line height defaulting (0.20 vs 0.95)

[Julian Reschke <ju...@gmx.de>]

Hi,

I'm helping a customer upgrading from 0.20.4 to 0.95, and we discovered 
a difference in line-height defaulting.

It appears that even when line-height is set explicitly, FOP 0.95 makes 
the inter line space *slightly* bigger. I'll assume that 0.95's behavior 
is the correct one, but I wonder

- what exactly is going on, and

- whether there's another property that could be set to get identical 
results (which would be good during a transition period).

Best regards, Julian

Re: line height defaulting (0.20 vs 0.95)

[Pascal Sancho <pa...@takoma.fr>]

Hi Julian,

You are right, Fop 0.95 does a more precise job, while Fop 0.2x was
buggy in computing block-progression-dimensions.
You can easily check that by measuring 10 text lines on a Pdf print
(with a 1:1 print ratio and using an easy-to-use font-size/line-height
couple).

Pascal

Le 02/07/2010 11:59, Julian Reschke a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I'm helping a customer upgrading from 0.20.4 to 0.95, and we discovered 
> a difference in line-height defaulting.
>
> It appears that even when line-height is set explicitly, FOP 0.95 makes 
> the inter line space *slightly* bigger. I'll assume that 0.95's behavior 
> is the correct one, but I wonder
>
> - what exactly is going on, and
>
> - whether there's another property that could be set to get identical 
> results (which would be good during a transition period).
>
> Best regards, Julian
>   


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: fop-users-unsubscribe@xmlgraphics.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: fop-users-help@xmlgraphics.apache.org