You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to general@incubator.apache.org by Ali Lown <al...@lown.me.uk> on 2015/11/03 17:09:40 UTC
[VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Hi,
Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to make
its first release since joining the incubator in 2010.
The Wave PPMC has voted in favour with 6 binding votes, and 4
non-binding votes from the community.
PPMC vote call:
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCABRGrVdhdhhdRMwJ9jsWxzqMX9ijzgG%3Di5BF1YJBAZ2juYFORg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
PPMC vote result (second result after a slow start for the first attempt):
https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
Staging directory:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/
Please note that
- checksums are generated from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha'
- .zip versions are generated from the .tar.bz2 version by repacking
- binary artifacts are provided for convenience of the end-user, the
vote is primarily regarding the source artifacts
Git branch:
https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-rc10
KEYS file:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/KEYS
Please verify the release and vote. This vote will close after 72
hours on 6th November.
[] +1: I approve
[] -1: I disapprove because...
Please add (binding) if your vote is binding.
Thanks,
Ali
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by Ali Lown <al...@lown.me.uk>.
Removing them seems reasonable. They are only used as part of a
test-case, which is only accessed if someone is developing using the
hosted editor.
I shall do this as part of the next release.
Ali
On 10 November 2015 at 23:44, Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> Do you have the authors permission to use and distribute them?
>>
>> I have no information on the original taker of the photo.
>
> Perhaps these were missed as part of the IP clearance step? [1] As the provenance is a little unclear I’d suggest they be replaced, but up to you.
>
> Thanks,
> Justin
>
> 1. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-provenance
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com>.
Hi,
>> Do you have the authors permission to use and distribute them?
>
> I have no information on the original taker of the photo.
Perhaps these were missed as part of the IP clearance step? [1] As the provenance is a little unclear I’d suggest they be replaced, but up to you.
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://incubator.apache.org/guides/mentor.html#initial-provenance
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by Ali Lown <al...@lown.me.uk>.
Hi Justin,
>> Are you referring to the screenshots under war/static/? Those are
>> untouched since the migration from Google, so fall under the license
>> from them.
>
> Not the screen shots no but the photos found in here:
> ./src/org/waveprotocol/wave/client/editor/harness/public/pics/
>
> Do you have the authors permission to use and distribute them?
I have no information on the original taker of the photo. They were
committed into ASF as part of b3815a04e9114511ce962df0a70ed56841e3a003
[0], which is the import commit by Michael Macfadden from the Google
Wave-Protocol source. Looking there, I can only trace these back to a
commit by Alex North (a0bb2b999819) [1], which is "merges libraries
repository into default repository".
As such, these appear to fall under the migratory license from Google again.
Ali
[0]: https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=commit;h=b3815a04e9114511ce962df0a70ed56841e3a003
[1]: https://code.google.com/p/wave-protocol/source/detail?spec=svn6a56af40d8236b8a707af8755f48ebfbcff4fa6e&name=6a56af40d823.&r=a0bb2b9998191b46f43ed613c924e8a05ac7dd31
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@me.com>.
Hi,
> Are you referring to the screenshots under war/static/? Those are
> untouched since the migration from Google, so fall under the license
> from them.
Not the screen shots no but the photos found in here:
./src/org/waveprotocol/wave/client/editor/harness/public/pics/
Do you have the authors permission to use and distribute them?
> These icons are from the Tango Desktop Project, which licenses them
> into the public domain, who are mentioned in THANKS. I can mention
> this explicitly in THANKS if preferable?
In that case should be added to LICENSE. Only minor issue, certainly nothing to hold up this release.
Thanks,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by Ali Lown <al...@lown.me.uk>.
Hi Justin,
Thanks for taking a look at the RC, we will fix these minor points for
the next release.
> I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source release, I assume you have permission from the person who took them to use these? IF so you may want to put that in the LICENSE.
Are you referring to the screenshots under war/static/? Those are
untouched since the migration from Google, so fall under the license
from them.
> There's a number of binary file without extensions in /thumbnail_patterns/ but they all look to be PNGs is this the case? Where did these images come from?
These icons are from the Tango Desktop Project, which licenses them
into the public domain, who are mentioned in THANKS. I can mention
this explicitly in THANKS if preferable?
Are there any other IPMC able to take a look at this release, as I
don't seem to have enough votes yet?
Regards,
Ali
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by Ali Lown <al...@lown.me.uk>.
Hi Ian,
Perhaps you could provide some more information on exactly what steps
you took to the wave-dev list, where we can try to help you with
getting this to work on your machine, I doubt everyone else on
incubator-general is quite as interested...
Using a different Java version on Windows normally just requires
changing the path system variable to reflect the location of the JDK
you are interested in using.
Ali
On 9 November 2015 at 19:08, Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hello,
>
> I did try to use the CLI to build it but ran into java issues since
> windows seems determined to use java 8 and i can only get java 7 to
> run inside eclipse. Getting windows to use an older version of java
> seems like a fairly difficult or poorly documented task nowadays.
> Suggestions welcome (though as noted earlier they may belong a a
> different list).
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
> On 08/11/15 19:41, John D. Ament wrote:
>> Typically speaking, releases should compile. If there are steps
>> required to make it compile they should be shared. On Nov 8, 2015
>> 14:33, "Upayavira" <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Ian,
>>>
>>> Please bear in mind that this release vote is to validate the
>>> legal aspects of the release, not its technical merits. Technical
>>> merits can be resolved in subsequent releases.
>>>
>>> Upayavira
>>>
>>> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015, at 02:51 PM, Ian Dunlop wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'll give it at 0 the moment since I encountered a build issue. I
>> downloaded the src zip and imported the code into Eclipse Mars
>> (4.50) with jdk 1.7.0_79 & ANT 1.9.4 but found the following
>> issues:
>>
>> 1) BUILD FAILED C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:28:
>> Cannot find
>> C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\${build.classpath.path}
>> imported from C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml
>>
>> Resolved by commenting out
>>
>> <import file="${build.classpath.path}"/>
>>
>> <!-- Import macros --> <import file="${build.macros.path}"/>
>>
>> and tried again
>>
>> 2)
>>
>> BUILD FAILED Target "define-gxpc" does not exist in the project
>> "waveinabox". It is used from target "gen-gxp".
>>
>> Resolved by removing define-gxpc from
>>
>> <target name="gen-gxp" description="Generates GXP files"
>> depends="init, define-gxpc, gen-gxp-dep" unless="skip.gen-gxp">
>> <gxpc srcdir="${src.dir}" srcpaths="${src.dir}"
>> destdir="${gen.dir}/gxp" target="org.waveprotocol.box.server.gxp"
>> /> <touch file="${dep}/gen-gxp"/> </target>
>>
>> 3)
>>
>> BUILD FAILED C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:120:
>> Problem: failed to create task or type buildproto Cause: The name
>> is undefined. Action: Check the spelling. Action: Check that any
>> custom tasks/types have been declared. Action: Check that any
>> <presetdef>/<macrodef> declarations have taken place.
>>
>> At that point I figured it best to report the issues here:
>>
>> Is there a procedure for building in eclipse, am I missing an ant
>> setting somewhere?
