You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@cassandra.apache.org by Dimitry Lvovsky <di...@reviewpro.com> on 2010/07/19 11:55:45 UTC
Suggestion for the storage.conf
I think it would be a good idea to add a bit more explanation
storage-conf.xml/wiki regarding the replication factor. It caused some
confusion until we dug around the mail archive to realize that our
UnavailableExceptions were caused by our incorrect assumption and that RF=1
does NOT mean that this nodes data will be replicated to one another node --
but rather the data will only exist in one node :-s.
--
Dimitry Lvovsky
ReviewPro
www.reviewpro.com
Re: Suggestion for the storage.conf
Posted by Dimitry Lvovsky <di...@reviewpro.com>.
Thanks ;-).
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 5:55 PM, Dave Viner <da...@pobox.com> wrote:
> Added: http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/StorageConfiguration
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Dimitry Lvovsky <di...@reviewpro.com>wrote:
>
>> I think it would be a good idea to add a bit more explanation
>> storage-conf.xml/wiki regarding the replication factor. It caused some
>> confusion until we dug around the mail archive to realize that our
>> UnavailableExceptions were caused by our incorrect assumption and that RF=1
>> does NOT mean that this nodes data will be replicated to one another node --
>> but rather the data will only exist in one node :-s.
>>
>>
>> --
>> Dimitry Lvovsky
>> ReviewPro
>> www.reviewpro.com
>>
>>
>
--
Dimitry Lvovsky
Director of Engineering
ReviewPro
www.reviewpro.com
+34 616 337 103
Re: Suggestion for the storage.conf
Posted by Dave Viner <da...@pobox.com>.
Added: http://wiki.apache.org/cassandra/StorageConfiguration
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 2:55 AM, Dimitry Lvovsky <di...@reviewpro.com>wrote:
> I think it would be a good idea to add a bit more explanation
> storage-conf.xml/wiki regarding the replication factor. It caused some
> confusion until we dug around the mail archive to realize that our
> UnavailableExceptions were caused by our incorrect assumption and that RF=1
> does NOT mean that this nodes data will be replicated to one another node --
> but rather the data will only exist in one node :-s.
>
>
> --
> Dimitry Lvovsky
> ReviewPro
> www.reviewpro.com
>
>