You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@maven.apache.org by "Slawomir Jaranowski (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/07/29 20:49:00 UTC

[jira] [Assigned] (MENFORCER-424) Maven enforcer rule which checks that all dependencies in dependencyManagement don't have an explicit scope set

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-424?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Slawomir Jaranowski reassigned MENFORCER-424:
---------------------------------------------

    Assignee: Slawomir Jaranowski

> Maven enforcer rule which checks that all dependencies in dependencyManagement don't have an explicit scope set
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: MENFORCER-424
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MENFORCER-424
>             Project: Maven Enforcer Plugin
>          Issue Type: New Feature
>          Components: Standard Rules
>            Reporter: Konrad Windszus
>            Assignee: Slawomir Jaranowski
>            Priority: Major
>
> Setting the scope in the dependencyManagement is an anti-pattern and may lead to surprising results during classpath creation. Compare also with the discussion in https://github.com/apache/maven-apache-parent/pull/63#discussion_r788361219.
> I propose to add a new rule with name {{banDependencyManagementScope}}.
> Probably scope {{import}} should be accepted though, because it is a special case.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)