You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@chukwa.apache.org by Marvin <no...@apache.org> on 2013/04/01 17:27:21 UTC
Incubator PMC/Board report for Apr 2013 ([ppmc])
Dear podling,
This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC.
It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
board report.
The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 17 April 2013, 10:30:00:00 PST. The report
for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The Incubator PMC
requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks before the board meeting, to allow
sufficient time for review and submission (Wed, Apr 3rd).
Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the incubator PMC, and
subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you
should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board meeting.
Thanks,
The Apache Incubator PMC
Submitting your Report
----------------------
Your report should contain the following:
* Your project name
* A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of the project
or necessarily of its field
* A list of the three most important issues to address in the move towards
graduation.
* Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be aware of
* How has the community developed since the last report
* How has the project developed since the last report.
This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2013
Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little before this page is
created from a template.
Mentors
-------
Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on the
Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following the
project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the Incubator PMC.
Incubator PMC
Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Apr 2013 ([ppmc])
Posted by Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
On Apr 5, 2013, at 7:21 AM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>> With that said, we do need to be transparent in our reporting with respect to
>> the inactivity of the project and the community's decision to graduate in spite
>> of it.
>
> Looking at the decline of dev@ activity over the past few months I'm
> starting to agree with Alan on the issue of graduation/retirement.
> Quoting my message from general@ in November [1]:
>
> The question here isn't about exact metrics or some predefined level
> of activity that the project should be able to reach, but rather the
> trajectory you're on. Is there a reasonable expectation that Chukwa
> can reverse the downward trend in activity? What are you going to do
> to make that happen?
>
> Unfortunately the downward trend has continued, and we don't have a
> good idea on how to turn it around or at least keep it stable at the
> levels from say last year.
>
> With over three months since the last non-trivial code change
> (CHUKWA-565) and nearly two months since last bits of development
> discussion (CHUKWA-679), the situation looks much worse than it did at
> the end of last year. I would note this drop in activity in the
> report.
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/q75bqeyxg3i5idqo
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
Jukka, I've updated the mentor list at the bottom of Chukwa's report. Would you care to mark the report as reviewed?
Regards,
Alan
Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Apr 2013 ([ppmc])
Posted by Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
On Apr 7, 2013, at 10:59 PM, Eric Yang <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I am mentoring two SJSU students for their thesis related to monitoring
> Hadoop with Chukwa. Their work may bring new insights to continue the
> development.
That's great news!
Regards,
Alan
Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Apr 2013 ([ppmc])
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Tuesday, April 9, 2013, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>
> On Apr 8, 2013, at 11:43 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 8, 2013, at 8:27 AM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 7, 2013, at 11:48 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I don't think talking on the dev list about retirement is helpful, it
>>> will
>>>>> discourage people from participating.
>>>>
>>>> I disagree. Transparency is one of the hallmarks of the ASF.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> Its not about transparency Alan its about fostering an environment that
>> will encourage participation.
>
> As mentors we also have a responsibility to the ASF and the wider
community to be transparent about the reality of projects. We shall agree
to disagree.
>
>>>>> There is no imminent threat of
>>>>> retirement.
>>>>
>>>> Correct.
>>>>
>>>>> Poddlings can continue on in the Incubator as long as they need
>>>>> so long as there are still mentors willing, I'm happy to continue as
>>> mentor
>>>>> here for as long as needed, so so can Chukwa.
>>>>
>>>> I also am happy to let Chukwa incubate but would like to see concrete
>>> metrics that we all agree on as to what constitutes a viable project.
>>>>
>>>
>>
>> Lets have that discussion general@. One thing we can do is look at past
new
>> TLPs to see how low activity has been to be accepted in the past.
>>
>>
>>>>> Lets talk about things in
>>>>> terms of whats needed to graduate.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Agreed.
>>>>
>>>> With that said, I will not sign off on the report until we include some
>>> passage that explicitly states that the community is concerned about the
>>> lack of activity and is taking measures to attempt to remedy the
situation.
