You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@storm.apache.org by Artem Ervits <ar...@gmail.com> on 2018/02/01 08:53:10 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.1.2 (rc2)
-1
Please include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2918
On Jan 31, 2018 3:59 PM, "Jungtaek Lim" <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Stig, ah yes, I didn't mix up but I didn't explain enough. Sorry about
> that. You made great efforts to make tests stable and I ported them (not
> sure I did everything but maybe most of things) back to only 1.x-branch,
> not 1.1.x/1.0.x. I would like to see the possibility about fixed this
> earlier. If not, looks like someone including me need to investigate the
> issue. Switching JDK helps so really odd though.
>
> 2018년 2월 1일 (목) 오전 3:47, Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>님이 작성:
>
> > I meant 1.1.2 RC.
> >
> > 2018-01-31 9:44 GMT+01:00 Jungtaek Lim <ka...@gmail.com>:
> >
> > > Build with JDK 7 fails 3 times in same test: "metrics-test" in a row.
> > Looks
> > > like building with JDK 8 helps build to pass, but since we support JDK
> 7
> > in
> > > 1.x version line, I would like to see build pass with JDK 7. It is hard
> > to
> > > say intermittent failure, yes it may be intermittent, but really high
> > > change.
> > >
> > > I'll try to build Storm 1.2.0 RC2 as well as Storm 1.0.6 RC2, and see
> the
> > > difference. I'll also try to build with Travis CI to double-check my
> > local
> > > dev. for JDK 7 is messed or not. If there's difference in result, I'll
> > > track down why the difference happens. Any help is much appreciated.
> > >
> > > Stig, did you encounter this? And if you encountered, did you submit a
> > > patch for this?
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
> > >
> > > 2018년 1월 30일 (화) 오전 4:45, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>님이 작성:
> > >
> > > > I’m open to synching storm-kafka-client across those releases if
> that’s
> > > > the direction we want to go, but I’d like to hear from others to make
> > > sure
> > > > there’s consensus.
> > > >
> > > > -Taylor
> > > >
> > > > > On Jan 29, 2018, at 4:04 AM, Jungtaek Lim <ka...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I'm waiting for hearing Taylor's opinion regarding replacing
> > > > > storm-kafka-client in 1.1.x-branch/1.0.x-branch with 1.x-branch,
> > since
> > > > he's
> > > > > release manager on 1.1.2/1.0.6, and IMHO it's ideal to apply the
> > change
> > > > > sooner if we agree on this rather than postponing to next release.
> > > > >
> > > > > I'll continue verifying 1.1.2 RC2 and 1.0.6 RC2 if he would want to
> > > take
> > > > > only blocker issue for current RCs.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
> > > > >
> > > > > 2018년 1월 27일 (토) 오전 6:11, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>님이
> 작성:
> > > > >
> > > > >> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 1.1.2 (rc2)
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Full list of changes in this release:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.
> > > 1.2-rc2/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v1.1.2:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=
> > >
> > 55ab8e9c072b09e634a9eddfc7b1e1e0d5d7c27b;hb=
> 5d2eecf3d282a535541ac7520a88b4
> > > 7f01153da1
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.
> > > 1.2-rc2/apache-storm-1.1.2-src.tar.gz
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.1.2-rc2/
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > >>
> > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_
> > > plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> > > > >>
> > > > >> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> > > > >>
> > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > orgapachestorm-1056
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 1.1.2.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the release.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 1.1.2
> > > > >> [ ] 0 No opinion
> > > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > > >>
> > > > >> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> -Taylor
> > > > >>
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.1.2 (rc2)
Posted by Hugo Da Cruz Louro <hl...@hortonworks.com>.
Agree that release should include Netty upgrade (STORM-2918)
> On Feb 1, 2018, at 3:39 AM, Satish Duggana <sa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> -1 (binding) to include STORM-2918
> <https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2918>
>
> Thanks,
> Satish.
