You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to common-dev@hadoop.apache.org by "Owen O'Malley (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2006/11/01 23:22:18 UTC

[jira] Updated: (HADOOP-629) none of the rpc servers check the protcol name for validity

     [ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-629?page=all ]

Owen O'Malley updated HADOOP-629:
---------------------------------

    Fix Version/s: 0.9.0
                       (was: 0.8.0)

> none of the rpc servers check the protcol name for validity
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: HADOOP-629
>                 URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HADOOP-629
>             Project: Hadoop
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: ipc
>    Affects Versions: 0.7.2
>            Reporter: Owen O'Malley
>         Assigned To: Wendy Chien
>             Fix For: 0.9.0
>
>
> All of the Hadoop RPC servers either ignore the protocol name or do:
> if (protocol.equals(Prot1.class.getName()) {
>   return Prot1.versionId;
> } else {
>   return Prot2.versionId;
> }
> A much better structure would be:
> if (Prot1.class.getName().equals(protocol)) {
>   return Prot1.versionId;
> } else if (Prot2.class.getName().equals(protocol)) {
>   return Prot2.versionId;
> } else {
>   throw new VersionMismatchException("Expected protocol Prot1 or Prot2 and received: " + protocol);
> }

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
If you think it was sent incorrectly contact one of the administrators: http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Administrators.jspa
-
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira