.
2. Encodings can be used with any page type.
3. Data page header V2 is supported by most implementations, but not
necessarily recommended as a default.
The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
Votes:
[ ] +1 Accept the changes
[ ] +0
[ ] -1 Do accept these changes because ...
Thanks,
Micah
[1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/0bdyyb7qobrxx94x8v7t5z7g2ksnpyr2
[2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/535
Re: [VOTE] Clarify versioning in parquet-format
Posted by Russell Spitzer <ru...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 9:55 AM Matt Topol <zo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025, 10:53 AM Gang Wu <us...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (binding)
> >
> > Best,
> > Gang
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 11:49 PM Micah Kornfield <em...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Just wanted to bump this vote thread.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Micah
> > >
> > > On Monday, December 15, 2025, Micah Kornfield <em...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm starting a vote to finalize some ambiguities around current
> > > > versioning as documented in https://github.com/apache/
> > > > parquet-format/pull/535
> > > >
> > > > The changes have been discussed on the mailing list [1] and there
> have
> > > > been several reviewers on the PR.
> > > >
> > > > A TL;DR;
> > > > 1. Readers should treat the values 1 and 2 as identical in the
> version
> > > > field in the parquet footer.
> > > > 2. Encodings can be used with any page type.
> > > > 3. Data page header V2 is supported by most implementations, but not
> > > > necessarily recommended as a default.
> > > >
> > > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >
> > > > Votes:
> > > >
> > > > [ ] +1 Accept the changes
> > > > [ ] +0
> > > > [ ] -1 Do accept these changes because ...
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Micah
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/0bdyyb7qobrxx94x8v7t5z7g2ksnpyr2
> > > > [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/535
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Clarify versioning in parquet-format
Posted by Matt Topol <zo...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
On Thu, Dec 18, 2025, 10:53 AM Gang Wu <us...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> Best,
> Gang
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 11:49 PM Micah Kornfield <em...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Just wanted to bump this vote thread.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Micah
> >
> > On Monday, December 15, 2025, Micah Kornfield <em...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > I'm starting a vote to finalize some ambiguities around current
> > > versioning as documented in https://github.com/apache/
> > > parquet-format/pull/535
> > >
> > > The changes have been discussed on the mailing list [1] and there have
> > > been several reviewers on the PR.
> > >
> > > A TL;DR;
> > > 1. Readers should treat the values 1 and 2 as identical in the version
> > > field in the parquet footer.
> > > 2. Encodings can be used with any page type.
> > > 3. Data page header V2 is supported by most implementations, but not
> > > necessarily recommended as a default.
> > >
> > > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> > >
> > > Votes:
> > >
> > > [ ] +1 Accept the changes
> > > [ ] +0
> > > [ ] -1 Do accept these changes because ...
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Micah
> > >
> > > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/0bdyyb7qobrxx94x8v7t5z7g2ksnpyr2
> > > [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/535
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Clarify versioning in parquet-format
Posted by Gang Wu <us...@gmail.com>.
+1 (binding)
Best,
Gang
On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 11:49 PM Micah Kornfield <em...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Just wanted to bump this vote thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Micah
>
> On Monday, December 15, 2025, Micah Kornfield <em...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > I'm starting a vote to finalize some ambiguities around current
> > versioning as documented in https://github.com/apache/
> > parquet-format/pull/535
> >
> > The changes have been discussed on the mailing list [1] and there have
> > been several reviewers on the PR.
> >
> > A TL;DR;
> > 1. Readers should treat the values 1 and 2 as identical in the version
> > field in the parquet footer.
> > 2. Encodings can be used with any page type.
> > 3. Data page header V2 is supported by most implementations, but not
> > necessarily recommended as a default.
> >
> > The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> >
> > Votes:
> >
> > [ ] +1 Accept the changes
> > [ ] +0
> > [ ] -1 Do accept these changes because ...