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 2:23 PM, Artem Ervits <ar...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> -1
>> Please include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2918
>>
>> On Jan 31, 2018 3:59 PM, "Jungtaek Lim" <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Stig, ah yes, I didn't mix up but I didn't explain enough. Sorry about
>>> that. You made great efforts to make tests stable and I ported them (not
>>> sure I did everything but maybe most of things) back to only 1.x-branch,
>>> not 1.1.x/1.0.x. I would like to see the possibility about fixed this
>>> earlier. If not, looks like someone including me need to investigate the
>>> issue. Switching JDK helps so really odd though.
>>>
>>> 2018년 2월 1일 (목) 오전 3:47, Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>님이
>> 작성:
>>>
>>>> I meant 1.1.2 RC.
>>>>
>>>> 2018-01-31 9:44 GMT+01:00 Jungtaek Lim <ka...@gmail.com>:
>>>>
>>>>> Build with JDK 7 fails 3 times in same test: "metrics-test" in a row.
>>>> Looks
>>>>> like building with JDK 8 helps build to pass, but since we support
>> JDK
>>> 7
>>>> in
>>>>> 1.x version line, I would like to see build pass with JDK 7. It is
>> hard
>>>> to
>>>>> say intermittent failure, yes it may be intermittent, but really high
>>>>> change.
>>>>>
>>>>> I'll try to build Storm 1.2.0 RC2 as well as Storm 1.0.6 RC2, and see
>>> the
>>>>> difference. I'll also try to build with Travis CI to double-check my
>>>> local
>>>>> dev. for JDK 7 is messed or not. If there's difference in result,
>> I'll
>>>>> track down why the difference happens. Any help is much appreciated.
>>>>>
>>>>> Stig, did you encounter this? And if you encountered, did you submit
>> a
>>>>> patch for this?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>>>>
>>>>> 2018년 1월 30일 (화) 오전 4:45, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>님이 작성:
>>>>>
>>>>>> I’m open to synching storm-kafka-client across those releases if
>>> that’s
>>>>>> the direction we want to go, but I’d like to hear from others to
>> make
>>>>> sure
>>>>>> there’s consensus.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Taylor
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Jan 29, 2018, at 4:04 AM, Jungtaek Lim <ka...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm waiting for hearing Taylor's opinion regarding replacing
>>>>>>> storm-kafka-client in 1.1.x-branch/1.0.x-branch with 1.x-branch,
>>>> since
>>>>>> he's
>>>>>>> release manager on 1.1.2/1.0.6, and IMHO it's ideal to apply the
>>>> change
>>>>>>> sooner if we agree on this rather than postponing to next
>> release.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'll continue verifying 1.1.2 RC2 and 1.0.6 RC2 if he would want
>> to
>>>>> take
>>>>>>> only blocker issue for current RCs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2018년 1월 27일 (토) 오전 6:11, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>님이
>>> 작성:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 1.1.2 (rc2)
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Full list of changes in this release:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.
>>>>> 1.2-rc2/RELEASE_NOTES.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v1.1.2:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=
>>>>>
>>>> 55ab8e9c072b09e634a9eddfc7b1e1e0d5d7c27b;hb=
>>> 5d2eecf3d282a535541ac7520a88b4
>>>>> 7f01153da1
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.
>>>>> 1.2-rc2/apache-storm-1.1.2-src.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.1.2-rc2/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_
>>>>> plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
>>>>> orgapachestorm-1056
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 1.1.2.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the
>> release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 1.1.2
>>>>>>>> [ ] 0 No opinion
>>>>>>>> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> -Taylor
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Storm 1.1.2 (rc2)
Posted by Satish Duggana <sa...@gmail.com>.
-1 (binding) to include STORM-2918
<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2918>
Thanks,
Satish.
On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 2:23 PM, Artem Ervits <ar...@gmail.com> wrote:
> -1
> Please include https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/STORM-2918
>
> On Jan 31, 2018 3:59 PM, "Jungtaek Lim" <ka...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Stig, ah yes, I didn't mix up but I didn't explain enough. Sorry about
> > that. You made great efforts to make tests stable and I ported them (not
> > sure I did everything but maybe most of things) back to only 1.x-branch,
> > not 1.1.x/1.0.x. I would like to see the possibility about fixed this
> > earlier. If not, looks like someone including me need to investigate the
> > issue. Switching JDK helps so really odd though.
