You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by "Xu Liang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/04/06 05:20:43 UTC

[jira] Commented: (DIRMINA-203) The performance of LoggingFilter is poor.

    [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-203?page=comments#action_12373463 ] 

Xu Liang commented on DIRMINA-203:
----------------------------------

Yes, I modified the 0.9.2 version in March when the 0.9.3 hadn't released.
I thinked the new SessionLog is valuable now.

Next time I will check the subversion before I do some modification.

> The performance of LoggingFilter is poor.
> -----------------------------------------
>
>          Key: DIRMINA-203
>          URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-203
>      Project: Directory MINA
>         Type: Improvement

>     Versions: 0.9.3
>     Reporter: Xu Liang
>  Attachments: LoggingFilter.java, SessionLog.java
>
> The LoggingFilter's original code :
>     SessionLog.info( session, "RECEIVED: " + message );
> If the logger was disable It called the toString() of message.
> So I have writed new SessionLog whose interface like slf4j.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
   http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
   http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira