You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by "Xu Liang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/04/06 05:20:43 UTC
[jira] Commented: (DIRMINA-203) The performance of LoggingFilter is
poor.
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-203?page=comments#action_12373463 ]
Xu Liang commented on DIRMINA-203:
----------------------------------
Yes, I modified the 0.9.2 version in March when the 0.9.3 hadn't released.
I thinked the new SessionLog is valuable now.
Next time I will check the subversion before I do some modification.
> The performance of LoggingFilter is poor.
> -----------------------------------------
>
> Key: DIRMINA-203
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/DIRMINA-203
> Project: Directory MINA
> Type: Improvement
> Versions: 0.9.3
> Reporter: Xu Liang
> Attachments: LoggingFilter.java, SessionLog.java
>
> The LoggingFilter's original code :
> SessionLog.info( session, "RECEIVED: " + message );
> If the logger was disable It called the toString() of message.
> So I have writed new SessionLog whose interface like slf4j.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators:
http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see:
http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira