You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@hbase.apache.org by "Todd Lipcon (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/01/11 22:45:46 UTC
[jira] Updated: (HBASE-3433) Remove the KV copy of every KV in
Scan; introduced by HBASE-3232 (why doesn't keyonlyfilter make copies
rather than mutate -- HBASE-3211)?
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3433?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Todd Lipcon updated HBASE-3433:
-------------------------------
Component/s: regionserver
performance
> Remove the KV copy of every KV in Scan; introduced by HBASE-3232 (why doesn't keyonlyfilter make copies rather than mutate -- HBASE-3211)?
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: HBASE-3433
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HBASE-3433
> Project: HBase
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: performance, regionserver
> Reporter: stack
> Priority: Critical
> Fix For: 0.92.0
>
>
> Here is offending code from inside in StoreScanner#next:
> {code}
> // kv is no longer immutable due to KeyOnlyFilter! use copy for safety
> KeyValue copyKv = new KeyValue(kv.getBuffer(), kv.getOffset(), kv.getLength());
> {code}
> This looks wrong given philosophy up to this has been avoidance of garbage-making copies.
> Maybe this has been looked into before and this is the only thing to be done but why is KeyOnlyFilter not making copies rather than mutating originals?
> Making this critical against 0.92.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.