You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@accumulo.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2018/08/30 00:39:09 UTC

[GitHub] ctubbsii commented on issue #622: Include version in Jar filenames of Accumulo depedencies

ctubbsii commented on issue #622: Include version in Jar filenames of Accumulo depedencies
URL: https://github.com/apache/accumulo/issues/622#issuecomment-417152347
 
 
   I seem to remember there being some debate about it at the time, but I thought I had made a convincing case for it. I believe it had something to do with making it easier to manage the class path, either by unpacking a newer tarball on top of another (probably a bad idea anyway), or something to do with our scripts being broken every time we bumped the dependency version.
   
   I think going back to the explicit version numbers are fine, but I'd like to first review the history to see if there's any still valid reason why we shouldn't do that.

----------------------------------------------------------------
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.
 
For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org


With regards,
Apache Git Services