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Micah
> >
> > [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/0bdyyb7qobrxx94x8v7t5z7g2ksnpyr2
> > [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/535
> >
>
[RESULT] Clarify versioning in parquet-format
Posted by Micah Kornfield <em...@gmail.com>.
The vote passes:
4 +1 binding votes (Gang, Antoine, Nong, Micah)
4 +1 non-binding votes.
No -1 or +0 votes.
Thank you everyone, I'll merge the PR.
Cheers,
Micah
On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 9:44 PM Nong Li <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 5:08 PM Andrew Lamb <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thank you Micah for driving this
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 1:44 PM Aihua Xu <ai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Dec 18, 2025, at 9:42 AM, Antoine Pitrou <an...@python.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding).
> > > >
> > > > (sorry for overlooking this!)
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Antoine.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> Le 18/12/2025 à 16:48, Micah Kornfield a écrit :
> > > >> Just wanted to bump this vote thread.
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Micah
> > > >>> On Monday, December 15, 2025, Micah Kornfield <
> emkornfield@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > >>> I'm starting a vote to finalize some ambiguities around current
> > > >>> versioning as documented in https://github.com/apache/
> > > >>> parquet-format/pull/535
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The changes have been discussed on the mailing list [1] and there
> > have
> > > >>> been several reviewers on the PR.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> A TL;DR;
> > > >>> 1. Readers should treat the values 1 and 2 as identical in the
> > version
> > > >>> field in the parquet footer.
> > > >>> 2. Encodings can be used with any page type.
> > > >>> 3. Data page header V2 is supported by most implementations, but
> not
> > > >>> necessarily recommended as a default.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Votes:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [ ] +1 Accept the changes
> > > >>> [ ] +0
> > > >>> [ ] -1 Do accept these changes because ...
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>> Micah
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/0bdyyb7qobrxx94x8v7t5z7g2ksnpyr2
> > > >>> [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/535
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
[RESULT] Clarify versioning in parquet-format
Posted by Micah Kornfield <em...@gmail.com>.
The vote passes:
4 +1 binding votes (Gang, Antoine, Nong, Micah)
4 +1 non-binding votes.
No -1 or +0 votes.
Thank you everyone, I'll merge the PR.
Cheers,
Micah
On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 9:44 PM Nong Li <no...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 5:08 PM Andrew Lamb <an...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> > Thank you Micah for driving this
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 1:44 PM Aihua Xu <ai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > +1 (non-binding)
> > >
> > >
> > > > On Dec 18, 2025, at 9:42 AM, Antoine Pitrou <an...@python.org>
> > wrote:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > +1 (binding).
> > > >
> > > > (sorry for overlooking this!)
> > > >
> > > > Regards
> > > >
> > > > Antoine.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >> Le 18/12/2025 à 16:48, Micah Kornfield a écrit :
> > > >> Just wanted to bump this vote thread.
> > > >> Thanks,
> > > >> Micah
> > > >>> On Monday, December 15, 2025, Micah Kornfield <
> emkornfield@gmail.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
> > > >>> I'm starting a vote to finalize some ambiguities around current
> > > >>> versioning as documented in https://github.com/apache/
> > > >>> parquet-format/pull/535
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The changes have been discussed on the mailing list [1] and there
> > have
> > > >>> been several reviewers on the PR.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> A TL;DR;
> > > >>> 1. Readers should treat the values 1 and 2 as identical in the
> > version
> > > >>> field in the parquet footer.
> > > >>> 2. Encodings can be used with any page type.
> > > >>> 3. Data page header V2 is supported by most implementations, but
> not
> > > >>> necessarily recommended as a default.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Votes:
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [ ] +1 Accept the changes
> > > >>> [ ] +0
> > > >>> [ ] -1 Do accept these changes because ...
