You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@hbase.apache.org by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> on 2009/09/26 02:06:03 UTC
HBase 0.22 -> HBase 1.0
It looks like Hadoop is planning to bump to 1.0 after 0.22, and are considering an API freeze at 0.21.
- Andy
Re: HBase 0.22 -> HBase 1.0
Posted by Ryan Rawson <ry...@gmail.com>.
Futhermore, I'm waiting with bated breath for a nonversioned rpc for hadoop.
On Sep 26, 2009 3:20 PM, "Andrew Purtell" <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
No, Stack was talking about Hadoop's API freeze. The main reason why HBase
has been hitched to Hadoop's versioning thus far is that each Hadoop
version's API is incompatible with the previous in some significant way (to
HBase). It would be great to move beyond that.
- Andy
________________________________
From: Bruce Williams <wi...@gmail.com>
To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 3:10:51 PM
Subject: Re: HBase 0.22 -> HBase 1.0
Are you saying we should consider freezing the API also? Bruce On Sat, Sep
26, 2009 at 8:54 AM, s...
Re: HBase 0.22 -> HBase 1.0
Posted by Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org>.
No, Stack was talking about Hadoop's API freeze. The main reason why HBase has been hitched to Hadoop's versioning thus far is that each Hadoop version's API is incompatible with the previous in some significant way (to HBase). It would be great to move beyond that.
- Andy
________________________________
From: Bruce Williams <wi...@gmail.com>
To: hbase-dev@hadoop.apache.org
Sent: Saturday, September 26, 2009 3:10:51 PM
Subject: Re: HBase 0.22 -> HBase 1.0
Are you saying we should consider freezing the API also?
Bruce
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 8:54 AM, stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> I do not know any reason for not trying to do like hadoop. After hadoop
> 1.0, presuming the API stays constant, we might be able to unhitch ourselves
> from hadoop's versioning.
> St.Ack
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> It looks like Hadoop is planning to bump to 1.0 after 0.22, and are
>> considering an API freeze at 0.21.
>>
>> - Andy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
--
“Discovering...discovering...we will never cease discovering...
and the end of all our discovering will be
to return to the place where we began
and to know it for the first time.”
-T.S. Eliot
Re: HBase 0.22 -> HBase 1.0
Posted by Bruce Williams <wi...@gmail.com>.
Are you saying we should consider freezing the API also?
Bruce
On Sat, Sep 26, 2009 at 8:54 AM, stack <st...@duboce.net> wrote:
> I do not know any reason for not trying to do like hadoop. After hadoop
> 1.0, presuming the API stays constant, we might be able to unhitch ourselves
> from hadoop's versioning.
> St.Ack
>
> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> It looks like Hadoop is planning to bump to 1.0 after 0.22, and are
>> considering an API freeze at 0.21.
>>
>> - Andy
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
--
“Discovering...discovering...we will never cease discovering...
and the end of all our discovering will be
to return to the place where we began
and to know it for the first time.”
-T.S. Eliot
Re: HBase 0.22 -> HBase 1.0
Posted by stack <st...@duboce.net>.
I do not know any reason for not trying to do like hadoop. After hadoop
1.0, presuming the API stays constant, we might be able to unhitch ourselves
from hadoop's versioning.
St.Ack
On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 5:06 PM, Andrew Purtell <ap...@apache.org> wrote:
> It looks like Hadoop is planning to bump to 1.0 after 0.22, and are
> considering an API freeze at 0.21.
>
> - Andy
>
>
>
>