>>>
>>> I've added these bits:
>>>
>>> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>>>
>>> 1. Chukwa wiki is currently hosted in Hadoop subproject, it may be good
>>> to move it fully independent of Hadoop wiki.
>>> 2. Overall activity is dwindling. The podling needs to grow its active
>>> community.
>>>
>>> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
>>> aware of?
>>>
>>> * The podling is still working on increasing community activity. It's
>>> hoped that the addition of three new committers will help.
>>>
>>> Feel free to voice your opinion if you disagree with these entries.
>>>
>>>
>> I've made a slight tweak to have it sound less negative.
>
> The change completely removed the concern about the dwindling activity
that two mentors, and I'm sure that others, are now recently concerned
about. I will put it back.
>
The change was just to replace'dwindled' with 'low' which is consistent
with how other poddlings describe these sort of things. Whatever.
There was a discussion on general@ a while back where consensus was mentors
should leave the text of the report to the poddling and if mentors desired
they could add their own comments at the end with the shepherd comments. I
think that approach might work better here so let's try it for the next
reports.
...ant
Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Apr 2013 ([ppmc])
Posted by Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
On Apr 8, 2013, at 11:43 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> On Apr 8, 2013, at 8:27 AM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 7, 2013, at 11:48 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I don't think talking on the dev list about retirement is helpful, it
>> will
>>>> discourage people from participating.
>>>
>>> I disagree. Transparency is one of the hallmarks of the ASF.
>>>
>>
>
> Its not about transparency Alan its about fostering an environment that
> will encourage participation.
As mentors we also have a responsibility to the ASF and the wider community to be transparent about the reality of projects. We shall agree to disagree.
>>>> There is no imminent threat of
>>>> retirement.
>>>
>>> Correct.
>>>
>>>> Poddlings can continue on in the Incubator as long as they need
>>>> so long as there are still mentors willing, I'm happy to continue as
>> mentor
>>>> here for as long as needed, so so can Chukwa.
>>>
>>> I also am happy to let Chukwa incubate but would like to see concrete
>> metrics that we all agree on as to what constitutes a viable project.
>>>
>>
>
> Lets have that discussion general@. One thing we can do is look at past new
> TLPs to see how low activity has been to be accepted in the past.
>
>
>>>> Lets talk about things in
>>>> terms of whats needed to graduate.
>>>
>>>
>>> Agreed.
>>>
>>> With that said, I will not sign off on the report until we include some
>> passage that explicitly states that the community is concerned about the
>> lack of activity and is taking measures to attempt to remedy the situation.
>>
>> I've added these bits:
>>
>> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>>
>> 1. Chukwa wiki is currently hosted in Hadoop subproject, it may be good
>> to move it fully independent of Hadoop wiki.
>> 2. Overall activity is dwindling. The podling needs to grow its active
>> community.
>>
>> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
>> aware of?
>>
>> * The podling is still working on increasing community activity. It's
>> hoped that the addition of three new committers will help.
>>
>> Feel free to voice your opinion if you disagree with these entries.
>>
>>
> I've made a slight tweak to have it sound less negative.
The change completely removed the concern about the dwindling activity that two mentors, and I'm sure that others, are now recently concerned about. I will put it back.
Regards,
Alan
Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Apr 2013 ([ppmc])
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>
> On Apr 8, 2013, at 8:27 AM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > On Apr 7, 2013, at 11:48 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I don't think talking on the dev list about retirement is helpful, it
> will
> >> discourage people from participating.
> >
> > I disagree. Transparency is one of the hallmarks of the ASF.
> >
>
Its not about transparency Alan its about fostering an environment that
will encourage participation.
> >> There is no imminent threat of
> >> retirement.
> >
> > Correct.
> >
> >> Poddlings can continue on in the Incubator as long as they need
> >> so long as there are still mentors willing, I'm happy to continue as
> mentor
> >> here for as long as needed, so so can Chukwa.
> >
> > I also am happy to let Chukwa incubate but would like to see concrete
> metrics that we all agree on as to what constitutes a viable project.
> >
>
Lets have that discussion general@. One thing we can do is look at past new
TLPs to see how low activity has been to be accepted in the past.
