You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cocoon.apache.org by bu...@apache.org on 2004/08/27 00:04:29 UTC
DO NOT REPLY [Bug 30874] -
SQLTransformer throws exception with stored procs on Sybase
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
<http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30874>.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30874
SQLTransformer throws exception with stored procs on Sybase
------- Additional Comments From ats37@hotmail.com 2004-08-26 22:04 -------
The obvious (and trivial) fix, of course, is to replace
if ( pst != null )
pst.close();
pst = null; // Prevent using pst again.
if ( cst != null )
cst.close();
cst = null; // Prevent using cst again.
with
if ( pst != null && pst != cst )
pst.close();
pst = null; // Prevent using pst again.
if ( cst != null )
cst.close();
cst = null; // Prevent using cst again.
without any risk of breaking anything, if for some reason both of them are ever
(legitimately) used and different (which I doubt).
I'd offer to upload a patch, but for 14 characters it hardly seems worth it ;-)