> >
> > 2018년 2월 1일 (목) 오전 3:47, Stig Rohde Døssing <st...@gmail.com>님이
> 작성:
> >
> > > I meant 1.1.2 RC.
> > >
> > > 2018-01-31 9:44 GMT+01:00 Jungtaek Lim <ka...@gmail.com>:
> > >
> > > > Build with JDK 7 fails 3 times in same test: "metrics-test" in a row.
> > > Looks
> > > > like building with JDK 8 helps build to pass, but since we support
> JDK
> > 7
> > > in
> > > > 1.x version line, I would like to see build pass with JDK 7. It is
> hard
> > > to
> > > > say intermittent failure, yes it may be intermittent, but really high
> > > > change.
> > > >
> > > > I'll try to build Storm 1.2.0 RC2 as well as Storm 1.0.6 RC2, and see
> > the
> > > > difference. I'll also try to build with Travis CI to double-check my
> > > local
> > > > dev. for JDK 7 is messed or not. If there's difference in result,
> I'll
> > > > track down why the difference happens. Any help is much appreciated.
> > > >
> > > > Stig, did you encounter this? And if you encountered, did you submit
> a
> > > > patch for this?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
> > > >
> > > > 2018년 1월 30일 (화) 오전 4:45, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>님이 작성:
> > > >
> > > > > I’m open to synching storm-kafka-client across those releases if
> > that’s
> > > > > the direction we want to go, but I’d like to hear from others to
> make
> > > > sure
> > > > > there’s consensus.
> > > > >
> > > > > -Taylor
> > > > >
> > > > > > On Jan 29, 2018, at 4:04 AM, Jungtaek Lim <ka...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'm waiting for hearing Taylor's opinion regarding replacing
> > > > > > storm-kafka-client in 1.1.x-branch/1.0.x-branch with 1.x-branch,
> > > since
> > > > > he's
> > > > > > release manager on 1.1.2/1.0.6, and IMHO it's ideal to apply the
> > > change
> > > > > > sooner if we agree on this rather than postponing to next
> release.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'll continue verifying 1.1.2 RC2 and 1.0.6 RC2 if he would want
> to
> > > > take
> > > > > > only blocker issue for current RCs.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > -Jungtaek Lim (HeartSaVioR)
> > > > > >
> > > > > > 2018년 1월 27일 (토) 오전 6:11, P. Taylor Goetz <pt...@gmail.com>님이
> > 작성:
> > > > > >
> > > > > >> This is a call to vote on releasing Apache Storm 1.1.2 (rc2)
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Full list of changes in this release:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.
> > > > 1.2-rc2/RELEASE_NOTES.html
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The tag/commit to be voted upon is v1.1.2:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=tree;h=
> > > >
> > > 55ab8e9c072b09e634a9eddfc7b1e1e0d5d7c27b;hb=
> > 5d2eecf3d282a535541ac7520a88b4
> > > > 7f01153da1
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The source archive being voted upon can be found here:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.
> > > > 1.2-rc2/apache-storm-1.1.2-src.tar.gz
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Other release files, signatures and digests can be found here:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/storm/apache-storm-1.1.2-rc2/
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The release artifacts are signed with the following key:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >>
> > > > > https://git-wip-us.apache.org/repos/asf?p=storm.git;a=blob_
> > > > plain;f=KEYS;hb=22b832708295fa2c15c4f3c70ac0d2bc6fded4bd
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> The Nexus staging repository for this release is:
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/
> > > > orgapachestorm-1056
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Please vote on releasing this package as Apache Storm 1.1.2.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> When voting, please list the actions taken to verify the
> release.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> This vote will be open for at least 72 hours.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> [ ] +1 Release this package as Apache Storm 1.1.2
> > > > > >> [ ] 0 No opinion
> > > > > >> [ ] -1 Do not release this package because...
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> Thanks to everyone who contributed to this release.
> > > > > >>
> > > > > >> -Taylor
> > > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
>