> >> Lets talk about things in
> >> terms of whats needed to graduate.
> >
> >
> > Agreed.
> >
> > With that said, I will not sign off on the report until we include some
> passage that explicitly states that the community is concerned about the
> lack of activity and is taking measures to attempt to remedy the situation.
>
> I've added these bits:
>
> Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
>
> 1. Chukwa wiki is currently hosted in Hadoop subproject, it may be good
> to move it fully independent of Hadoop wiki.
> 2. Overall activity is dwindling. The podling needs to grow its active
> community.
>
> Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be
> aware of?
>
> * The podling is still working on increasing community activity. It's
> hoped that the addition of three new committers will help.
>
> Feel free to voice your opinion if you disagree with these entries.
>
>
I've made a slight tweak to have it sound less negative.
...ant
Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Apr 2013 ([ppmc])
Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 11:35 PM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> I've added these bits:
Looks good, thanks. Signed off.
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Apr 2013 ([ppmc])
Posted by Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
On Apr 8, 2013, at 8:27 AM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>
> On Apr 7, 2013, at 11:48 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I don't think talking on the dev list about retirement is helpful, it will
>> discourage people from participating.
>
> I disagree. Transparency is one of the hallmarks of the ASF.
>
>> There is no imminent threat of
>> retirement.
>
> Correct.
>
>> Poddlings can continue on in the Incubator as long as they need
>> so long as there are still mentors willing, I'm happy to continue as mentor
>> here for as long as needed, so so can Chukwa.
>
> I also am happy to let Chukwa incubate but would like to see concrete metrics that we all agree on as to what constitutes a viable project.
>
>> Lets talk about things in
>> terms of whats needed to graduate.
>
>
> Agreed.
>
> With that said, I will not sign off on the report until we include some passage that explicitly states that the community is concerned about the lack of activity and is taking measures to attempt to remedy the situation.
I've added these bits:
Three most important issues to address in the move towards graduation:
1. Chukwa wiki is currently hosted in Hadoop subproject, it may be good to move it fully independent of Hadoop wiki.
2. Overall activity is dwindling. The podling needs to grow its active community.
Any issues that the Incubator PMC (IPMC) or ASF Board wish/need to be aware of?
* The podling is still working on increasing community activity. It's hoped that the addition of three new committers will help.
Feel free to voice your opinion if you disagree with these entries.
Regards,
Alan
Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Apr 2013 ([ppmc])
Posted by Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
On Apr 7, 2013, at 11:48 PM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think talking on the dev list about retirement is helpful, it will
> discourage people from participating.
I disagree. Transparency is one of the hallmarks of the ASF.
> There is no imminent threat of
> retirement.
Correct.
> Poddlings can continue on in the Incubator as long as they need
> so long as there are still mentors willing, I'm happy to continue as mentor
> here for as long as needed, so so can Chukwa.
I also am happy to let Chukwa incubate but would like to see concrete metrics that we all agree on as to what constitutes a viable project.
> Lets talk about things in
> terms of whats needed to graduate.
Agreed.
With that said, I will not sign off on the report until we include some passage that explicitly states that the community is concerned about the lack of activity and is taking measures to attempt to remedy the situation.
Regards,
Alan
Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Apr 2013 ([ppmc])
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
I don't think talking on the dev list about retirement is helpful, it will
discourage people from participating. There is no imminent threat of
retirement. Poddlings can continue on in the Incubator as long as they need
so long as there are still mentors willing, I'm happy to continue as mentor
here for as long as needed, so so can Chukwa. Lets talk about things in
terms of whats needed to graduate.
There are plenty of small and relatively inactive existing ASF TLP's and
similar poddlings have graduated in the past and continue to exist ok.
Chukwa has shown continual activity here for 4 years so i don't think there
is any worry that the main participants are about to abandon it. Activity
has been low recently but people are still here doing things and helping
users. Ariel's mail here -
http://apache.markmail.org/message/5a3qmaph5bibxcqd - has a good summary of
the situation, but even like that there have been several past contributors
this quarter made new committers.
