[jira] [Issue Comment Edited] (CXF-3685) Packaging issue in the jax_rs_basic_https sample project.

["Robert Liguori (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3685?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=13070912#comment-13070912 ] 

Robert Liguori edited comment on CXF-3685 at 7/26/11 3:00 AM:
--------------------------------------------------------------

I look at some of the other projects and they do the same as was done with this project... but the IDEs don't flag any issues... so your observation is correct... thanks!

However, something hokey is going on here as both NetBeans and Eclipse don't like something about this one particular project... and for whatever reason, they are both pointing to the packaging.

      was (Author: rliguori):
    Hmmm... I see your point, but both Eclipse and NetBeans flag it as a problem.  

Perhaps the IDEs need to make adjustments for this particular use case?
  
> Packaging issue in the jax_rs_basic_https sample project.
> ---------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: CXF-3685
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CXF-3685
>             Project: CXF
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Samples
>    Affects Versions: 2.4.1
>         Environment: JAX-RS Basic Demo With HTTPS communications (jax_rs_basic_https)
>            Reporter: Robert Liguori
>            Priority: Minor
>
> The package statements in the jax_rs_basic_https sample project files do not match the actually package names.
> Example:
> package httpsdemo.client; vs. main.java.httpsdemo.client
> Note: I'm not sure how the developer of this example project could have missed this, am I missing something?

--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
For more information on JIRA, see: http://www.atlassian.com/software/jira