You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Randy Terbush <ra...@zyzzyva.com> on 1997/07/22 00:58:20 UTC

Re: Unified diffs

FTR - I cannot say that I agree. Context diffs make much more sense 
to me in more situations than the Uni.  I'm +1 for context diffs.


> Well, I concede. I decided a few weeks ago to try unified diffs instead
> of context diffs, even though I believed context diffs superior. In that
> time, I've been convinced that unified diffs are, in fact, the better
> diff. I notice that most other people on the list seem to feel this way
> as well.
> 
> Should we take votes on whether or not to replace the context diffs in
> the apache-cvs mailings with unified diffs?
> 
> -- Alexei Kosut <ak...@organic.com>

Re: Unified diffs

Posted by Alexei Kosut <ak...@organic.com>.

On Mon, 21 Jul 1997, Randy Terbush wrote:

> FTR - I cannot say that I agree. Context diffs make much more sense 
> to me in more situations than the Uni.  I'm +1 for context diffs.

I agree that unidiffs and context diffs both have their places. Maybe we
should modify the commit-mail script to ask the commiter which they
perfer... Or maybe not.

-- Alexei Kosut <ak...@organic.com>