You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to users@activemq.apache.org by Ning Li <Ni...@businessobjects.com> on 2006/08/09 21:41:45 UTC

Web Clustering support for ActiveMQ

Hi, 

 

I have a question about using JMS in Web Clustering, which is going to
be our usage case in the near future. Currently for ActiveMQ, the
failover is done on the client side by FailoverTransport, all the states
are kept in the memory. If we make the state objects (ConnectionState,
SessionState etc.) serializable, so that if one Web Server is down,
another Web Server can use these serialized objects and go from there.
will this be a feasible solution? Or there are some betters ways to
support ActiveMQ in Web Clustering case.

 

thanks

Re: Web Clustering support for ActiveMQ

Posted by James Strachan <ja...@gmail.com>.

On 8/9/06, Ning Li <Ni...@businessobjects.com> wrote:
> Hi,
> I have a question about using JMS in Web Clustering, which is going to
> be our usage case in the near future. Currently for ActiveMQ, the
> failover is done on the client side by FailoverTransport, all the states
> are kept in the memory. If we make the state objects (ConnectionState,
> SessionState etc.) serializable, so that if one Web Server is down,
> another Web Server can use these serialized objects and go from there.
> will this be a feasible solution? Or there are some betters ways to
> support ActiveMQ in Web Clustering case.

I don't quite follow what you are trying to do. Could you explain your
use case a little more please?

-- 

James
-------
http://radio.weblogs.com/0112098/