>>
>> So, apart fromn the compile issue everything else looks good:
>>
>> signatures are good artifact/hashes good DISCLAIMER OK LICENCE OK
>> NOTICE OK
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Ian
>>
>>
>>
>> On 04/11/2015 07:14, Justin Mclean wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> +1 binding.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Could you please fix the LICENCE Appendix in the next
>>>>>> release. The text should be "Copyright [yyyy] [name of
>>>>>> copyright owner]” not "Copyright 2013 The Apache Software
>>>>>> Foundation”.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I checked: - artefact has incubating in name - signatures
>>>>>> and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE has minor
>>>>>> issue with the copyright in the appendix. Not required but
>>>>>> it could also use the sort form in LICENSE [1] particularly
>>>>>> as you bundle the software LICENSE files. - NOTICE good. -
>>>>>> All source files have Apache headers - No unexpected binary
>>>>>> file in source release (but see below) - can compile from
>>>>>> source - test pass
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source
>>>>>> release, I assume you have permission from the person who
>>>>>> took them to use these? IF so you may want to put that in
>>>>>> the LICENSE.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> There's a number of binary file without extensions in
>>>>>> /thumbnail_patterns/ but they all look to be PNGs is this
>>>>>> the case? Where did these images come from?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I had a quick look at the binary release and the LICENCE
>>>>>> and NOTICE appear comprehensive. I didn;t do a though
>>>>>> check. I did notice that the year is incorrect in the
>>>>>> NOTICE file and LICENSE appendix has the same issue. It’s
>>>>>> actually wrong here as non ASF Apache licensed software is
>>>>>> mentioned. There no need to mean Apache licensed software
>>>>>> in the LICENCE but no harm is done by donning so. [2]
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks, Justin
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1.
>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
> 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
> - ---
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>>>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>>> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>>
>>
>>>>
>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
> - -
>>>>
>>>>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>>
>>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1
>
> iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWQO8WAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5Bi0H/R1tQzrcoBZAegXKP3ZgOriq
> 2ad3U6bOtr7eod52KFsoT9bnfC8Nekoqe6/F7RCh0qzmUP0Nchct3/OVf8atfy8J
> c2GdHl/Wp4Lony7cxdnHn8a5wdus+SHrY/edvsYoHSCHkcQL24i9Jd34sT4AjJIO
> f5YUnTlf3JRHMui/TRuxR+HNmzTANsY4Hl0UZgkm/N1YK7BIDfTJDBDF8Sm9aRVJ
> n9F0IbIOu8MFCMoewmJbmb806+QepfV+MU5AniS01iFYqKX/nX+txf/hS2qukBj/
> jWvyTVDJ7E/qkSLawvX/YlXXFnt/tpSqSobOmMbdENFAOhGWwFEOsa4BgLhao38=
> =t/Me
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hello,
I did try to use the CLI to build it but ran into java issues since
windows seems determined to use java 8 and i can only get java 7 to
run inside eclipse. Getting windows to use an older version of java
seems like a fairly difficult or poorly documented task nowadays.
Suggestions welcome (though as noted earlier they may belong a a
different list).
Cheers,
Ian
On 08/11/15 19:41, John D. Ament wrote:
> Typically speaking, releases should compile. If there are steps
> required to make it compile they should be shared. On Nov 8, 2015
> 14:33, "Upayavira" <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
>
>> Ian,
>>
>> Please bear in mind that this release vote is to validate the
>> legal aspects of the release, not its technical merits. Technical
>> merits can be resolved in subsequent releases.
>>
>> Upayavira
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015, at 02:51 PM, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'll give it at 0 the moment since I encountered a build issue. I
> downloaded the src zip and imported the code into Eclipse Mars
> (4.50) with jdk 1.7.0_79 & ANT 1.9.4 but found the following
> issues:
>
> 1) BUILD FAILED C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:28:
> Cannot find
> C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\${build.classpath.path}
> imported from C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml
>
> Resolved by commenting out
>
> <import file="${build.classpath.path}"/>
>
> <!-- Import macros --> <import file="${build.macros.path}"/>
>
> and tried again
>
> 2)
>
> BUILD FAILED Target "define-gxpc" does not exist in the project
> "waveinabox". It is used from target "gen-gxp".
>
> Resolved by removing define-gxpc from
>
> <target name="gen-gxp" description="Generates GXP files"
> depends="init, define-gxpc, gen-gxp-dep" unless="skip.gen-gxp">
> <gxpc srcdir="${src.dir}" srcpaths="${src.dir}"
> destdir="${gen.dir}/gxp" target="org.waveprotocol.box.server.gxp"
> /> <touch file="${dep}/gen-gxp"/> </target>
>
> 3)
>
> BUILD FAILED C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:120:
> Problem: failed to create task or type buildproto Cause: The name
> is undefined. Action: Check the spelling. Action: Check that any
> custom tasks/types have been declared. Action: Check that any
> <presetdef>/<macrodef> declarations have taken place.
>
> At that point I figured it best to report the issues here:
>
> Is there a procedure for building in eclipse, am I missing an ant
> setting somewhere?
>
> So, apart fromn the compile issue everything else looks good:
>
> signatures are good artifact/hashes good DISCLAIMER OK LICENCE OK
> NOTICE OK
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
>
>
> On 04/11/2015 07:14, Justin Mclean wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 binding.
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you please fix the LICENCE Appendix in the next
>>>>> release. The text should be "Copyright [yyyy] [name of
>>>>> copyright owner]” not "Copyright 2013 The Apache Software
>>>>> Foundation”.
>>>>>
>>>>> I checked: - artefact has incubating in name - signatures
>>>>> and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE has minor
>>>>> issue with the copyright in the appendix. Not required but
>>>>> it could also use the sort form in LICENSE [1] particularly
>>>>> as you bundle the software LICENSE files. - NOTICE good. -
>>>>> All source files have Apache headers - No unexpected binary
>>>>> file in source release (but see below) - can compile from
>>>>> source - test pass
>>>>>
>>>>> I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source
>>>>> release, I assume you have permission from the person who
>>>>> took them to use these? IF so you may want to put that in
>>>>> the LICENSE.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's a number of binary file without extensions in
>>>>> /thumbnail_patterns/ but they all look to be PNGs is this
>>>>> the case? Where did these images come from?
>>>>>
>>>>> I had a quick look at the binary release and the LICENCE
>>>>> and NOTICE appear comprehensive. I didn;t do a though
>>>>> check. I did notice that the year is incorrect in the
>>>>> NOTICE file and LICENSE appendix has the same issue. It’s
>>>>> actually wrong here as non ASF Apache licensed software is
>>>>> mentioned. There no need to mean Apache licensed software
>>>>> in the LICENCE but no harm is done by donning so. [2]
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, Justin
>>>>>
>>>>> 1.
>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
>>>>>
>>>>>
2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
- ---
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
>>>>>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
- -
>>>
>>>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJWQO8WAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5Bi0H/R1tQzrcoBZAegXKP3ZgOriq
2ad3U6bOtr7eod52KFsoT9bnfC8Nekoqe6/F7RCh0qzmUP0Nchct3/OVf8atfy8J
c2GdHl/Wp4Lony7cxdnHn8a5wdus+SHrY/edvsYoHSCHkcQL24i9Jd34sT4AjJIO
f5YUnTlf3JRHMui/TRuxR+HNmzTANsY4Hl0UZgkm/N1YK7BIDfTJDBDF8Sm9aRVJ
n9F0IbIOu8MFCMoewmJbmb806+QepfV+MU5AniS01iFYqKX/nX+txf/hS2qukBj/
jWvyTVDJ7E/qkSLawvX/YlXXFnt/tpSqSobOmMbdENFAOhGWwFEOsa4BgLhao38=
=t/Me
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
Typically speaking, releases should compile. If there are steps required
to make it compile they should be shared.
On Nov 8, 2015 14:33, "Upayavira" <uv...@odoko.co.uk> wrote:
> Ian,
>
> Please bear in mind that this release vote is to validate the legal
> aspects of the release, not its technical merits. Technical merits can
> be resolved in subsequent releases.
>
> Upayavira
>
> On Fri, Nov 6, 2015, at 02:51 PM, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'll give it at 0 the moment since I encountered a build issue. I
> > downloaded the src zip and imported the code into Eclipse Mars (4.50)
> > with jdk 1.7.0_79 & ANT 1.9.4 but found the following issues:
> >
> > 1)
> > BUILD FAILED
> > C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:28: Cannot find
> > C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\${build.classpath.path} imported
> > from C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml
> >
> > Resolved by commenting out
> >
> > <import file="${build.classpath.path}"/>
> >
> > <!-- Import macros -->
> > <import file="${build.macros.path}"/>
> >
> > and tried again
> >
> > 2)
> >
> > BUILD FAILED
> > Target "define-gxpc" does not exist in the project "waveinabox". It is
> > used from target "gen-gxp".