Lets wait and see how the two SJSU students turn out. Also, as Ariel
comments in the email link above doing another release would be a good way
to help others to engage and increase activity levels. It would be
interesting to hear from other mentors what so of activity levels they
would like to see. It might also be worth looking at some of the
alternative approaches to traditional incubation that have been discussed
on general@ recently.
...ant
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 6:59 AM, Eric Yang <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Agree that the downward trend did not stop this quarter. Although there is
> a lot of code modifications done in our labs, links to close source
> software made it difficult to contribute back. It looks like I won't be
> able to contributing actively into Chukwa community as I planned. However,
> I am mentoring two SJSU students for their thesis related to monitoring
> Hadoop with Chukwa. Their work may bring new insights to continue the
> development. I would like mentors to keep an open mind about this for one
> more quarter. Thanks
>
> regards,
> Eric
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Jukka Zitting <jukka.zitting@gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> wrote:
> > > With that said, we do need to be transparent in our reporting with
> > respect to
> > > the inactivity of the project and the community's decision to graduate
> > in spite
> > > of it.
> >
> > Looking at the decline of dev@ activity over the past few months I'm
> > starting to agree with Alan on the issue of graduation/retirement.
> > Quoting my message from general@ in November [1]:
> >
> > The question here isn't about exact metrics or some predefined level
> > of activity that the project should be able to reach, but rather the
> > trajectory you're on. Is there a reasonable expectation that Chukwa
> > can reverse the downward trend in activity? What are you going to do
> > to make that happen?
> >
> > Unfortunately the downward trend has continued, and we don't have a
> > good idea on how to turn it around or at least keep it stable at the
> > levels from say last year.
> >
> > With over three months since the last non-trivial code change
> > (CHUKWA-565) and nearly two months since last bits of development
> > discussion (CHUKWA-679), the situation looks much worse than it did at
> > the end of last year. I would note this drop in activity in the
> > report.
> >
> > [1] http://markmail.org/message/q75bqeyxg3i5idqo
> >
> > BR,
> >
> > Jukka Zitting
> >
>
Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Apr 2013 ([ppmc])
Posted by Eric Yang <er...@gmail.com>.
Agree that the downward trend did not stop this quarter. Although there is
a lot of code modifications done in our labs, links to close source
software made it difficult to contribute back. It looks like I won't be
able to contributing actively into Chukwa community as I planned. However,
I am mentoring two SJSU students for their thesis related to monitoring
Hadoop with Chukwa. Their work may bring new insights to continue the
development. I would like mentors to keep an open mind about this for one
more quarter. Thanks
regards,
Eric
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 7:21 AM, Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> > With that said, we do need to be transparent in our reporting with
> respect to
> > the inactivity of the project and the community's decision to graduate
> in spite
> > of it.
>
> Looking at the decline of dev@ activity over the past few months I'm
> starting to agree with Alan on the issue of graduation/retirement.
> Quoting my message from general@ in November [1]:
>
> The question here isn't about exact metrics or some predefined level
> of activity that the project should be able to reach, but rather the
> trajectory you're on. Is there a reasonable expectation that Chukwa
> can reverse the downward trend in activity? What are you going to do
> to make that happen?
>
> Unfortunately the downward trend has continued, and we don't have a
> good idea on how to turn it around or at least keep it stable at the
> levels from say last year.
>
> With over three months since the last non-trivial code change
> (CHUKWA-565) and nearly two months since last bits of development
> discussion (CHUKWA-679), the situation looks much worse than it did at
> the end of last year. I would note this drop in activity in the
> report.
>
> [1] http://markmail.org/message/q75bqeyxg3i5idqo
>
> BR,
>
> Jukka Zitting
>
Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Apr 2013 ([ppmc])
Posted by Jukka Zitting <ju...@gmail.com>.
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 5:00 PM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> With that said, we do need to be transparent in our reporting with respect to
> the inactivity of the project and the community's decision to graduate in spite
> of it.
Looking at the decline of dev@ activity over the past few months I'm
starting to agree with Alan on the issue of graduation/retirement.
