You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@isis.apache.org by Vladimir Nišević <vn...@gmail.com> on 2015/02/20 11:37:57 UTC
Experience with upgrade our application to 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT
Hi guys, first of all, great work in the upcoming version!
We are currently using 1.7.0 in production and planning to upgrade to 1.8.0
- since it solves some othes our issues .
Here some first experience we've made with 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT. My approach is
usually to checkout the latest simpleapp, run it locally based on that
experience adapt e.g. maven dependencies, new settings in our application
that works with 1.7.0
We also use simpleapp when trying to reproduce our issues.
First experience I've made when launching the naked simpleapp-webapp using
eclipse IDE with provided .launch config, is that isis does not recognize
any persistent classes and I get next error
################################################ ISIS METAMODEL VALIDATION
ERRORS ################################################################
No @PersistenceCapable entities found. (Are the entities referenced by the
registered services? are all services registered? did the DataNucleus
enhancer run?)
Please inspect the above messages and correct your domain model.
################################################ ISIS METAMODEL VALIDATION
ERRORS ################################################################
Datanucleus enhancer seems to work see attached log
We found a workaround, when adapting isis.properties and putting explicitly
the
isis.services = dom.simple.SimpleObjects,\
then it works.
Trying out with IDEA (the latest one), it works fine without any
adaptations, but my team is currently using eclipse.
I have some more issues, would come with them if we stuck...
Regs,Vladimir
Re: Experience with upgrade our application to 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT
Posted by Dan Haywood <da...@haywood-associates.co.uk>.
OK, cool, good to hear.
Feel free to vote on the 1.8.0 release if you wish; it's always nice to
have participation in votes from the wider community than just the
committers.
Cheers
Dan
On 23 February 2015 at 11:26, Vladimir Nišević <vn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Dan, thank you for your answer and hint. After I made cleanup of my
> local maven repository, it all works fine!
>
> Seems not to be any show-stopper at the moment.
>
> Regs,Vladimir
>
> 2015-02-20 18:14 GMT+01:00 Dan Haywood <da...@haywood-associates.co.uk>:
>
> > Hi Vladimir,
> >
> > Thanks for this feedback.
> >
> > We did have an issue with this a few days ago, I had made a silly error
> and
> > was corrupting the list of packages to go searching for services. So you
> > might just have picked up this bad version.
> >
> > Otherwise, I'm actually cutting the 1.8.0 release right now. Given
> there's
> > been so much work done in it, I'm sure that there will be a few bugs
> still
> > lurking; but for ourselves we're in production right now on a cut from
> > 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT, so we think it's reasonably stable.
> >
> > Let us know if you know of anything you consider a show-stopper, however.
> >
> > Thx
> > Dan
> >
> > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >
> > On 20 February 2015 at 10:37, Vladimir Nišević <vn...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi guys, first of all, great work in the upcoming version!
> > >
> > > We are currently using 1.7.0 in production and planning to upgrade to
> > > 1.8.0 - since it solves some othes our issues .
> > >
> > > Here some first experience we've made with 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT. My approach
> is
> > > usually to checkout the latest simpleapp, run it locally based on that
> > > experience adapt e.g. maven dependencies, new settings in our
> application
> > > that works with 1.7.0
> > > We also use simpleapp when trying to reproduce our issues.
> > >
> > > First experience I've made when launching the naked simpleapp-webapp
> > using
> > > eclipse IDE with provided .launch config, is that isis does not
> recognize
> > > any persistent classes and I get next error
> > >
> > >
> > > ################################################ ISIS METAMODEL
> > VALIDATION
> > > ERRORS ################################################################
> > >
> > > No @PersistenceCapable entities found. (Are the entities referenced by
> > the
> > > registered services? are all services registered? did the DataNucleus
> > > enhancer run?)
> > >
> > > Please inspect the above messages and correct your domain model.
> > >
> > > ################################################ ISIS METAMODEL
> > VALIDATION
> > > ERRORS ################################################################
> > >
> > > Datanucleus enhancer seems to work see attached log
> > >
> > >
> > > We found a workaround, when adapting isis.properties and putting
> > > explicitly the
> > >
> > > isis.services = dom.simple.SimpleObjects,\
> > >
> > > then it works.
> > >
> > > Trying out with IDEA (the latest one), it works fine without any
> > > adaptations, but my team is currently using eclipse.
> > >
> > > I have some more issues, would come with them if we stuck...
> > >
> > > Regs,Vladimir
> > >
> >
>
Re: Experience with upgrade our application to 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT
Posted by Vladimir Nišević <vn...@gmail.com>.