> >
> > Resolved by removing define-gxpc from
> >
> > <target name="gen-gxp" description="Generates GXP files"
> > depends="init, define-gxpc, gen-gxp-dep" unless="skip.gen-gxp">
> > <gxpc srcdir="${src.dir}" srcpaths="${src.dir}"
> > destdir="${gen.dir}/gxp"
> > target="org.waveprotocol.box.server.gxp" />
> > <touch file="${dep}/gen-gxp"/>
> > </target>
> >
> > 3)
> >
> > BUILD FAILED
> > C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:120: Problem: failed
> > to create task or type buildproto
> > Cause: The name is undefined.
> > Action: Check the spelling.
> > Action: Check that any custom tasks/types have been declared.
> > Action: Check that any <presetdef>/<macrodef> declarations have taken
> > place.
> >
> > At that point I figured it best to report the issues here:
> >
> > Is there a procedure for building in eclipse, am I missing an ant
> > setting somewhere?
> >
> > So, apart fromn the compile issue everything else looks good:
> >
> > signatures are good
> > artifact/hashes good
> > DISCLAIMER OK
> > LICENCE OK
> > NOTICE OK
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Ian
> >
> >
> >
> > On 04/11/2015 07:14, Justin Mclean wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > +1 binding.
> > >
> > > Could you please fix the LICENCE Appendix in the next release. The
> > > text should be "Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]” not
> > > "Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation”.
> > >
> > > I checked: - artefact has incubating in name - signatures and
> > > hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE has minor issue with the
> > > copyright in the appendix. Not required but it could also use the
> > > sort form in LICENSE [1] particularly as you bundle the software
> > > LICENSE files. - NOTICE good. - All source files have Apache
> > > headers - No unexpected binary file in source release (but see
> > > below) - can compile from source - test pass
> > >
> > > I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source release, I
> > > assume you have permission from the person who took them to use
> > > these? IF so you may want to put that in the LICENSE.
> > >
> > > There's a number of binary file without extensions in
> > > /thumbnail_patterns/ but they all look to be PNGs is this the case?
> > > Where did these images come from?
> > >
> > > I had a quick look at the binary release and the LICENCE and NOTICE
> > > appear comprehensive. I didn;t do a though check. I did notice that
> > > the year is incorrect in the NOTICE file and LICENSE appendix has
> > > the same issue. It’s actually wrong here as non ASF Apache
> > > licensed software is mentioned. There no need to mean Apache
> > > licensed software in the LICENCE but no harm is done by donning so.
> > > [2]
> > >
> > > Thanks, Justin
> > >
> > > 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
> > > 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > >
> > >
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> > >
> >
> > - --
> > Ian Dunlop, eScience Lab
> > School of Computer Science
> > The University of Manchester
> > http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7066-3350
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v2
> >
> > iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWPL6FAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5agYH/3yPH2vLCltvOqIZlv70TJ9R
> > EmdbRL6rvpJjcah+GH9BPpsYEeENXw5WTARH42RVZT4gFUz62GBIkZhhqFks0/qx
> > ubL+bekcivMI2P/eZ3T6S/mKw52d8esRaDvrMKaUZ3Ax3tdkYt/dPaYoXGxAMNS4
> > 5IolSgvMaTT2qKlcx0fmCh+gdfmxHFo0ZTvZ55V9ucnmsvQY8orGqZt7SJ+jdySz
> > vp9AIvnxStMCorZ8tKSLDVo1H+ciQOXxCZWymFlAlm7nQAw5KoLQYMp/OBUrw6Lk
> > urdolruKU7YGgdwh5uV8WHi+cCfpIyQIRaIz8nFlXYTFx/VL8Dm7vrgFpcH1jyw=
> > =d5Aa
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by Upayavira <uv...@odoko.co.uk>.
Ian,
Please bear in mind that this release vote is to validate the legal
aspects of the release, not its technical merits. Technical merits can
be resolved in subsequent releases.
Upayavira
On Fri, Nov 6, 2015, at 02:51 PM, Ian Dunlop wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hello,
>
> I'll give it at 0 the moment since I encountered a build issue. I
> downloaded the src zip and imported the code into Eclipse Mars (4.50)
> with jdk 1.7.0_79 & ANT 1.9.4 but found the following issues:
>
> 1)
> BUILD FAILED
> C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:28: Cannot find
> C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\${build.classpath.path} imported
> from C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml
>
> Resolved by commenting out
>
> <import file="${build.classpath.path}"/>
>
> <!-- Import macros -->
> <import file="${build.macros.path}"/>
>
> and tried again
>
> 2)
>
> BUILD FAILED
> Target "define-gxpc" does not exist in the project "waveinabox". It is
> used from target "gen-gxp".
>
> Resolved by removing define-gxpc from
>
> <target name="gen-gxp" description="Generates GXP files"
> depends="init, define-gxpc, gen-gxp-dep" unless="skip.gen-gxp">
> <gxpc srcdir="${src.dir}" srcpaths="${src.dir}"
> destdir="${gen.dir}/gxp"
> target="org.waveprotocol.box.server.gxp" />
> <touch file="${dep}/gen-gxp"/>
> </target>
>
> 3)
>
> BUILD FAILED
> C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:120: Problem: failed
> to create task or type buildproto
> Cause: The name is undefined.
> Action: Check the spelling.
> Action: Check that any custom tasks/types have been declared.
> Action: Check that any <presetdef>/<macrodef> declarations have taken
> place.
>
> At that point I figured it best to report the issues here:
>
> Is there a procedure for building in eclipse, am I missing an ant
> setting somewhere?
>
> So, apart fromn the compile issue everything else looks good:
>
> signatures are good
> artifact/hashes good
> DISCLAIMER OK
> LICENCE OK
> NOTICE OK
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
>
>
> On 04/11/2015 07:14, Justin Mclean wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > +1 binding.
> >
> > Could you please fix the LICENCE Appendix in the next release. The
> > text should be "Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]” not
> > "Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation”.
> >
> > I checked: - artefact has incubating in name - signatures and
> > hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE has minor issue with the
> > copyright in the appendix. Not required but it could also use the
> > sort form in LICENSE [1] particularly as you bundle the software
> > LICENSE files. - NOTICE good. - All source files have Apache
> > headers - No unexpected binary file in source release (but see
> > below) - can compile from source - test pass
> >
> > I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source release, I
> > assume you have permission from the person who took them to use
> > these? IF so you may want to put that in the LICENSE.
> >
> > There's a number of binary file without extensions in
> > /thumbnail_patterns/ but they all look to be PNGs is this the case?
> > Where did these images come from?
> >
> > I had a quick look at the binary release and the LICENCE and NOTICE
> > appear comprehensive. I didn;t do a though check. I did notice that
> > the year is incorrect in the NOTICE file and LICENSE appendix has
> > the same issue. It’s actually wrong here as non ASF Apache
> > licensed software is mentioned. There no need to mean Apache
> > licensed software in the LICENCE but no harm is done by donning so.