> > > >>>
> > > >>> Thanks,
> > > >>> Micah
> > > >>>
> > > >>> [1]
> https://lists.apache.org/thread/0bdyyb7qobrxx94x8v7t5z7g2ksnpyr2
> > > >>> [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/535
> > > >>>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Clarify versioning in parquet-format
Posted by Nong Li <no...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 5:08 PM Andrew Lamb <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thank you Micah for driving this
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 1:44 PM Aihua Xu <ai...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> > > On Dec 18, 2025, at 9:42 AM, Antoine Pitrou <an...@python.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > +1 (binding).
> > >
> > > (sorry for overlooking this!)
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Antoine.
> > >
> > >
> > >> Le 18/12/2025 à 16:48, Micah Kornfield a écrit :
> > >> Just wanted to bump this vote thread.
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Micah
> > >>> On Monday, December 15, 2025, Micah Kornfield <emkornfield@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > >>> I'm starting a vote to finalize some ambiguities around current
> > >>> versioning as documented in https://github.com/apache/
> > >>> parquet-format/pull/535
> > >>>
> > >>> The changes have been discussed on the mailing list [1] and there
> have
> > >>> been several reviewers on the PR.
> > >>>
> > >>> A TL;DR;
> > >>> 1. Readers should treat the values 1 and 2 as identical in the
> version
> > >>> field in the parquet footer.
> > >>> 2. Encodings can be used with any page type.
> > >>> 3. Data page header V2 is supported by most implementations, but not
> > >>> necessarily recommended as a default.
> > >>>
> > >>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> > >>>
> > >>> Votes:
> > >>>
> > >>> [ ] +1 Accept the changes
> > >>> [ ] +0
> > >>> [ ] -1 Do accept these changes because ...
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Micah
> > >>>
> > >>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/0bdyyb7qobrxx94x8v7t5z7g2ksnpyr2
> > >>> [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/535
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Clarify versioning in parquet-format
Posted by Nong Li <no...@gmail.com>.
+1
On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 5:08 PM Andrew Lamb <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
> Thank you Micah for driving this
>
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 1:44 PM Aihua Xu <ai...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > +1 (non-binding)
> >
> >
> > > On Dec 18, 2025, at 9:42 AM, Antoine Pitrou <an...@python.org>
> wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > +1 (binding).
> > >
> > > (sorry for overlooking this!)
> > >
> > > Regards
> > >
> > > Antoine.
> > >
> > >
> > >> Le 18/12/2025 à 16:48, Micah Kornfield a écrit :
> > >> Just wanted to bump this vote thread.
> > >> Thanks,
> > >> Micah
> > >>> On Monday, December 15, 2025, Micah Kornfield <emkornfield@gmail.com
> >
> > wrote:
> > >>> I'm starting a vote to finalize some ambiguities around current
> > >>> versioning as documented in https://github.com/apache/
> > >>> parquet-format/pull/535
> > >>>
> > >>> The changes have been discussed on the mailing list [1] and there
> have
> > >>> been several reviewers on the PR.
> > >>>
> > >>> A TL;DR;
> > >>> 1. Readers should treat the values 1 and 2 as identical in the
> version
> > >>> field in the parquet footer.
> > >>> 2. Encodings can be used with any page type.
> > >>> 3. Data page header V2 is supported by most implementations, but not
> > >>> necessarily recommended as a default.
> > >>>
> > >>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> > >>>
> > >>> Votes:
> > >>>
> > >>> [ ] +1 Accept the changes
> > >>> [ ] +0
> > >>> [ ] -1 Do accept these changes because ...
> > >>>
> > >>> Thanks,
> > >>> Micah
> > >>>
> > >>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/0bdyyb7qobrxx94x8v7t5z7g2ksnpyr2
> > >>> [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/535
> > >>>
> > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Clarify versioning in parquet-format
Posted by Andrew Lamb <an...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
Thank you Micah for driving this
On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 1:44 PM Aihua Xu <ai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> > On Dec 18, 2025, at 9:42 AM, Antoine Pitrou <an...@python.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > +1 (binding).
