[jira] Commented: (SHINDIG-582) Handle UNDISCLOSED gender values properly

["Paul Lindner (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-582?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12629530#action_12629530 ] 

Paul Lindner commented on SHINDIG-582:
--------------------------------------

new patch:

Index: features/opensocial-current/jsonrpccontainer.js
===================================================================
--- features/opensocial-current/jsonrpccontainer.js	(revision 693195)
+++ features/opensocial-current/jsonrpccontainer.js	(working copy)
@@ -301,7 +301,9 @@
   }
 
   if (serverJson.gender) {
-    var key = serverJson.gender == 'male' ? 'MALE' : 'FEMALE';
+    var key = serverJson.gender == 'male' ? 'MALE' : 
+             (serverJson.gender == 'female') ? 'FEMALE' :
+             null;
     serverJson.gender = {key : key, displayValue : serverJson.gender};
   }
 


> Handle UNDISCLOSED gender values properly
> -----------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: SHINDIG-582
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SHINDIG-582
>             Project: Shindig
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Common Components (Java)
>            Reporter: Paul Lindner
>            Assignee: Paul Lindner
>
> It's possible for the canonical value of undisclosed to be associated with a gender.  Current code in jsonrpccontainer.js maps this to FEMALE.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.