> > [2]
> >
> > Thanks, Justin
> >
> > 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
> > 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
> >
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
> - --
> Ian Dunlop, eScience Lab
> School of Computer Science
> The University of Manchester
> http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7066-3350
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWPL6FAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5agYH/3yPH2vLCltvOqIZlv70TJ9R
> EmdbRL6rvpJjcah+GH9BPpsYEeENXw5WTARH42RVZT4gFUz62GBIkZhhqFks0/qx
> ubL+bekcivMI2P/eZ3T6S/mKw52d8esRaDvrMKaUZ3Ax3tdkYt/dPaYoXGxAMNS4
> 5IolSgvMaTT2qKlcx0fmCh+gdfmxHFo0ZTvZ55V9ucnmsvQY8orGqZt7SJ+jdySz
> vp9AIvnxStMCorZ8tKSLDVo1H+ciQOXxCZWymFlAlm7nQAw5KoLQYMp/OBUrw6Lk
> urdolruKU7YGgdwh5uV8WHi+cCfpIyQIRaIz8nFlXYTFx/VL8Dm7vrgFpcH1jyw=
> =d5Aa
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hello,
No issues. I have now managed to compile it with no problems on Ubuntu
14.04. (Thanks for the reminder :) )
+1
Cheers,
Ian
On 29/12/2015 08:02, Yuri Z wrote:
> Hi Ian Are there any more issues that hold you from voting on the
> Apache Wave release on general@apache?
>
> On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 3:25 AM Ali Lown <al...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>
>> Hi Ian,
>>
>> I am not sure about the best way to import this into eclipse, I
>> have always used the CLI tools directly. I have CC'd the dev-list
>> in case they have a better answer for you.
>>
>> The inability to find ${build.classpath.path},
>> ${build.macros.path} suggests that you are
>> missing/failed-to-import/failed-to-reference the build.properties
>> file which contains the values for these macros.
>>
>> The follow-up problem about missing define-gxpc is to be
>> expected because of the above problem resulting in it not
>> importing build-macros.xml, which defines "define-gxpc" amongst
>> other things.
>>
>> Ali
>>
>> On 6 November 2015 at 14:51, Ian Dunlop
>> <ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'll give it at 0 the moment since I encountered a build issue. I
> downloaded the src zip and imported the code into Eclipse Mars
> (4.50) with jdk 1.7.0_79 & ANT 1.9.4 but found the following
> issues:
>
> 1) BUILD FAILED C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:28:
> Cannot find
> C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\${build.classpath.path}
> imported from C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml
>
> Resolved by commenting out
>
> <import file="${build.classpath.path}"/>
>
> <!-- Import macros --> <import file="${build.macros.path}"/>
>
> and tried again
>
> 2)
>
> BUILD FAILED Target "define-gxpc" does not exist in the project
> "waveinabox". It is used from target "gen-gxp".
>
> Resolved by removing define-gxpc from
>
> <target name="gen-gxp" description="Generates GXP files"
> depends="init, define-gxpc, gen-gxp-dep" unless="skip.gen-gxp">
> <gxpc srcdir="${src.dir}" srcpaths="${src.dir}"
> destdir="${gen.dir}/gxp" target="org.waveprotocol.box.server.gxp"
> /> <touch file="${dep}/gen-gxp"/> </target>
>
> 3)
>
> BUILD FAILED C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:120:
> Problem: failed to create task or type buildproto Cause: The name
> is undefined. Action: Check the spelling. Action: Check that any
> custom tasks/types have been declared. Action: Check that any
> <presetdef>/<macrodef> declarations have taken place.
>
> At that point I figured it best to report the issues here:
>
> Is there a procedure for building in eclipse, am I missing an ant
> setting somewhere?
>
> So, apart fromn the compile issue everything else looks good:
>
> signatures are good artifact/hashes good DISCLAIMER OK LICENCE OK
> NOTICE OK
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
>
>
> On 04/11/2015 07:14, Justin Mclean wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> +1 binding.
>>>>>
>>>>> Could you please fix the LICENCE Appendix in the next
>>>>> release. The text should be "Copyright [yyyy] [name of
>>>>> copyright owner]” not "Copyright 2013 The Apache Software
>>>>> Foundation”.
>>>>>
>>>>> I checked: - artefact has incubating in name - signatures
>>>>> and hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE has minor
>>>>> issue with the copyright in the appendix. Not required but
>>>>> it could also use the sort form in LICENSE [1] particularly
>>>>> as you bundle the software LICENSE files. - NOTICE good. -
>>>>> All source files have Apache headers - No unexpected binary
>>>>> file in source release (but see below) - can compile from
>>>>> source - test pass
>>>>>
>>>>> I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source
>>>>> release, I assume you have permission from the person who
>>>>> took them to use these? IF so you may want to put that in
>>>>> the LICENSE.
>>>>>
>>>>> There's a number of binary file without extensions in
>>>>> /thumbnail_patterns/ but they all look to be PNGs is this
>>>>> the case? Where did these images come from?
>>>>>
>>>>> I had a quick look at the binary release and the LICENCE
>>>>> and NOTICE appear comprehensive. I didn;t do a though
>>>>> check. I did notice that the year is incorrect in the
>>>>> NOTICE file and LICENSE appendix has the same issue. It’s
>>>>> actually wrong here as non ASF Apache licensed software is
>>>>> mentioned. There no need to mean Apache licensed software
>>>>> in the LICENCE but no harm is done by donning so. [2]
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks, Justin
>>>>>
>>>>> 1.
>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
>>>>>
>>>>>
2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------
- ---
>>>>>
>>>>>
>
>>>>>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>>>> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>>>
>
>>>
>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------
- -
>>>
>>>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail:
>>> general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>>
>>
>
- --
Ian Dunlop, eScience Lab
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7066-3350
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWilzvAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5SsMH/RrlHBIiVdNhfFrE8GcF6PZ1
LVNuPWvzMFLJ+7juykKfxkYE6anNNe3KnmCS3VCX3RuME/l8Cnkpv8McvL954R3Q
BkXrEo7acbBGf/5t0chFHzXY4yJmP2+rTBcy+KHhv4x3AWuXSqgckPNNd/T+BIWd
SWeHKhAeqhZUz6sQpg2629AASlzlxTDpImvunsMgRkeAxuyl66m2d01nDrmr4fXV
1Rqtn57UC2VYufwe3B6T1K9lUOpxQOIWXtiQnyYrW6FBDxD3u1gsoklTXSCPNe3o
Jno8D6m9fdcskIioQUCarBY9hZx/+z3c4h2KNlHMzQTZAIgKvyXD6tlPNI8i3e0=
=IelF
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by Yuri Z <ve...@gmail.com>.
Hi Ian
Are there any more issues that hold you from voting on the Apache Wave
release on general@apache?
On Sat, Nov 7, 2015 at 3:25 AM Ali Lown <al...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> Hi Ian,
>
> I am not sure about the best way to import this into eclipse, I have
> always used the CLI tools directly. I have CC'd the dev-list in case
> they have a better answer for you.
>
> The inability to find ${build.classpath.path}, ${build.macros.path}
> suggests that you are missing/failed-to-import/failed-to-reference the
> build.properties file which contains the values for these macros.
>
> The follow-up problem about missing define-gxpc is to be expected
> because of the above problem resulting in it not importing
> build-macros.xml, which defines "define-gxpc" amongst other things.
>
> Ali
>
> On 6 November 2015 at 14:51, Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk>
> wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA256
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'll give it at 0 the moment since I encountered a build issue. I
> > downloaded the src zip and imported the code into Eclipse Mars (4.50)
> > with jdk 1.7.0_79 & ANT 1.9.4 but found the following issues:
> >
> > 1)
> > BUILD FAILED
> > C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:28: Cannot find
> > C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\${build.classpath.path} imported
> > from C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml
> >
> > Resolved by commenting out
> >
> > <import file="${build.classpath.path}"/>
> >
> > <!-- Import macros -->
> > <import file="${build.macros.path}"/>
> >
> > and tried again
> >
> > 2)
> >
> > BUILD FAILED
> > Target "define-gxpc" does not exist in the project "waveinabox". It is
> > used from target "gen-gxp".
