You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by Sidney Markowitz <si...@sidney.com> on 2007/08/10 02:14:08 UTC

3.1.10 release?

Shall we try again? 3.1.10 was ready for release but got blocked at the
last moment by bug 5574. That now needs 2 more votes to commit to the
3.1 branch.

 -- sidney

Re: 3.1.10 release?

Posted by Doc Schneider <ma...@maddoc.net>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> Doc Schneider wrote, On 10/8/07 12:18 PM:
>> Sidney Markowitz wrote:
>>> Shall we try again? 3.1.10 was ready for release but got blocked at the
>>> last moment by bug 5574. That now needs 2 more votes to commit to the
>>> 3.1 branch.
>>>  -- sidney
>> +1
>>
> I can't tell if that was a +1 for a release or for bug 5574 commit to
> 3.1 branch or both. Here's the clicky for the bug. Votes for the commit
> should be posted there.
> 
>  http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5574

Ah I mis-understood... thought this was a vote to release it and it was
patched already. I'll check out the patch and vote there.

- --

 -Doc

 Penguins: Do it on the ice.
   8:44am  up 4 days, 16:55, 17 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.30, 0.37

 SARE HQ  http://www.rulesemporium.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGu7RCqOEeBwEpgcsRAoP/AJsFul0yUeqwa0T5rfLOleSCu0gvtQCgh5if
JNU8UBvfmwlN+ytrIvZx8hU=
=5Ypp
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: 3.1.10 release?

Posted by Sidney Markowitz <si...@sidney.com>.
Doc Schneider wrote, On 10/8/07 12:18 PM:
> Sidney Markowitz wrote:
>> Shall we try again? 3.1.10 was ready for release but got blocked at the
>> last moment by bug 5574. That now needs 2 more votes to commit to the
>> 3.1 branch.
> 
>>  -- sidney
> 
> +1
> 
I can't tell if that was a +1 for a release or for bug 5574 commit to
3.1 branch or both. Here's the clicky for the bug. Votes for the commit
should be posted there.

 http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5574

Re: 3.1.10 release?

Posted by Doc Schneider <ma...@maddoc.net>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> Shall we try again? 3.1.10 was ready for release but got blocked at the
> last moment by bug 5574. That now needs 2 more votes to commit to the
> 3.1 branch.
> 
>  -- sidney

+1

- --

 -Doc

 Penguins: Do it on the ice.
   8:44am  up 4 days, 16:55, 17 users,  load average: 0.18, 0.30, 0.37

 SARE HQ  http://www.rulesemporium.com/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.5 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with CentOS - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGu67mqOEeBwEpgcsRAi27AJ9nDmFpgYLXf4mlmmtiOqPEcaxXEQCffdQG
oL7rJKOXVbiceM13eCgWkYs=
=yHKH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Re: 3.1.10 release?

Posted by Sidney Markowitz <si...@sidney.com>.
Matt Kettler wrote, On 10/8/07 12:35 PM:
> Where can I find a version of the patch that applies to the previous
> candidate 3.1.10 tarball? (or an updated tarball)

Whoops, that's right. I'll put together a new patch for 3.1 and attach
it to the bug report.

Sorry,

 -- sidney

Re: 3.1.10 release?

Posted by Matt Kettler <mk...@verizon.net>.
Sidney Markowitz wrote:
> Shall we try again? 3.1.10 was ready for release but got blocked at the
> last moment by bug 5574. That now needs 2 more votes to commit to the
> 3.1 branch.
>
>  -- sidney
>
>   
Where can I find a version of the patch that applies to the previous
candidate 3.1.10 tarball? (or an updated tarball)

I tried the current attachment, but it seems to be a patch against the
3.2 branch

http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=4077&action=view

-------------------------------------------------------------

patching file MANIFEST
Hunk #1 FAILED at 502.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file MANIFEST.rej
patching file lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1336.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
lib/Mail/SpamAssassin/Util.pm.r
ej
patching file t/root_spamd_u_dcc.t
patching file t/root_spamd_u.t
patching file spamd/spamd.raw
Hunk #1 FAILED at 1024.
1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file spamd/spamd.raw.rej