Quoting my message from general@ in November [1]:
The question here isn't about exact metrics or some predefined level
of activity that the project should be able to reach, but rather the
trajectory you're on. Is there a reasonable expectation that Chukwa
can reverse the downward trend in activity? What are you going to do
to make that happen?
Unfortunately the downward trend has continued, and we don't have a
good idea on how to turn it around or at least keep it stable at the
levels from say last year.
With over three months since the last non-trivial code change
(CHUKWA-565) and nearly two months since last bits of development
discussion (CHUKWA-679), the situation looks much worse than it did at
the end of last year. I would note this drop in activity in the
report.
[1] http://markmail.org/message/q75bqeyxg3i5idqo
BR,
Jukka Zitting
Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Apr 2013 ([ppmc])
Posted by Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
On Apr 5, 2013, at 1:46 AM, ant elder <an...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks Eric, looks good to me.
>
> Under the issues left before graduation it mentions that wiki item, i don't
> think that necessarily needs to hold up graduation, so i wonder is there
> anything else at all left that needs to happen? Chuwka isn't a big fast
> moving poddling, but thats ok, i think its shown it would survive ok. What
> do others here think?
I hold a different opinion, which everyone knows. I'll most likely vote against graduation but I'll probably be out voted. No worries! No need to gain consensus on my behalf; we shall simply agree to disagree. :)
With that said, we do need to be transparent in our reporting with respect to the inactivity of the project and the community's decision to graduate in spite of it.
Regards,
Alan
Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Apr 2013 ([ppmc])
Posted by ant elder <an...@gmail.com>.
Thanks Eric, looks good to me.
Under the issues left before graduation it mentions that wiki item, i don't
think that necessarily needs to hold up graduation, so i wonder is there
anything else at all left that needs to happen? Chuwka isn't a big fast
moving poddling, but thats ok, i think its shown it would survive ok. What
do others here think?
...ant
On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 6:06 AM, Eric Yang <er...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I updated the report. Feel free to update the report as you see fit.
> Thanks.
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>
> >
> > Ping. :)
> >
> >
> > On Apr 2, 2013, at 9:29 PM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Who' going to pick this up? :)
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Alan
> > >
> > > On Apr 1, 2013, at 8:27 AM, Marvin <no...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Dear podling,
> > >>
> > >> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> > Incubator PMC.
> > >> It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your
> > quarterly
> > >> board report.
> > >>
> > >> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 17 April 2013, 10:30:00:00
> PST.
> > The report
> > >> for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The
> > Incubator PMC
> > >> requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks before the board meeting,
> > to allow
> > >> sufficient time for review and submission (Wed, Apr 3rd).
> > >>
> > >> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the incubator
> > PMC, and
> > >> subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very
> latest
> > you
> > >> should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board meeting.
> > >>
> > >> Thanks,
> > >>
> > >> The Apache Incubator PMC
> > >>
> > >> Submitting your Report
> > >> ----------------------
> > >>
> > >> Your report should contain the following:
> > >>
> > >> * Your project name
> > >> * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> > the project
> > >> or necessarily of its field
> > >> * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> > towards
> > >> graduation.
> > >> * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> > aware of
> > >> * How has the community developed since the last report
> > >> * How has the project developed since the last report.
> > >>
> > >> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
> > >>
> > >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2013
> > >>
> > >> Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
> > this page is
> > >> created from a template.
> > >>
> > >> Mentors
> > >> -------
> > >> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off
> on
> > the
> > >> Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following
> > the
> > >> project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the
> > Incubator PMC.
> > >>
> > >> Incubator PMC
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>
Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Apr 2013 ([ppmc])
Posted by Eric Yang <er...@gmail.com>.
I updated the report. Feel free to update the report as you see fit.
Thanks.
On Thu, Apr 4, 2013 at 4:00 PM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>
> Ping. :)
>
>
> On Apr 2, 2013, at 9:29 PM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
>
> > Who' going to pick this up? :)
> >
> >
> > Regards,
> > Alan
> >
> > On Apr 1, 2013, at 8:27 AM, Marvin <no...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>
> >> Dear podling,
> >>
> >> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache
> Incubator PMC.