> >
> > Resolved by removing define-gxpc from
> >
> > <target name="gen-gxp" description="Generates GXP files"
> > depends="init, define-gxpc, gen-gxp-dep" unless="skip.gen-gxp">
> > <gxpc srcdir="${src.dir}" srcpaths="${src.dir}"
> > destdir="${gen.dir}/gxp"
> > target="org.waveprotocol.box.server.gxp" />
> > <touch file="${dep}/gen-gxp"/>
> > </target>
> >
> > 3)
> >
> > BUILD FAILED
> > C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:120: Problem: failed
> > to create task or type buildproto
> > Cause: The name is undefined.
> > Action: Check the spelling.
> > Action: Check that any custom tasks/types have been declared.
> > Action: Check that any <presetdef>/<macrodef> declarations have taken
> > place.
> >
> > At that point I figured it best to report the issues here:
> >
> > Is there a procedure for building in eclipse, am I missing an ant
> > setting somewhere?
> >
> > So, apart fromn the compile issue everything else looks good:
> >
> > signatures are good
> > artifact/hashes good
> > DISCLAIMER OK
> > LICENCE OK
> > NOTICE OK
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Ian
> >
> >
> >
> > On 04/11/2015 07:14, Justin Mclean wrote:
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> +1 binding.
> >>
> >> Could you please fix the LICENCE Appendix in the next release. The
> >> text should be "Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]” not
> >> "Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation”.
> >>
> >> I checked: - artefact has incubating in name - signatures and
> >> hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE has minor issue with the
> >> copyright in the appendix. Not required but it could also use the
> >> sort form in LICENSE [1] particularly as you bundle the software
> >> LICENSE files. - NOTICE good. - All source files have Apache
> >> headers - No unexpected binary file in source release (but see
> >> below) - can compile from source - test pass
> >>
> >> I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source release, I
> >> assume you have permission from the person who took them to use
> >> these? IF so you may want to put that in the LICENSE.
> >>
> >> There's a number of binary file without extensions in
> >> /thumbnail_patterns/ but they all look to be PNGs is this the case?
> >> Where did these images come from?
> >>
> >> I had a quick look at the binary release and the LICENCE and NOTICE
> >> appear comprehensive. I didn;t do a though check. I did notice that
> >> the year is incorrect in the NOTICE file and LICENSE appendix has
> >> the same issue. It’s actually wrong here as non ASF Apache
> >> licensed software is mentioned. There no need to mean Apache
> >> licensed software in the LICENCE but no harm is done by donning so.
> >> [2]
> >>
> >> Thanks, Justin
> >>
> >> 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
> >> 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>
> >>
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >>
> >
> > - --
> > Ian Dunlop, eScience Lab
> > School of Computer Science
> > The University of Manchester
> > http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7066-3350
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> > Version: GnuPG v2
> >
> > iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWPL6FAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5agYH/3yPH2vLCltvOqIZlv70TJ9R
> > EmdbRL6rvpJjcah+GH9BPpsYEeENXw5WTARH42RVZT4gFUz62GBIkZhhqFks0/qx
> > ubL+bekcivMI2P/eZ3T6S/mKw52d8esRaDvrMKaUZ3Ax3tdkYt/dPaYoXGxAMNS4
> > 5IolSgvMaTT2qKlcx0fmCh+gdfmxHFo0ZTvZ55V9ucnmsvQY8orGqZt7SJ+jdySz
> > vp9AIvnxStMCorZ8tKSLDVo1H+ciQOXxCZWymFlAlm7nQAw5KoLQYMp/OBUrw6Lk
> > urdolruKU7YGgdwh5uV8WHi+cCfpIyQIRaIz8nFlXYTFx/VL8Dm7vrgFpcH1jyw=
> > =d5Aa
> > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by Ali Lown <al...@lown.me.uk>.
Hi Ian,
I am not sure about the best way to import this into eclipse, I have
always used the CLI tools directly. I have CC'd the dev-list in case
they have a better answer for you.
The inability to find ${build.classpath.path}, ${build.macros.path}
suggests that you are missing/failed-to-import/failed-to-reference the
build.properties file which contains the values for these macros.
The follow-up problem about missing define-gxpc is to be expected
because of the above problem resulting in it not importing
build-macros.xml, which defines "define-gxpc" amongst other things.
Ali
On 6 November 2015 at 14:51, Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> Hello,
>
> I'll give it at 0 the moment since I encountered a build issue. I
> downloaded the src zip and imported the code into Eclipse Mars (4.50)
> with jdk 1.7.0_79 & ANT 1.9.4 but found the following issues:
>
> 1)
> BUILD FAILED
> C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:28: Cannot find
> C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\${build.classpath.path} imported
> from C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml
>
> Resolved by commenting out
>
> <import file="${build.classpath.path}"/>
>
> <!-- Import macros -->
> <import file="${build.macros.path}"/>
>
> and tried again
>
> 2)
>
> BUILD FAILED
> Target "define-gxpc" does not exist in the project "waveinabox". It is
> used from target "gen-gxp".
>
> Resolved by removing define-gxpc from
>
> <target name="gen-gxp" description="Generates GXP files"
> depends="init, define-gxpc, gen-gxp-dep" unless="skip.gen-gxp">
> <gxpc srcdir="${src.dir}" srcpaths="${src.dir}"
> destdir="${gen.dir}/gxp"
> target="org.waveprotocol.box.server.gxp" />
> <touch file="${dep}/gen-gxp"/>
> </target>
>
> 3)
>
> BUILD FAILED
> C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:120: Problem: failed
> to create task or type buildproto
> Cause: The name is undefined.
> Action: Check the spelling.
> Action: Check that any custom tasks/types have been declared.
> Action: Check that any <presetdef>/<macrodef> declarations have taken
> place.
>
> At that point I figured it best to report the issues here:
>
> Is there a procedure for building in eclipse, am I missing an ant
> setting somewhere?
>
> So, apart fromn the compile issue everything else looks good:
>
> signatures are good
> artifact/hashes good
> DISCLAIMER OK
> LICENCE OK
> NOTICE OK
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ian
>
>
>
> On 04/11/2015 07:14, Justin Mclean wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> +1 binding.
>>
>> Could you please fix the LICENCE Appendix in the next release. The
>> text should be "Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]” not
>> "Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation”.
>>
>> I checked: - artefact has incubating in name - signatures and
>> hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE has minor issue with the
>> copyright in the appendix. Not required but it could also use the
>> sort form in LICENSE [1] particularly as you bundle the software
>> LICENSE files. - NOTICE good. - All source files have Apache
>> headers - No unexpected binary file in source release (but see
>> below) - can compile from source - test pass
>>
>> I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source release, I
>> assume you have permission from the person who took them to use
>> these? IF so you may want to put that in the LICENSE.
>>
>> There's a number of binary file without extensions in
>> /thumbnail_patterns/ but they all look to be PNGs is this the case?
>> Where did these images come from?
>>
>> I had a quick look at the binary release and the LICENCE and NOTICE
>> appear comprehensive. I didn;t do a though check. I did notice that
>> the year is incorrect in the NOTICE file and LICENSE appendix has
>> the same issue. It’s actually wrong here as non ASF Apache
>> licensed software is mentioned. There no need to mean Apache
>> licensed software in the LICENCE but no harm is done by donning so.
