You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to adffaces-dev@incubator.apache.org by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> on 2007/01/06 15:34:26 UTC
Re: ADF vs. JSF 1.2
For some reason I am coming back on this. I don't think we should
deprecate <setActionListener/>, because I really like more the from
and to attributes than the JSF 1.2 value and target
-M
On 6/12/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> If we deprecate setActionListener, we should do the same with
> updateActionListener over in tomahawk.
>
> regards,
>
> Martin
>
> On 6/13/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Ja, right.
> >
> > I just added some notes to these guys, regarding JSF 1.2
> >
> > -Matthias
> >
> > On 6/12/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > af:validator should definitely be deprecated once we get to
> > > JSF 1.2. I'm not sure about deprecating it while we're on 1.1.
> > >
> > > -- Adam
> > >
> > >
> > > On 6/12/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > I don't get you - you mean you want to set the whole tag to
> > deprecated or
> > > > the one property?
> > > >
> > > > regards,
> > > >
> > > > Martin
> > > >
> > > > On 6/12/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > The af:validator already supports binding, which is introduced in
> > JSF 1.2
> > > > > Should we set this "tag" (validator) to @deprecated in flavor of JSF
> > 1.2?
> > > > >
> > > > > Same I suggest for the <af:setActionListener/>.
> > > > >
> > > > > What do you think ?
> > > > >
> > > > > -Matthias
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > Aechterhoek 18
> > > > > 48282 Emsdetten
> > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > >
> > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > >
> > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > Courses in English and German
> > > >
> > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> > Aechterhoek 18
> > 48282 Emsdetten
> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> >
>
>
>
> --
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
further stuff:
blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
Re: ADF vs. JSF 1.2
Posted by Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com>.
FWIW, the origin of <tr:selectItem> wasn't a desire to
have different names (or clone the original component);
it was to support <tr:forEach>. That becomes irrelevant
in JSF 1.2, where f:selectItem will support c:forEach
and t:forEach.
I'm happy enough deprecating setActionListener - whether
we should get rid of it, dunno.
-- Adam
On 1/8/07, Simon Lessard <si...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmmm I don't know. I got used to "from" and "to", but "value" and "target"
> are far more consistent with JSF terminology. Also, I not too fond of
> redundancies as they can confuse new users. I we don't deprecate it we'll
> have to document the fact that it's exactly the same as JSF 1.2 tag except
> for the attribute names as it's done with <tr:selectItem/>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> ~ Simon
>
> On 1/6/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > For some reason I am coming back on this. I don't think we should
> > deprecate <setActionListener/>, because I really like more the from
> > and to attributes than the JSF 1.2 value and target
> >
> > -M
> >
> > On 6/12/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > If we deprecate setActionListener, we should do the same with
> > > updateActionListener over in tomahawk.
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > > Martin
> > >
> > > On 6/13/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Ja, right.
> > > >
> > > > I just added some notes to these guys, regarding JSF 1.2
> > > >
> > > > -Matthias
> > > >
> > > > On 6/12/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > af:validator should definitely be deprecated once we get to
> > > > > JSF 1.2. I'm not sure about deprecating it while we're on 1.1.
> > > > >
> > > > > -- Adam
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 6/12/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > > I don't get you - you mean you want to set the whole tag to
> > > > deprecated or
> > > > > > the one property?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > regards,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Martin
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On 6/12/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > The af:validator already supports binding, which is introduced
> > in
> > > > JSF 1.2
> > > > > > > Should we set this "tag" (validator) to @deprecated in flavor of
> > JSF
> > > > 1.2?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Same I suggest for the <af:setActionListener/>.
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > What do you think ?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > > Aechterhoek 18
> > > > > > > 48282 Emsdetten
> > > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > Aechterhoek 18
> > > > 48282 Emsdetten
> > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > >
> > > http://www.irian.at
> > >
> > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > Courses in English and German
> > >
> > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Matthias Wessendorf
> > http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
> >
> > further stuff:
> > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> >
>
>
Re: ADF vs. JSF 1.2
Posted by Simon Lessard <si...@gmail.com>.
Hmmm I don't know. I got used to "from" and "to", but "value" and "target"
are far more consistent with JSF terminology. Also, I not too fond of
redundancies as they can confuse new users. I we don't deprecate it we'll
have to document the fact that it's exactly the same as JSF 1.2 tag except
for the attribute names as it's done with <tr:selectItem/>
Regards,
~ Simon
On 1/6/07, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> For some reason I am coming back on this. I don't think we should
> deprecate <setActionListener/>, because I really like more the from
> and to attributes than the JSF 1.2 value and target
>
> -M
>
> On 6/12/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > If we deprecate setActionListener, we should do the same with
> > updateActionListener over in tomahawk.
> >
> > regards,
> >
> > Martin
> >
> > On 6/13/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > Ja, right.
> > >
> > > I just added some notes to these guys, regarding JSF 1.2
> > >
> > > -Matthias
> > >
> > > On 6/12/06, Adam Winer <aw...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > af:validator should definitely be deprecated once we get to
> > > > JSF 1.2. I'm not sure about deprecating it while we're on 1.1.
> > > >
> > > > -- Adam
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 6/12/06, Martin Marinschek <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > > > > I don't get you - you mean you want to set the whole tag to
> > > deprecated or
> > > > > the one property?
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > > Martin
> > > > >
> > > > > On 6/12/06, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > The af:validator already supports binding, which is introduced
> in
> > > JSF 1.2
> > > > > > Should we set this "tag" (validator) to @deprecated in flavor of
> JSF
> > > 1.2?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Same I suggest for the <af:setActionListener/>.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > What do you think ?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Matthias
> > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > > > > Aechterhoek 18
> > > > > > 48282 Emsdetten
> > > > > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > > > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > >
> > > > > http://www.irian.at
> > > > >
> > > > > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > > > > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > > > > Courses in English and German
> > > > >
> > > > > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > Matthias Wessendorf
> > > Aechterhoek 18
> > > 48282 Emsdetten
> > > blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> > > mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
> http://tinyurl.com/fmywh
>
> further stuff:
> blog: http://jroller.com/page/mwessendorf
> mail: mwessendorf-at-gmail-dot-com
>