You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@jackrabbit.apache.org by Julian Reschke <ju...@gmx.de> on 2006/10/26 16:24:32 UTC

SPI: question on QPropertyDefinition.getValueConstraints()/getDefaultValues()

Hi,

it seems that constraints and values that are NAMEs in JCR are supposed 
to be expanded names (suitable for QName.valueOf()) in SPI. Is this 
correct? If yes, shouldn't the descriptions in the JavaDoc spell that out?

Best regards, Julian

Re: SPI: question on QPropertyDefinition.getValueConstraints()/getDefaultValues()

Posted by Angela Schreiber <an...@day.com>.

hallo julian

yes, everything everywhere qualified
yes, but actually this doesn't have very high prio for me
currently. i'd prefer to get a more or less stable api
first... this is not yet the case.

regards
angela

Julian Reschke wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> it seems that constraints and values that are NAMEs in JCR are supposed 
> to be expanded names (suitable for QName.valueOf()) in SPI. Is this 
> correct? If yes, shouldn't the descriptions in the JavaDoc spell that out?
> 
> Best regards, Julian