>> [2]
>>
>> Thanks, Justin
>>
>> 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
>> 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
>>
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>>
>
> - --
> Ian Dunlop, eScience Lab
> School of Computer Science
> The University of Manchester
> http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7066-3350
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2
>
> iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWPL6FAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5agYH/3yPH2vLCltvOqIZlv70TJ9R
> EmdbRL6rvpJjcah+GH9BPpsYEeENXw5WTARH42RVZT4gFUz62GBIkZhhqFks0/qx
> ubL+bekcivMI2P/eZ3T6S/mKw52d8esRaDvrMKaUZ3Ax3tdkYt/dPaYoXGxAMNS4
> 5IolSgvMaTT2qKlcx0fmCh+gdfmxHFo0ZTvZ55V9ucnmsvQY8orGqZt7SJ+jdySz
> vp9AIvnxStMCorZ8tKSLDVo1H+ciQOXxCZWymFlAlm7nQAw5KoLQYMp/OBUrw6Lk
> urdolruKU7YGgdwh5uV8WHi+cCfpIyQIRaIz8nFlXYTFx/VL8Dm7vrgFpcH1jyw=
> =d5Aa
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by Ian Dunlop <ia...@manchester.ac.uk>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
Hello,
I'll give it at 0 the moment since I encountered a build issue. I
downloaded the src zip and imported the code into Eclipse Mars (4.50)
with jdk 1.7.0_79 & ANT 1.9.4 but found the following issues:
1)
BUILD FAILED
C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:28: Cannot find
C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\${build.classpath.path} imported
from C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml
Resolved by commenting out
<import file="${build.classpath.path}"/>
<!-- Import macros -->
<import file="${build.macros.path}"/>
and tried again
2)
BUILD FAILED
Target "define-gxpc" does not exist in the project "waveinabox". It is
used from target "gen-gxp".
Resolved by removing define-gxpc from
<target name="gen-gxp" description="Generates GXP files"
depends="init, define-gxpc, gen-gxp-dep" unless="skip.gen-gxp">
<gxpc srcdir="${src.dir}" srcpaths="${src.dir}"
destdir="${gen.dir}/gxp"
target="org.waveprotocol.box.server.gxp" />
<touch file="${dep}/gen-gxp"/>
</target>
3)
BUILD FAILED
C:\Users\idunlop\workspace\waveinabox\build.xml:120: Problem: failed
to create task or type buildproto
Cause: The name is undefined.
Action: Check the spelling.
Action: Check that any custom tasks/types have been declared.
Action: Check that any <presetdef>/<macrodef> declarations have taken
place.
At that point I figured it best to report the issues here:
Is there a procedure for building in eclipse, am I missing an ant
setting somewhere?
So, apart fromn the compile issue everything else looks good:
signatures are good
artifact/hashes good
DISCLAIMER OK
LICENCE OK
NOTICE OK
Cheers,
Ian
On 04/11/2015 07:14, Justin Mclean wrote:
> Hi,
>
> +1 binding.
>
> Could you please fix the LICENCE Appendix in the next release. The
> text should be "Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]” not
> "Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation”.
>
> I checked: - artefact has incubating in name - signatures and
> hashes good - DISCLAIMER exists - LICENSE has minor issue with the
> copyright in the appendix. Not required but it could also use the
> sort form in LICENSE [1] particularly as you bundle the software
> LICENSE files. - NOTICE good. - All source files have Apache
> headers - No unexpected binary file in source release (but see
> below) - can compile from source - test pass
>
> I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source release, I
> assume you have permission from the person who took them to use
> these? IF so you may want to put that in the LICENSE.
>
> There's a number of binary file without extensions in
> /thumbnail_patterns/ but they all look to be PNGs is this the case?
> Where did these images come from?
>
> I had a quick look at the binary release and the LICENCE and NOTICE
> appear comprehensive. I didn;t do a though check. I did notice that
> the year is incorrect in the NOTICE file and LICENSE appendix has
> the same issue. It’s actually wrong here as non ASF Apache
> licensed software is mentioned. There no need to mean Apache
> licensed software in the LICENCE but no harm is done by donning so.
> [2]
>
> Thanks, Justin
>
> 1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
> 2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
- --
Ian Dunlop, eScience Lab
School of Computer Science
The University of Manchester
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7066-3350
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJWPL6FAAoJEPK45GBX+Cy5agYH/3yPH2vLCltvOqIZlv70TJ9R
EmdbRL6rvpJjcah+GH9BPpsYEeENXw5WTARH42RVZT4gFUz62GBIkZhhqFks0/qx
ubL+bekcivMI2P/eZ3T6S/mKw52d8esRaDvrMKaUZ3Ax3tdkYt/dPaYoXGxAMNS4
5IolSgvMaTT2qKlcx0fmCh+gdfmxHFo0ZTvZ55V9ucnmsvQY8orGqZt7SJ+jdySz
vp9AIvnxStMCorZ8tKSLDVo1H+ciQOXxCZWymFlAlm7nQAw5KoLQYMp/OBUrw6Lk
urdolruKU7YGgdwh5uV8WHi+cCfpIyQIRaIz8nFlXYTFx/VL8Dm7vrgFpcH1jyw=
=d5Aa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
+1 binding.
Could you please fix the LICENCE Appendix in the next release. The text should be "Copyright [yyyy] [name of copyright owner]” not "Copyright 2013 The Apache Software Foundation”.
I checked:
- artefact has incubating in name
- signatures and hashes good
- DISCLAIMER exists
- LICENSE has minor issue with the copyright in the appendix. Not required but it could also use the sort form in LICENSE [1] particularly as you bundle the software LICENSE files.
- NOTICE good.
- All source files have Apache headers
- No unexpected binary file in source release (but see below)
- can compile from source
- test pass
I notice there’s a couple of photographs in the source release, I assume you have permission from the person who took them to use these? IF so you may want to put that in the LICENSE.
There's a number of binary file without extensions in /thumbnail_patterns/ but they all look to be PNGs is this the case? Where did these images come from?
I had a quick look at the binary release and the LICENCE and NOTICE appear comprehensive. I didn;t do a though check. I did notice that the year is incorrect in the NOTICE file and LICENSE appendix has the same issue. It’s actually wrong here as non ASF Apache licensed software is mentioned. There no need to mean Apache licensed software in the LICENCE but no harm is done by donning so. [2]
Thanks,
Justin
1. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#permissive-deps
2. http://www.apache.org/dev/licensing-howto.html#alv2-dep
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by Henry Saputra <he...@gmail.com>.
LICENSE file looks good
NOTICE file looks good
DISCLAIMER file exists
Signature file looks good
Hash files look good
+1 (binding)
Small nit, the NOTICE file seemed to have need the year to be updated.
- Henry
On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 2:32 PM, Andreas Kotes <co...@flatline.de>
wrote:
> Hello esteemed PPMCs,
>
> is there something you need for Apache Wave to get some more traction on
> this mailinglist?
>
> Right now this is kinda blocking here, while we're toiling along inside
> the project ;)
>
> Please consider investing a modest amount of time to get this through
> the door.
>
> The really short documentation for an install can be found on
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Install+WIAB
>
> Thank you for your consideration,
>
> count
>
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 02:26:37PM +0000, Yuri Z wrote:
> > +1 binding from Justin Mclean
> > +1 from Ian Dunlop
> > +1 binding from John D. Ament
> >
> > Unless I missed someone we still need +1 binding.
>
> [..]
>
> > >> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM Ali Lown <al...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> > >> > Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to
> make
> > >> > its first release since joining the incubator in 2010.
>
> [..]
>
> > >> > The Wave PPMC has voted in favour with 6 binding votes, and 4
> > >> > non-binding votes from the community.
> > >> >
> > >> > PPMC vote call:
> > >> >
> > >>
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCABRGrVdhdhhdRMwJ9jsWxzqMX9ijzgG%3Di5BF1YJBAZ2juYFORg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >> >
> > >> > PPMC vote result (second result after a slow start for the first
> > >> attempt):
> > >> >
> > >>
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> > >> >
> > >> > Staging directory:
> > >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/
> > >> >
> > >> > Please note that
> > >> > - checksums are generated from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha'
> > >> > - .zip versions are generated from the .tar.bz2 version by repacking
> > >> > - binary artifacts are provided for convenience of the end-user, the
> > >> > vote is primarily regarding the source artifacts
> > >> >
> > >> > Git branch:
> > >> >
> > >>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-rc10
> > >> >
> > >> > KEYS file:
> > >> >
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/KEYS
> > >> >
> > >> > Please verify the release and vote. This vote will close after 72
> > >> > hours on 6th November.