> >
> > (sorry for overlooking this!)
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Antoine.
> >
> >
> >> Le 18/12/2025 à 16:48, Micah Kornfield a écrit :
> >> Just wanted to bump this vote thread.
> >> Thanks,
> >> Micah
> >>> On Monday, December 15, 2025, Micah Kornfield <em...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> I'm starting a vote to finalize some ambiguities around current
> >>> versioning as documented in https://github.com/apache/
> >>> parquet-format/pull/535
> >>>
> >>> The changes have been discussed on the mailing list [1] and there have
> >>> been several reviewers on the PR.
> >>>
> >>> A TL;DR;
> >>> 1. Readers should treat the values 1 and 2 as identical in the version
> >>> field in the parquet footer.
> >>> 2. Encodings can be used with any page type.
> >>> 3. Data page header V2 is supported by most implementations, but not
> >>> necessarily recommended as a default.
> >>>
> >>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Votes:
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Accept the changes
> >>> [ ] +0
> >>> [ ] -1 Do accept these changes because ...
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Micah
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/0bdyyb7qobrxx94x8v7t5z7g2ksnpyr2
> >>> [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/535
> >>>
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Clarify versioning in parquet-format
Posted by Andrew Lamb <an...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
Thank you Micah for driving this
On Thu, Dec 18, 2025 at 1:44 PM Aihua Xu <ai...@gmail.com> wrote:
> +1 (non-binding)
>
>
> > On Dec 18, 2025, at 9:42 AM, Antoine Pitrou <an...@python.org> wrote:
> >
> >
> > +1 (binding).
> >
> > (sorry for overlooking this!)
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Antoine.
> >
> >
> >> Le 18/12/2025 à 16:48, Micah Kornfield a écrit :
> >> Just wanted to bump this vote thread.
> >> Thanks,
> >> Micah
> >>> On Monday, December 15, 2025, Micah Kornfield <em...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>> I'm starting a vote to finalize some ambiguities around current
> >>> versioning as documented in https://github.com/apache/
> >>> parquet-format/pull/535
> >>>
> >>> The changes have been discussed on the mailing list [1] and there have
> >>> been several reviewers on the PR.
> >>>
> >>> A TL;DR;
> >>> 1. Readers should treat the values 1 and 2 as identical in the version
> >>> field in the parquet footer.
> >>> 2. Encodings can be used with any page type.
> >>> 3. Data page header V2 is supported by most implementations, but not
> >>> necessarily recommended as a default.
> >>>
> >>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
> >>>
> >>> Votes:
> >>>
> >>> [ ] +1 Accept the changes
> >>> [ ] +0
> >>> [ ] -1 Do accept these changes because ...
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Micah
> >>>
> >>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/0bdyyb7qobrxx94x8v7t5z7g2ksnpyr2
> >>> [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/535
> >>>
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Clarify versioning in parquet-format
Posted by Aihua Xu <ai...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
> On Dec 18, 2025, at 9:42 AM, Antoine Pitrou <an...@python.org> wrote:
>
>
> +1 (binding).
>
> (sorry for overlooking this!)
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
>> Le 18/12/2025 à 16:48, Micah Kornfield a écrit :
>> Just wanted to bump this vote thread.
>> Thanks,
>> Micah
>>> On Monday, December 15, 2025, Micah Kornfield <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'm starting a vote to finalize some ambiguities around current
>>> versioning as documented in https://github.com/apache/
>>> parquet-format/pull/535
>>>
>>> The changes have been discussed on the mailing list [1] and there have
>>> been several reviewers on the PR.
>>>
>>> A TL;DR;
>>> 1. Readers should treat the values 1 and 2 as identical in the version
>>> field in the parquet footer.
>>> 2. Encodings can be used with any page type.
>>> 3. Data page header V2 is supported by most implementations, but not
>>> necessarily recommended as a default.
