You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@cxf.apache.org by dilipjain70 <di...@hotmail.com> on 2015/06/02 01:43:22 UTC
WADLManager cache
Hello,
We're currently using CXF 2.7.7. When invoking a Web service, if the
Service Provider changes the WSDL, what are our options to get around WSDL
caching by WSDLManager?
We're open to upgrading to CXF 3.x if we can address this? What would be
the performance hit for not using WSDLManager caching?
Thank you in advance.
--
Dilip
--
View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/WADLManager-cache-tp5757844.html
Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Re: WADLManager cache
Posted by Daniel Kulp <dk...@apache.org>.
> On Jun 1, 2015, at 7:43 PM, dilipjain70 <di...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hello,
> We're currently using CXF 2.7.7. When invoking a Web service, if the
> Service Provider changes the WSDL, what are our options to get around WSDL
> caching by WSDLManager?
You can grab the WSDLManager and doe something like:
manager.removeDefintion(manager.getDefinition(url));
prior to creating your client or whatever. That would force the WSDLManger to have to refresh it.
> We're open to upgrading to CXF 3.x if we can address this? What would be
> the performance hit for not using WSDLManager caching?
Parsing a wsdl can be expensive (depending on the size of the wsdl, network speed, etc…) which could cause delays. Also, if you have multiple clients or services, they would all end up with their own copy held internally which would increase the memory usage.
--
Daniel Kulp
dkulp@apache.org - http://dankulp.com/blog
Talend Community Coder - http://coders.talend.com
Re: WSDLManager cache
Posted by Sergey Beryozkin <sb...@gmail.com>.
Just updating the Subject to avoid the confusions
Cheers, Sergey
On 02/06/15 00:43, dilipjain70 wrote:
> Hello,
> We're currently using CXF 2.7.7. When invoking a Web service, if the
> Service Provider changes the WSDL, what are our options to get around WSDL
> caching by WSDLManager?
>
> We're open to upgrading to CXF 3.x if we can address this? What would be
> the performance hit for not using WSDLManager caching?
>
> Thank you in advance.
> --
> Dilip
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://cxf.547215.n5.nabble.com/WADLManager-cache-tp5757844.html
> Sent from the cxf-user mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>