> > >> >
> > >> > [] +1: I approve
> > >> > [] -1: I disapprove because...
> > >> >
> > >> > Please add (binding) if your vote is binding.
>
> --
> Andreas 'count' Kotes
> Taming computers for humans since 1990.
> "Don't ask what the world needs. Ask what makes you come alive, and go do
> it.
> Because what the world needs is people who have come alive." -- Howard
> Thurman
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
[VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by Yuri Z <ve...@gmail.com>.
The vote concluded with +4 (+3 binding)
+1 binding from Justin Mclean
+1 from Ian Dunlop
+1 binding from John D. Ament
+1 binding from Jean-Baptiste Onofré
On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 3:23 PM Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net> wrote:
> +1 (binding)
>
> LICENSE is OK
> NOTICE looks good (I'm really careful now on this file, so, I'm 100%
> sure ;))
> DISCLAIMER exists
>
> Regards
> JB
>
> On 02/01/2016 11:32 PM, Andreas Kotes wrote:
> > Hello esteemed PPMCs,
> >
> > is there something you need for Apache Wave to get some more traction on
> > this mailinglist?
> >
> > Right now this is kinda blocking here, while we're toiling along inside
> > the project ;)
> >
> > Please consider investing a modest amount of time to get this through
> > the door.
> >
> > The really short documentation for an install can be found on
> > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Install+WIAB
> >
> > Thank you for your consideration,
> >
> > count
> >
> > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 02:26:37PM +0000, Yuri Z wrote:
> >> +1 binding from Justin Mclean
> >> +1 from Ian Dunlop
> >> +1 binding from John D. Ament
> >>
> >> Unless I missed someone we still need +1 binding.
> >
> > [..]
> >
> >>>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM Ali Lown <al...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> >>>>> Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to
> make
> >>>>> its first release since joining the incubator in 2010.
> >
> > [..]
> >
> >>>>> The Wave PPMC has voted in favour with 6 binding votes, and 4
> >>>>> non-binding votes from the community.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> PPMC vote call:
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCABRGrVdhdhhdRMwJ9jsWxzqMX9ijzgG%3Di5BF1YJBAZ2juYFORg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >>>>>
> >>>>> PPMC vote result (second result after a slow start for the first
> >>>> attempt):
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Staging directory:
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please note that
> >>>>> - checksums are generated from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha'
> >>>>> - .zip versions are generated from the .tar.bz2 version by repacking
> >>>>> - binary artifacts are provided for convenience of the end-user, the
> >>>>> vote is primarily regarding the source artifacts
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Git branch:
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-rc10
> >>>>>
> >>>>> KEYS file:
> >>>>>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/KEYS
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please verify the release and vote. This vote will close after 72
> >>>>> hours on 6th November.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> [] +1: I approve
> >>>>> [] -1: I disapprove because...
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please add (binding) if your vote is binding.
> >
>
> --
> Jean-Baptiste Onofré
> jbonofre@apache.org
> http://blog.nanthrax.net
> Talend - http://www.talend.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by Jean-Baptiste Onofré <jb...@nanthrax.net>.
+1 (binding)
LICENSE is OK
NOTICE looks good (I'm really careful now on this file, so, I'm 100%
sure ;))
DISCLAIMER exists
Regards
JB
On 02/01/2016 11:32 PM, Andreas Kotes wrote:
> Hello esteemed PPMCs,
>
> is there something you need for Apache Wave to get some more traction on
> this mailinglist?
>
> Right now this is kinda blocking here, while we're toiling along inside
> the project ;)
>
> Please consider investing a modest amount of time to get this through
> the door.
>
> The really short documentation for an install can be found on
> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Install+WIAB
>
> Thank you for your consideration,
>
> count
>
> On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 02:26:37PM +0000, Yuri Z wrote:
>> +1 binding from Justin Mclean
>> +1 from Ian Dunlop
>> +1 binding from John D. Ament
>>
>> Unless I missed someone we still need +1 binding.
>
> [..]
>
>>>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM Ali Lown <al...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>>>>> Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to make
>>>>> its first release since joining the incubator in 2010.
>
> [..]
>
>>>>> The Wave PPMC has voted in favour with 6 binding votes, and 4
>>>>> non-binding votes from the community.
>>>>>
>>>>> PPMC vote call:
>>>>>
>>>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCABRGrVdhdhhdRMwJ9jsWxzqMX9ijzgG%3Di5BF1YJBAZ2juYFORg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>>>>
>>>>> PPMC vote result (second result after a slow start for the first
>>>> attempt):
>>>>>
>>>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>>>>
>>>>> Staging directory:
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/
>>>>>
>>>>> Please note that
>>>>> - checksums are generated from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha'
>>>>> - .zip versions are generated from the .tar.bz2 version by repacking
>>>>> - binary artifacts are provided for convenience of the end-user, the
>>>>> vote is primarily regarding the source artifacts
>>>>>
>>>>> Git branch:
>>>>>
>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-rc10
>>>>>
>>>>> KEYS file:
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/KEYS
>>>>>
>>>>> Please verify the release and vote. This vote will close after 72
>>>>> hours on 6th November.
>>>>>
>>>>> [] +1: I approve
>>>>> [] -1: I disapprove because...
>>>>>
>>>>> Please add (binding) if your vote is binding.
>
--
Jean-Baptiste Onofré
jbonofre@apache.org
http://blog.nanthrax.net
Talend - http://www.talend.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by Andreas Kotes <co...@flatline.de>.
Hello esteemed PPMCs,
is there something you need for Apache Wave to get some more traction on
this mailinglist?
Right now this is kinda blocking here, while we're toiling along inside
the project ;)
Please consider investing a modest amount of time to get this through
the door.
The really short documentation for an install can be found on
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Install+WIAB
Thank you for your consideration,
count
On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 02:26:37PM +0000, Yuri Z wrote:
> +1 binding from Justin Mclean
> +1 from Ian Dunlop
> +1 binding from John D. Ament
>
> Unless I missed someone we still need +1 binding.
[..]
> >> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM Ali Lown <al...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> >> > Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to make
> >> > its first release since joining the incubator in 2010.
[..]
> >> > The Wave PPMC has voted in favour with 6 binding votes, and 4
> >> > non-binding votes from the community.
> >> >
> >> > PPMC vote call:
> >> >
> >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCABRGrVdhdhhdRMwJ9jsWxzqMX9ijzgG%3Di5BF1YJBAZ2juYFORg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >> >
> >> > PPMC vote result (second result after a slow start for the first
> >> attempt):
> >> >
> >> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >> >
> >> > Staging directory:
> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/
> >> >
> >> > Please note that
> >> > - checksums are generated from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha'
> >> > - .zip versions are generated from the .tar.bz2 version by repacking
> >> > - binary artifacts are provided for convenience of the end-user, the
> >> > vote is primarily regarding the source artifacts
> >> >
> >> > Git branch:
> >> >
> >> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-rc10
> >> >
> >> > KEYS file:
> >> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/KEYS
> >> >
> >> > Please verify the release and vote. This vote will close after 72
> >> > hours on 6th November.
> >> >
> >> > [] +1: I approve
> >> > [] -1: I disapprove because...
> >> >
> >> > Please add (binding) if your vote is binding.
--
Andreas 'count' Kotes
Taming computers for humans since 1990.
"Don't ask what the world needs. Ask what makes you come alive, and go do it.
Because what the world needs is people who have come alive." -- Howard Thurman
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by Yuri Z <ve...@gmail.com>.
So far we got:
+1 binding from Justin Mclean
+1 from Ian Dunlop
+1 binding from John D. Ament
Unless I missed someone we still need +1 binding.
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:58 AM Yuri Z <ve...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:10 AM John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> I'm unable to compile/run due to some of the issues noted by ian, just
>> that
>> I'm not as willing to install older java versions to make it work.