>>>
>>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>>
>>> Votes:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Accept the changes
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1 Do accept these changes because ...
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Micah
>>>
>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/0bdyyb7qobrxx94x8v7t5z7g2ksnpyr2
>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/535
>>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Clarify versioning in parquet-format
Posted by Aihua Xu <ai...@gmail.com>.
+1 (non-binding)
> On Dec 18, 2025, at 9:42 AM, Antoine Pitrou <an...@python.org> wrote:
>
>
> +1 (binding).
>
> (sorry for overlooking this!)
>
> Regards
>
> Antoine.
>
>
>> Le 18/12/2025 à 16:48, Micah Kornfield a écrit :
>> Just wanted to bump this vote thread.
>> Thanks,
>> Micah
>>> On Monday, December 15, 2025, Micah Kornfield <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'm starting a vote to finalize some ambiguities around current
>>> versioning as documented in https://github.com/apache/
>>> parquet-format/pull/535
>>>
>>> The changes have been discussed on the mailing list [1] and there have
>>> been several reviewers on the PR.
>>>
>>> A TL;DR;
>>> 1. Readers should treat the values 1 and 2 as identical in the version
>>> field in the parquet footer.
>>> 2. Encodings can be used with any page type.
>>> 3. Data page header V2 is supported by most implementations, but not
>>> necessarily recommended as a default.
>>>
>>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>>
>>> Votes:
>>>
>>> [ ] +1 Accept the changes
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1 Do accept these changes because ...
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Micah
>>>
>>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/0bdyyb7qobrxx94x8v7t5z7g2ksnpyr2
>>> [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/535
>>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Clarify versioning in parquet-format
Posted by Antoine Pitrou <an...@python.org>.
+1 (binding).
(sorry for overlooking this!)
Regards
Antoine.
Le 18/12/2025 à 16:48, Micah Kornfield a écrit :
> Just wanted to bump this vote thread.
>
> Thanks,
> Micah
>
> On Monday, December 15, 2025, Micah Kornfield <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I'm starting a vote to finalize some ambiguities around current
>> versioning as documented in https://github.com/apache/
>> parquet-format/pull/535
>>
>> The changes have been discussed on the mailing list [1] and there have
>> been several reviewers on the PR.
>>
>> A TL;DR;
>> 1. Readers should treat the values 1 and 2 as identical in the version
>> field in the parquet footer.
>> 2. Encodings can be used with any page type.
>> 3. Data page header V2 is supported by most implementations, but not
>> necessarily recommended as a default.
>>
>> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>>
>> Votes:
>>
>> [ ] +1 Accept the changes
>> [ ] +0
>> [ ] -1 Do accept these changes because ...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Micah
>>
>> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/0bdyyb7qobrxx94x8v7t5z7g2ksnpyr2
>> [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/535
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Clarify versioning in parquet-format
Posted by Micah Kornfield <em...@gmail.com>.
Just wanted to bump this vote thread.
Thanks,
Micah
On Monday, December 15, 2025, Micah Kornfield <em...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm starting a vote to finalize some ambiguities around current
> versioning as documented in https://github.com/apache/
> parquet-format/pull/535
>
> The changes have been discussed on the mailing list [1] and there have
> been several reviewers on the PR.
>
> A TL;DR;
> 1. Readers should treat the values 1 and 2 as identical in the version
> field in the parquet footer.
> 2. Encodings can be used with any page type.
> 3. Data page header V2 is supported by most implementations, but not
> necessarily recommended as a default.
>
> The vote will remain open for at least 72 hours.
>
> Votes:
>
> [ ] +1 Accept the changes
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 Do accept these changes because ...
>
> Thanks,
> Micah
>
> [1] https://lists.apache.org/thread/0bdyyb7qobrxx94x8v7t5z7g2ksnpyr2
> [2] https://github.com/apache/parquet-format/pull/535
>