[jira] [Commented] (HADOOP-10630) Possible race condition in RetryInvocationHandler

["Jing Zhao (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10630?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=14015916#comment-14015916 ] 

Jing Zhao commented on HADOOP-10630:
------------------------------------

Looks like our failover tests run well with the patch during the weekend. I will commit the patch shortly.

> Possible race condition in RetryInvocationHandler
> -------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-10630
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-10630
>             Project: Hadoop Common
>          Issue Type: Bug
>            Reporter: Jing Zhao
>            Assignee: Jing Zhao
>         Attachments: HADOOP-10630.000.patch
>
>
> In one of our system tests with NameNode HA setup, we ran 300 threads in LoadGenerator. While one of the NameNodes was already in the active state and started to serve, we still saw one of the client thread failed all the retries in a 20 seconds window. In the meanwhile, we saw a lot of following warning msg in the log:
> {noformat}
> WARN retry.RetryInvocationHandler: A failover has occurred since the start of this method invocation attempt.
> {noformat}
> After checking the code, we see the following code in RetryInvocationHandler:
> {code}
>   while (true) {
>       // The number of times this invocation handler has ever been failed over,
>       // before this method invocation attempt. Used to prevent concurrent
>       // failed method invocations from triggering multiple failover attempts.
>       long invocationAttemptFailoverCount;
>       synchronized (proxyProvider) {
>         invocationAttemptFailoverCount = proxyProviderFailoverCount;
>       }
>       ......
>       if (action.action == RetryAction.RetryDecision.FAILOVER_AND_RETRY) {
>             // Make sure that concurrent failed method invocations only cause a
>             // single actual fail over.
>             synchronized (proxyProvider) {
>               if (invocationAttemptFailoverCount == proxyProviderFailoverCount) {
>                 proxyProvider.performFailover(currentProxy.proxy);
>                 proxyProviderFailoverCount++;
>                 currentProxy = proxyProvider.getProxy();
>               } else {
>                 LOG.warn("A failover has occurred since the start of this method"
>                     + " invocation attempt.");
>               }
>             }
>             invocationFailoverCount++;
>           }
>      ......
> {code}
> We can see we refresh the value of currentProxy only when the thread performs the failover (while holding the monitor of the proxyProvider). Because "currentProxy" is not volatile,  a thread that does not perform the failover (in which case it will log the warning msg) may fail to get the new value of currentProxy.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.2#6252)