>>
>> Anyways, it seems like some of these issues are alleviated in your master
>> branch, so.... (to break Marvin's heart a little :-)
>>
>> +1 (binding)
>>
>> Release contents look good, with the notes from Justin.
>>
>> John
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM Ali Lown <al...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>>
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to make
>> > its first release since joining the incubator in 2010.
>> >
>> > The Wave PPMC has voted in favour with 6 binding votes, and 4
>> > non-binding votes from the community.
>> >
>> > PPMC vote call:
>> >
>> >
>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCABRGrVdhdhhdRMwJ9jsWxzqMX9ijzgG%3Di5BF1YJBAZ2juYFORg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>> >
>> > PPMC vote result (second result after a slow start for the first
>> attempt):
>> >
>> >
>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>> >
>> > Staging directory:
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/
>> >
>> > Please note that
>> > - checksums are generated from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha'
>> > - .zip versions are generated from the .tar.bz2 version by repacking
>> > - binary artifacts are provided for convenience of the end-user, the
>> > vote is primarily regarding the source artifacts
>> >
>> > Git branch:
>> >
>> >
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-rc10
>> >
>> > KEYS file:
>> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/KEYS
>> >
>> > Please verify the release and vote. This vote will close after 72
>> > hours on 6th November.
>> >
>> > [] +1: I approve
>> > [] -1: I disapprove because...
>> >
>> > Please add (binding) if your vote is binding.
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Ali
>> >
>> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
>> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>> >
>> >
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by Yuri Z <ve...@gmail.com>.
Thanks!
On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:10 AM John D. Ament <jo...@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm unable to compile/run due to some of the issues noted by ian, just that
> I'm not as willing to install older java versions to make it work.
>
> Anyways, it seems like some of these issues are alleviated in your master
> branch, so.... (to break Marvin's heart a little :-)
>
> +1 (binding)
>
> Release contents look good, with the notes from Justin.
>
> John
>
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM Ali Lown <al...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to make
> > its first release since joining the incubator in 2010.
> >
> > The Wave PPMC has voted in favour with 6 binding votes, and 4
> > non-binding votes from the community.
> >
> > PPMC vote call:
> >
> >
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCABRGrVdhdhhdRMwJ9jsWxzqMX9ijzgG%3Di5BF1YJBAZ2juYFORg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > PPMC vote result (second result after a slow start for the first
> attempt):
> >
> >
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
> >
> > Staging directory:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/
> >
> > Please note that
> > - checksums are generated from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha'
> > - .zip versions are generated from the .tar.bz2 version by repacking
> > - binary artifacts are provided for convenience of the end-user, the
> > vote is primarily regarding the source artifacts
> >
> > Git branch:
> >
> >
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-rc10
> >
> > KEYS file:
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/KEYS
> >
> > Please verify the release and vote. This vote will close after 72
> > hours on 6th November.
> >
> > [] +1: I approve
> > [] -1: I disapprove because...
> >
> > Please add (binding) if your vote is binding.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ali
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by "John D. Ament" <jo...@apache.org>.
I'm unable to compile/run due to some of the issues noted by ian, just that
I'm not as willing to install older java versions to make it work.
Anyways, it seems like some of these issues are alleviated in your master
branch, so.... (to break Marvin's heart a little :-)
+1 (binding)
Release contents look good, with the notes from Justin.
John
On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 11:10 AM Ali Lown <al...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to make
> its first release since joining the incubator in 2010.
>
> The Wave PPMC has voted in favour with 6 binding votes, and 4
> non-binding votes from the community.
>
> PPMC vote call:
>
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCABRGrVdhdhhdRMwJ9jsWxzqMX9ijzgG%3Di5BF1YJBAZ2juYFORg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> PPMC vote result (second result after a slow start for the first attempt):
>
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> Staging directory:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/
>
> Please note that
> - checksums are generated from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha'
> - .zip versions are generated from the .tar.bz2 version by repacking
> - binary artifacts are provided for convenience of the end-user, the
> vote is primarily regarding the source artifacts
>
> Git branch:
>
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-rc10
>
> KEYS file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/KEYS
>
> Please verify the release and vote. This vote will close after 72
> hours on 6th November.
>
> [] +1: I approve
> [] -1: I disapprove because...
>
> Please add (binding) if your vote is binding.
>
> Thanks,
> Ali
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
Can any other IPMC member help out here?
Thanks,
Justin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by Ali Lown <al...@lown.me.uk>.
Bump. I could still do with another vote from an IPMC member.
Thanks,
Ali
On 12 November 2015 at 16:02, Ali Lown <al...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I could still do with someone else taking a look at these artifacts.
>
> Currently there is one +1 vote from Justin Mclean, and one +1 vote
> from Christian Grobmeier that can be forwarded from the wave-dev list.
>
> My understanding is that I require at least 3 binding +1's from IPMC.
>
> Thanks,
> Ali
>
> On 3 November 2015 at 16:09, Ali Lown <al...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to make
>> its first release since joining the incubator in 2010.
>>
>> The Wave PPMC has voted in favour with 6 binding votes, and 4
>> non-binding votes from the community.
>>
>> PPMC vote call:
>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCABRGrVdhdhhdRMwJ9jsWxzqMX9ijzgG%3Di5BF1YJBAZ2juYFORg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>
>> PPMC vote result (second result after a slow start for the first attempt):
>> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>>
>> Staging directory:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/
>>
>> Please note that
>> - checksums are generated from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha'
>> - .zip versions are generated from the .tar.bz2 version by repacking
>> - binary artifacts are provided for convenience of the end-user, the
>> vote is primarily regarding the source artifacts
>>
>> Git branch:
>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-rc10
>>
>> KEYS file:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/KEYS
>>
>> Please verify the release and vote. This vote will close after 72
>> hours on 6th November.
>>
>> [] +1: I approve
>> [] -1: I disapprove because...
>>
>> Please add (binding) if your vote is binding.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Ali
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)
Posted by Ali Lown <al...@lown.me.uk>.
Hi all,
I could still do with someone else taking a look at these artifacts.
Currently there is one +1 vote from Justin Mclean, and one +1 vote
from Christian Grobmeier that can be forwarded from the wave-dev list.
My understanding is that I require at least 3 binding +1's from IPMC.
Thanks,
Ali
On 3 November 2015 at 16:09, Ali Lown <al...@lown.me.uk> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wave has just completed its first passing vote, and would like to make
> its first release since joining the incubator in 2010.
>
> The Wave PPMC has voted in favour with 6 binding votes, and 4
> non-binding votes from the community.
>
> PPMC vote call:
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201510.mbox/%3CCABRGrVdhdhhdRMwJ9jsWxzqMX9ijzgG%3Di5BF1YJBAZ2juYFORg%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> PPMC vote result (second result after a slow start for the first attempt):
> https://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/incubator-wave-dev/201511.mbox/%3CCABRGrVenajwQPBw98Zy99UqrMNNQMJ-X5tGcWWAMR3xNX%2Bnu7w%40mail.gmail.com%3E
>
> Staging directory:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/
>
> Please note that
> - checksums are generated from 'gpg --print-md SHA512 $f > $f.sha'
> - .zip versions are generated from the .tar.bz2 version by repacking
> - binary artifacts are provided for convenience of the end-user, the
> vote is primarily regarding the source artifacts
>
> Git branch:
> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=incubator-wave.git;a=shortlog;h=refs/heads/0.4.0-rc10
>
> KEYS file:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/incubator/wave/0.4.0-rc10/KEYS
>
> Please verify the release and vote. This vote will close after 72
> hours on 6th November.
>
> [] +1: I approve
> [] -1: I disapprove because...
>
> Please add (binding) if your vote is binding.
>
> Thanks,
> Ali
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: general-unsubscribe@incubator.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: general-help@incubator.apache.org