> >> It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your
> quarterly
> >> board report.
> >>
> >> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 17 April 2013, 10:30:00:00 PST.
> The report
> >> for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The
> Incubator PMC
> >> requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks before the board meeting,
> to allow
> >> sufficient time for review and submission (Wed, Apr 3rd).
> >>
> >> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the incubator
> PMC, and
> >> subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest
> you
> >> should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board meeting.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >> The Apache Incubator PMC
> >>
> >> Submitting your Report
> >> ----------------------
> >>
> >> Your report should contain the following:
> >>
> >> * Your project name
> >> * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of
> the project
> >> or necessarily of its field
> >> * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move
> towards
> >> graduation.
> >> * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be
> aware of
> >> * How has the community developed since the last report
> >> * How has the project developed since the last report.
> >>
> >> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
> >>
> >> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2013
> >>
> >> Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little before
> this page is
> >> created from a template.
> >>
> >> Mentors
> >> -------
> >> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on
> the
> >> Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following
> the
> >> project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the
> Incubator PMC.
> >>
> >> Incubator PMC
> >>
> >
>
>
Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Apr 2013 ([ppmc])
Posted by Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
Ping. :)
On Apr 2, 2013, at 9:29 PM, Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com> wrote:
> Who' going to pick this up? :)
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On Apr 1, 2013, at 8:27 AM, Marvin <no...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Dear podling,
>>
>> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC.
>> It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
>> board report.
>>
>> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 17 April 2013, 10:30:00:00 PST. The report
>> for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The Incubator PMC
>> requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks before the board meeting, to allow
>> sufficient time for review and submission (Wed, Apr 3rd).
>>
>> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the incubator PMC, and
>> subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you
>> should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board meeting.
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> The Apache Incubator PMC
>>
>> Submitting your Report
>> ----------------------
>>
>> Your report should contain the following:
>>
>> * Your project name
>> * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of the project
>> or necessarily of its field
>> * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move towards
>> graduation.
>> * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be aware of
>> * How has the community developed since the last report
>> * How has the project developed since the last report.
>>
>> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>>
>> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2013
>>
>> Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little before this page is
>> created from a template.
>>
>> Mentors
>> -------
>> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on the
>> Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following the
>> project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the Incubator PMC.
>>
>> Incubator PMC
>>
>
Re: Incubator PMC/Board report for Apr 2013 ([ppmc])
Posted by Alan Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
Who' going to pick this up? :)
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 1, 2013, at 8:27 AM, Marvin <no...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>
> Dear podling,
>
> This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache Incubator PMC.
> It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to prepare your quarterly
> board report.
>
> The board meeting is scheduled for Wed, 17 April 2013, 10:30:00:00 PST. The report
> for your podling will form a part of the Incubator PMC report. The Incubator PMC
> requires your report to be submitted 2 weeks before the board meeting, to allow
> sufficient time for review and submission (Wed, Apr 3rd).
>
> Please submit your report with sufficient time to allow the incubator PMC, and
> subsequently board members to review and digest. Again, the very latest you
> should submit your report is 2 weeks prior to the board meeting.
>
> Thanks,
>
> The Apache Incubator PMC
>
> Submitting your Report
> ----------------------
>
> Your report should contain the following:
>
> * Your project name
> * A brief description of your project, which assumes no knowledge of the project
> or necessarily of its field
> * A list of the three most important issues to address in the move towards
> graduation.
> * Any issues that the Incubator PMC or ASF Board might wish/need to be aware of
> * How has the community developed since the last report
> * How has the project developed since the last report.
>
> This should be appended to the Incubator Wiki page at:
>
> http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/April2013
>
> Note: This manually populated. You may need to wait a little before this page is
> created from a template.
>
> Mentors
> -------
> Mentors should review reports for their project(s) and sign them off on the
> Incubator wiki page. Signing off reports shows that you are following the
> project - projects that are not signed may raise alarms for the Incubator PMC.
>
> Incubator PMC
>