Hi Dan, thank you for your answer and hint. After I made cleanup of my
local maven repository, it all works fine!
Seems not to be any show-stopper at the moment.
Regs,Vladimir
2015-02-20 18:14 GMT+01:00 Dan Haywood <da...@haywood-associates.co.uk>:
> Hi Vladimir,
>
> Thanks for this feedback.
>
> We did have an issue with this a few days ago, I had made a silly error and
> was corrupting the list of packages to go searching for services. So you
> might just have picked up this bad version.
>
> Otherwise, I'm actually cutting the 1.8.0 release right now. Given there's
> been so much work done in it, I'm sure that there will be a few bugs still
> lurking; but for ourselves we're in production right now on a cut from
> 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT, so we think it's reasonably stable.
>
> Let us know if you know of anything you consider a show-stopper, however.
>
> Thx
> Dan
>
> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
> On 20 February 2015 at 10:37, Vladimir Nišević <vn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi guys, first of all, great work in the upcoming version!
> >
> > We are currently using 1.7.0 in production and planning to upgrade to
> > 1.8.0 - since it solves some othes our issues .
> >
> > Here some first experience we've made with 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT. My approach is
> > usually to checkout the latest simpleapp, run it locally based on that
> > experience adapt e.g. maven dependencies, new settings in our application
> > that works with 1.7.0
> > We also use simpleapp when trying to reproduce our issues.
> >
> > First experience I've made when launching the naked simpleapp-webapp
> using
> > eclipse IDE with provided .launch config, is that isis does not recognize
> > any persistent classes and I get next error
> >
> >
> > ################################################ ISIS METAMODEL
> VALIDATION
> > ERRORS ################################################################
> >
> > No @PersistenceCapable entities found. (Are the entities referenced by
> the
> > registered services? are all services registered? did the DataNucleus
> > enhancer run?)
> >
> > Please inspect the above messages and correct your domain model.
> >
> > ################################################ ISIS METAMODEL
> VALIDATION
> > ERRORS ################################################################
> >
> > Datanucleus enhancer seems to work see attached log
> >
> >
> > We found a workaround, when adapting isis.properties and putting
> > explicitly the
> >
> > isis.services = dom.simple.SimpleObjects,\
> >
> > then it works.
> >
> > Trying out with IDEA (the latest one), it works fine without any
> > adaptations, but my team is currently using eclipse.
> >
> > I have some more issues, would come with them if we stuck...
> >
> > Regs,Vladimir
> >
>
Re: Experience with upgrade our application to 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT
Posted by Dan Haywood <da...@haywood-associates.co.uk>.
Hi Vladimir,
Thanks for this feedback.
We did have an issue with this a few days ago, I had made a silly error and
was corrupting the list of packages to go searching for services. So you
might just have picked up this bad version.
Otherwise, I'm actually cutting the 1.8.0 release right now. Given there's
been so much work done in it, I'm sure that there will be a few bugs still
lurking; but for ourselves we're in production right now on a cut from
1.8.0-SNAPSHOT, so we think it's reasonably stable.
Let us know if you know of anything you consider a show-stopper, however.
Thx
Dan
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
On 20 February 2015 at 10:37, Vladimir Nišević <vn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi guys, first of all, great work in the upcoming version!
>
> We are currently using 1.7.0 in production and planning to upgrade to
> 1.8.0 - since it solves some othes our issues .
>
> Here some first experience we've made with 1.8.0-SNAPSHOT. My approach is
> usually to checkout the latest simpleapp, run it locally based on that
> experience adapt e.g. maven dependencies, new settings in our application
> that works with 1.7.0
> We also use simpleapp when trying to reproduce our issues.
>
> First experience I've made when launching the naked simpleapp-webapp using
> eclipse IDE with provided .launch config, is that isis does not recognize
> any persistent classes and I get next error
>
>
> ################################################ ISIS METAMODEL VALIDATION
> ERRORS ################################################################
>
> No @PersistenceCapable entities found. (Are the entities referenced by the
> registered services? are all services registered? did the DataNucleus
> enhancer run?)
>
> Please inspect the above messages and correct your domain model.
>
> ################################################ ISIS METAMODEL VALIDATION
> ERRORS ################################################################
>
> Datanucleus enhancer seems to work see attached log
>
>
> We found a workaround, when adapting isis.properties and putting
> explicitly the
>
> isis.services = dom.simple.SimpleObjects,\
>
> then it works.
>
> Trying out with IDEA (the latest one), it works fine without any
> adaptations, but my team is currently using eclipse.
>
> I have some more issues, would come with them if we stuck...
>
> Regs,Vladimir
>